Character Discussion What are in your opinion the TOP 5 Frauds in One Piece?..
- Thread starter Rootbeer
- Start date
He beat Katakuri oh his own. I cant help it if u r blind.
He did the most job against Doflamingo and Kaidou.
He is the only one who defeated Cracker. Your 'logical plot argument' stalled Cracker defeat.
And you need a good math teacher. Whoever taught you percentages must be some fraud.
Again, Luffy powerlevel is relevant to his opponent in that arc. Irrelevant to No. 2 of Luffys crew.
He did the most job against Doflamingo and Kaidou.
He is the only one who defeated Cracker. Your 'logical plot argument' stalled Cracker defeat.
And you need a good math teacher. Whoever taught you percentages must be some fraud.
Again, Luffy powerlevel is relevant to his opponent in that arc. Irrelevant to No. 2 of Luffys crew.
No he didnt without brulee being there he dies.
No he didnt even after gamma knife luffy needed saving from gatz or super nerfed doffy would have killed him.
Nami literally said WE beat Cracker without her nerfing him he loses again
Lmfao no. Kaido wasted haki all day and all stamina on lifting an island
Hes lucky kaido ran out of energy mid clash.
No he didnt even after gamma knife luffy needed saving from gatz or super nerfed doffy would have killed him.
Nami literally said WE beat Cracker without her nerfing him he loses again
Lmfao no. Kaido wasted haki all day and all stamina on lifting an island
Hes lucky kaido ran out of energy mid clash.
That does not matter Brulee didn't fight Katakuri. Only Luffy vs Katakuri happened.
No, Oda said Luffy could hide from Doffy until he got his haki back. Reread that Sbs. He is just saving energy.
Lol, Cracker was stalled not nerfed. If anything, Luffy was nerfed to stall the fight for 8 hrs.
Another lie. Kaidou didn't ran out of haki. It is all in your head. He lost in clash. His stamina came down because of the prolonged fight. Not once it was implied that he was losing stamina because of lifting island.
All this debate has nothing to do with no.2. It is just ambiguous relevant to Luffy's opponents.
There isn't anything civil. It is pointless to discuss when it is confirmed who is no.2.
No, Oda said Luffy could hide from Doffy until he got his haki back. Reread that Sbs. He is just saving energy.
Lol, Cracker was stalled not nerfed. If anything, Luffy was nerfed to stall the fight for 8 hrs.
Another lie. Kaidou didn't ran out of haki. It is all in your head. He lost in clash. His stamina came down because of the prolonged fight. Not once it was implied that he was losing stamina because of lifting island.
All this debate has nothing to do with no.2. It is just ambiguous relevant to Luffy's opponents.
Post automatically merged:
There isn't anything civil. It is pointless to discuss when it is confirmed who is no.2.
Old Ray got stalemated and struggled against a non serious Kizaru....Who later got 1 shotted by Luffy. The old age argument can't work because Garp was the same age, and still did better against a stronger admiral + half a yonko crew, then Ray did against Kizaru in a 1v1
Ryuma is a wanked fodder who was used as a foot soldier by Moria and whos best feat is killing a dragon, which Punk hazards SH's ate for breakfast
Ryuma is a wanked fodder who was used as a foot soldier by Moria and whos best feat is killing a dragon, which Punk hazards SH's ate for breakfast