This is a simple shadowing. With just this pic, people should be able to guess the propriety of the fruit. The actual name ("Nika") is part of the revelation so it didn't needed to be foreshadowed during the time skip. What matter was the propriety of the fruit:
Rubber + Imagination = limitless power up.
We could also make the link with a possible toon force by this very panel:
The gear 5 was under our nose this entire time.
But we don't even need to know if that was intended or not, the shadowing are HERE so the retroactivity of the plantings are EFFECTIVE. (the retroactivity of plantings is something that I developped in the post)
No, You are just like school studient that think they know better than the teacher. This is something quite common in storytelling studies, I was like that once too.
Lee33, Pooth, and myself, including Ghostly, have been saying that Oda is writing himself into a corner.
What happened to Drizzt?
Why Morj didnt criticize Wano as much as he was doing at the start?
I was banned on Reddit by Kirosh back in 2013-14 simply because I asked how strong is Kaido and Big Mom. If they are strong, why we dont have their fights against other top tiers, etc.
But I have stopped One Piece rants. Likewise, you dont need to justify Oda's actions.
At the end of the day, individuals decide how they view the story.
It can be a master piece for you and trash for others.
We need to draw a line where OP cultists start to think it is a sin to criticize One Piece.
Lee33, Pooth, and myself, including Ghostly, have been saying that Oda is writing himself into a corner.
What happened to Drizzt?
Why Morj didnt criticize Wano as much as he was doing at the start?
I was banned on Reddit by Kirosh back in 2013-14 simply because I asked how strong is Kaido and Big Mom. If they are strong, why we dont have their fights against other top tiers, etc.
But I have stopped One Piece rants. Likewise, you dont need to justify Oda's actions.
At the end of the day, individuals decide how they view the story.
It can be a master piece for you and trash for others.
We need to draw a line where OP cultists start to think it is a sin to criticize One Piece.
This is a simple shadowing. With just this pic, people should be able to guess the propriety of the fruit. The actual name ("Nika") is part of the revelation so it didn't needed to be foreshadowed during the time skip. What matter was the propriety of the fruit:
Rubber + Imagination = limitless power up.
We could also make the link with a possible toon force by this very panel:
The gear 5 was under our nose this entire time.
But we don't even need to know if that was intended or not, the shadowing are HERE so the retroactivity of the plantings are EFFECTIVE. (the retroactivity of plantings is something that I developped in the post)
No, You are just like school studient that think they know better than the teacher. This is something quite common in storytelling studies, I was like that once too.
It means you cant write essays defending the author when the author himself says that "I made up this shit 5 chapters ago, I didnt think fans will like it this much". He does it litetally every time he gets a chance to speak about OP story.
I stopped caring about One Piece when Oda said this:
"For the concept, think of it as if I suddenly drew Tom and Jerry," Oda explained. "When I tried to draw it, it was actually difficult. The world of Tom and Jerry works because of the two of them. I suffered because of the difference in attitude when I looked at Luffy being the only one making pranks in battle and his opponent not. But I feel this time I was able to draw it."
It means you cant write essays defending the author when the author himself says that "I made up this shit 5 chapters ago, I didnt think fans will like it this much". He does it litetally every time he gets a chance to speak about OP story.
I stopped caring about One Piece when Oda said this:
"For the concept, think of it as if I suddenly drew Tom and Jerry," Oda explained. "When I tried to draw it, it was actually difficult. The world of Tom and Jerry works because of the two of them. I suffered because of the difference in attitude when I looked at Luffy being the only one making pranks in battle and his opponent not. But I feel this time I was able to draw it."
There you have it folks.
There is no point in this discussion.
It is plagiarism, see the panel by panel comparison.
He was worried that if Luffy is Tom, his opponent needs to be Jerry. That's why he said it was difficult to draw it against Kaido, but at the end he managed it somehow.
Foreshadowing: Expect Imu-sama to be Luffy's Jerry.
It means you cant write essays defending the author when the author himself says that "I made up this shit 5 chapters ago, I didnt think fans will like it this much". He does it litetally every time he gets a chance to speak about OP story.
I stopped caring about One Piece when Oda said this:
"For the concept, think of it as if I suddenly drew Tom and Jerry," Oda explained. "When I tried to draw it, it was actually difficult. The world of Tom and Jerry works because of the two of them. I suffered because of the difference in attitude when I looked at Luffy being the only one making pranks in battle and his opponent not. But I feel this time I was able to draw it."
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.