Current Events So Zoro's Arc Opponent is Lucci
- Thread starter Cinera
- Start date
Because I was wrong once, I will be wrong all the time?
You think that's how it works?
You think that's how it works?
This obsession to take what belongs to Luffy is getting boring.
I am not trolling about these match-ups.
They are obvious if you even think a little bit about it other than processing what you got served last on panel.
This is the same mistake Zoribros made when Zoro fought Kaido while I said he would fight King.
Whatever is on panel changes on weekly basis. Weekly reactions are funny, if nothing else.
Since when is a mere soldier Luffy's job while the leader is in the same arc as well?
There is no obsession here. Kizaru always belonged to Zoro. Luffy and Kizaru were never mentioned in same sentence before Egghead.
A swordsman belongs to Zoro, he always did.
They are obvious if you even think a little bit about it other than processing what you got served last on panel.
This is the same mistake Zoribros made when Zoro fought Kaido while I said he would fight King.
Whatever is on panel changes on weekly basis. Weekly reactions are funny, if nothing else.
Since when is a mere soldier Luffy's job while the leader is in the same arc as well?
There is no obsession here. Kizaru always belonged to Zoro. Luffy and Kizaru were never mentioned in same sentence before Egghead.
A swordsman belongs to Zoro, he always did.
The leader of the invading fleet is Kizaru. The narrator confirmed. The leader of the force that's currently occupying Egghead is Luffy.
But there is. Kizaru never belonged to Zoro and Kaido never belonged to Zoro either which is why he didn't get beaten by him.
Let it go. Zoro can have his own adventure, he doesn't need to steal what belongs to Luffy.
But they were, you just ignored it. When Luffy landed on the island of women the first thing he did is to express the desire to surpass Kizaru one day, now the time has come to prove it. Even if that scene didn't exist who told you Luffy and Kizaru must be mentioned in the same sentence to have a fight ? Was Luffy and Katakuri mentioned before ?
You're basically setting up your own rules that need to be met so that what you have in mind can happen but Oda has different plans.
No.
But there is. Kizaru never belonged to Zoro and Kaido never belonged to Zoro either which is why he didn't get beaten by him.
Let it go. Zoro can have his own adventure, he doesn't need to steal what belongs to Luffy.
But they were, you just ignored it. When Luffy landed on the island of women the first thing he did is to express the desire to surpass Kizaru one day, now the time has come to prove it. Even if that scene didn't exist who told you Luffy and Kizaru must be mentioned in the same sentence to have a fight ? Was Luffy and Katakuri mentioned before ?
You're basically setting up your own rules that need to be met so that what you have in mind can happen but Oda has different plans.
No.
Kizaru is a soldier who carries out orders of the actual leader who sits on the ship in front of Egghead.
If his purpose was to do nothing he could have stayed in MJ, yet he came here. Put 2 and 2 together.
There is no such thing as stealing from Luffy. Luffy is the one who is currently stealing away from Zoro.
Nope they werent. It was always Luffy vs Akainu and that's all anyone ever said about Luffy vs Admirals.
Katakuri is a nobody from one arc. Kizaru is an opponent with long build up, not for Luffy though.
Tell me one time when Luffy took a swordsman in the arc instead of Zoro.
If his purpose was to do nothing he could have stayed in MJ, yet he came here. Put 2 and 2 together.
There is no such thing as stealing from Luffy. Luffy is the one who is currently stealing away from Zoro.
Nope they werent. It was always Luffy vs Akainu and that's all anyone ever said about Luffy vs Admirals.
Katakuri is a nobody from one arc. Kizaru is an opponent with long build up, not for Luffy though.
Tell me one time when Luffy took a swordsman in the arc instead of Zoro.
Again. The leader of the military force that came to Egghead to do battle is Kizaru, as the narrator confirmed.
No. Luffy as always takes what is his while you want Zoro to steal what was never meant for him.
Luffy expressed more desire to surpass Kizaru than he ever did Akainu, we have it on panel.
What the people say is irrelevant, what Oda says is important and Oda said Luffy wants to surpass Kizaru. Katakuri is one of the longest 1v1 fights Luffy ever had and the existence of that fight debunks your argument. Both fighters were never mentioned even once before they did battle thus the rule you created is nonsense.
Once again. A rule you set so that your scenario can become reality. Let me ask you this, why didn't Zoro kill Kaido ?
No. Luffy as always takes what is his while you want Zoro to steal what was never meant for him.
Luffy expressed more desire to surpass Kizaru than he ever did Akainu, we have it on panel.
What the people say is irrelevant, what Oda says is important and Oda said Luffy wants to surpass Kizaru. Katakuri is one of the longest 1v1 fights Luffy ever had and the existence of that fight debunks your argument. Both fighters were never mentioned even once before they did battle thus the rule you created is nonsense.
Tell me one time when Luffy took a swordsman in the arc instead of Zoro.
I don't think either will be a full fight tbh
The tables turned on them super quickly with the pacifistas switching sides (should've given the control chip to Vegapunk lol), the navy fleet right outside and Saturn in the back.
Just a matter of time till the Seraphim get released too, so they HAVE to escape quickly.
Zoro could maybe beat Lucci that fast but there's no way Luffy's just negging Kizaru.
The tables turned on them super quickly with the pacifistas switching sides (should've given the control chip to Vegapunk lol), the navy fleet right outside and Saturn in the back.
Just a matter of time till the Seraphim get released too, so they HAVE to escape quickly.
Zoro could maybe beat Lucci that fast but there's no way Luffy's just negging Kizaru.
The leader of that military is an obedient soldier of the actual leader in front of the island.
Luffy has not once taken a swordsman away from Zoro.
He expressed the same desire to surpass Kizaru as he expressed towards Kuma and Sentomaru.
No, Katakuri doesnt debunk anything. Luffy didnt take a swordsman away from Zoro by fighting Katakuri.
There are no my rules here. Only facts that can be discovered by observing what happened in 1091 chapters so far.
Luffy hasnt once taken a swordsman away from Zoro.
I dont know why he didnt kill Kaido. One thing is sure, Luffy didnt steal the kill from Zoro as long as Kaido is alive.
Luffy has not once taken a swordsman away from Zoro.
He expressed the same desire to surpass Kizaru as he expressed towards Kuma and Sentomaru.
No, Katakuri doesnt debunk anything. Luffy didnt take a swordsman away from Zoro by fighting Katakuri.
There are no my rules here. Only facts that can be discovered by observing what happened in 1091 chapters so far.
Luffy hasnt once taken a swordsman away from Zoro.
I dont know why he didnt kill Kaido. One thing is sure, Luffy didnt steal the kill from Zoro as long as Kaido is alive.
Come to think of, it paralells Zoro getting Luffy's sloppy seconds with the swordman VA getting Lucci's sloppy seconds so you may have a point.