General & Others STORYTELLING - Gear 5 is amazing

#42
Find me one place during pre TS where Oda hinted Gimu gomu was a mythical zoan
Where Nika was actually a fruit

Even before Yonko Saga or during Yonko Saga before the raid
Here:



This is a simple shadowing. With just this pic, people should be able to guess the propriety of the fruit. The actual name ("Nika") is part of the revelation so it didn't needed to be foreshadowed during the time skip. What matter was the propriety of the fruit:

Rubber + Imagination = limitless power up.

We could also make the link with a possible toon force by this very panel:



The gear 5 was under our nose this entire time.

But we don't even need to know if that was intended or not, the shadowing are HERE so the retroactivity of the plantings are EFFECTIVE. (the retroactivity of plantings is something that I developped in the post)


The rest of us are just too stupid to keep up with him bro
No, You are just like school studient that think they know better than the teacher. This is something quite common in storytelling studies, I was like that once too.
 
#43
Lee33, Pooth, and myself, including Ghostly, have been saying that Oda is writing himself into a corner.
What happened to Drizzt?
Why Morj didnt criticize Wano as much as he was doing at the start?

I was banned on Reddit by Kirosh back in 2013-14 simply because I asked how strong is Kaido and Big Mom. If they are strong, why we dont have their fights against other top tiers, etc.

But I have stopped One Piece rants. Likewise, you dont need to justify Oda's actions.
At the end of the day, individuals decide how they view the story.
It can be a master piece for you and trash for others.
We need to draw a line where OP cultists start to think it is a sin to criticize One Piece.
 
#44
Lee33, Pooth, and myself, including Ghostly, have been saying that Oda is writing himself into a corner.
What happened to Drizzt?
Why Morj didnt criticize Wano as much as he was doing at the start?

I was banned on Reddit by Kirosh back in 2013-14 simply because I asked how strong is Kaido and Big Mom. If they are strong, why we dont have their fights against other top tiers, etc.

But I have stopped One Piece rants. Likewise, you dont need to justify Oda's actions.
At the end of the day, individuals decide how they view the story.
It can be a master piece for you and trash for others.
We need to draw a line where OP cultists start to think it is a sin to criticize One Piece.
Ok.. ?
 
#45
Here:



This is a simple shadowing. With just this pic, people should be able to guess the propriety of the fruit. The actual name ("Nika") is part of the revelation so it didn't needed to be foreshadowed during the time skip. What matter was the propriety of the fruit:

Rubber + Imagination = limitless power up.

We could also make the link with a possible toon force by this very panel:



The gear 5 was under our nose this entire time.

But we don't even need to know if that was intended or not, the shadowing are HERE so the retroactivity of the plantings are EFFECTIVE. (the retroactivity of plantings is something that I developped in the post)



No, You are just like school studient that think they know better than the teacher. This is something quite common in storytelling studies, I was like that once too.
Does it mean Tom & Jerry > One Piece/G5?:kayneshrug:

At best, it is a simple INSPIRATION.
At worst, it is PLAGIARISM!

For me, it is plagiarism based on Luffy vs Kaido fight.
 
#47
Does it mean Tom & Jerry > One Piece/G5?:kayneshrug:

At best, it is a simple INSPIRATION.
At worst, it is PLAGIARISM!

For me, it is plagiarism based on Luffy vs Kaido fight.
Its an inspiration but also a shadowing like I explained in the post.


How dare we question such a superior mind with out of this world understanding of such a complex pulitzer award winner series like one piece?????
I love how the reality contradict completely your statement.. I guess stay on the bitter part of worstgen, the rest of us will enjoy the story :milaugh:
 
#48
It means you cant write essays defending the author when the author himself says that "I made up this shit 5 chapters ago, I didnt think fans will like it this much". He does it litetally every time he gets a chance to speak about OP story.

I stopped caring about One Piece when Oda said this:

"For the concept, think of it as if I suddenly drew Tom and Jerry," Oda explained. "When I tried to draw it, it was actually difficult. The world of Tom and Jerry works because of the two of them. I suffered because of the difference in attitude when I looked at Luffy being the only one making pranks in battle and his opponent not. But I feel this time I was able to draw it."
Post automatically merged:

Its an inspiration but also a shadowing like I explained in the post.



I love how the reality contradict completely your statement.. I guess stay on the bitter part of worstgen, the rest of us will enjoy the story :milaugh:
It is plagiarism:



I wonder how Oda get away with this lol
 
#50
It means you cant write essays defending the author when the author himself says that "I made up this shit 5 chapters ago, I didnt think fans will like it this much". He does it litetally every time he gets a chance to speak about OP story.

I stopped caring about One Piece when Oda said this:

"For the concept, think of it as if I suddenly drew Tom and Jerry," Oda explained. "When I tried to draw it, it was actually difficult. The world of Tom and Jerry works because of the two of them. I suffered because of the difference in attitude when I looked at Luffy being the only one making pranks in battle and his opponent not. But I feel this time I was able to draw it."
I do not care of the statement of Oda on his story, I'm only analysing if the story works or not. You should know that by now with me.


No, this is inspiration.. but I get that you don't understand the difference lol.
 
#51
So why people who clearly have read the Devil fruit book, didn't found strange that the Gum Gum Fruit was not there before Nika reveal?
 
#54
I do not care of the statement of Oda on his story, I'm only analysing if the story works or not. You should know that by now with me.



No, this is inspiration.. but I get that you don't understand the difference lol.
There you have it folks.
There is no point in this discussion.

It is plagiarism, see the panel by panel comparison.


He was worried that if Luffy is Tom, his opponent needs to be Jerry. That's why he said it was difficult to draw it against Kaido, but at the end he managed it somehow.

Foreshadowing: Expect Imu-sama to be Luffy's Jerry.
 
#55
It means you cant write essays defending the author when the author himself says that "I made up this shit 5 chapters ago, I didnt think fans will like it this much". He does it litetally every time he gets a chance to speak about OP story.

I stopped caring about One Piece when Oda said this:

"For the concept, think of it as if I suddenly drew Tom and Jerry," Oda explained. "When I tried to draw it, it was actually difficult. The world of Tom and Jerry works because of the two of them. I suffered because of the difference in attitude when I looked at Luffy being the only one making pranks in battle and his opponent not. But I feel this time I was able to draw it."
Post automatically merged:


It is plagiarism:



I wonder how Oda get away with this lol
Oh and you literally made my point for me lol
 
Top