There should be, but I'm not entirely convinced by a post restriction that reveals a town power role from the off. Probably worth some protection or a watcher on them, though.
I interpreted Flower's read on me more because she felt I was actually analysing the thread, not simply pretending to.
So, let's just fact check this real quick. I've currently voted for Juliet, who I haven't actually disagreed with anywhere. I've voted for Lind, who I less disagreed with, and more saw generically-scummy play from. And I voted you, for defending Lind when your read on him should not have compelled you to do. Where has the "you only vote people you disagree with" come from? Why are you bringing ego into this? All you're doing here is summarising my play and spinning it in a way that makes it appear scummy - you're not actually demonstrating any scummy play from my posts at all. Want to try this one again?
I interpreted Flower's read on me more because she felt I was actually analysing the thread, not simply pretending to.
So, let's just fact check this real quick. I've currently voted for Juliet, who I haven't actually disagreed with anywhere. I've voted for Lind, who I less disagreed with, and more saw generically-scummy play from. And I voted you, for defending Lind when your read on him should not have compelled you to do. Where has the "you only vote people you disagree with" come from? Why are you bringing ego into this? All you're doing here is summarising my play and spinning it in a way that makes it appear scummy - you're not actually demonstrating any scummy play from my posts at all. Want to try this one again?
If you are not open to discuss with others possibilites of people actually being innocent after you VOTE THEM in a game when you are supposed to work eith your TEAM to win then you are ego tripping and i am voting for you.