Speculations What Oda has in mind with Buggy ?

#28
Because it ties into what I was saying to begin with - Buggy being related to Rocks.
Couldnt figure it out on your own?
No, because the word second son you extrapolated out of context, as in the same phrase/scene Shanks is called first son, as such buggy is considered the "second son" of the crew, and shanks the "first".
I know for you reading english is hard.
 
#29
In the end, Buggy has been called the 2nd son by Oden and that is obviously going to end up somewhere.
I say it ends up with him being the 2nd son of the guy with an identical wanted poster and LinLin has nearly the same.
He was the only other known apprentice on the ship

Regarding the D, he probably has no clue that he belongs to that clan.
But he should.... Would the Roger pirates just never tell him about his heritage? That's borderline cruel......

Oh and he's also white....
 

nik87

Kitetsu Wanker
#31
No, because the word second son you extrapolated out of context, as in the same phrase/scene Shanks is called first son, as such buggy is considered the "second son" of the crew, and shanks the "first".
I know for you reading english is hard.
And I say Buggy is 2nd son of Rocks and has nothing to do with Shanks.
Watch me end up right, again.
But he should.... Would the Roger pirates just never tell him about his heritage? That's borderline cruel......

Oh and he's also white....
How would they tell him he is a D if they didnt know either?
So is Big Mom.
 
#36
What was I wrong about in that post?
I dont concern myself with the details or rather the path, I am focused on the end goal/result.
Oda will whip up any explanation he deems fit for those questions you asked.

In the end, Buggy has been called the 2nd son by Oden and that is obviously going to end up somewhere.
I say it ends up with him being the 2nd son of the guy with an identical wanted poster and LinLin has nearly the same.

Regarding the D, he probably has no clue that he belongs to that clan.
Here.
You says he's called second son because he's the second of Xebec.
Then Why is Shanks called first in the same dialog?

Please take the L this is just silly.
 

nik87

Kitetsu Wanker
#37
Here.
You says he's called second son because he's the second of Xebec.
Then Why is Shanks called first in the same dialog?

Please take the L this is just silly.
As I said, I dont concern myself with why Shanks was called the 1st son.
Where was I wrong about saying Buggy is 2nd son of Rocks?
You do know the result of this claim has yet to be determined?
Or you just want me to be wrong that bad?
 
#38
As I said, I dont concern myself with why Shanks was called the 1st son.
Where was I wrong about saying Buggy is 2nd son of Rocks?
You do know the result of this claim has yet to be determined?
Or you just want me to be wrong that bad?
Come on you're being thick on purpose.
Buggy gets called second son, you say there is an hidden meaning.
In the same phrase, Shanks gets called first son, but now there is no hidden meaning.
So the same description (first son, second son) is given to two people in the same role (apprentice) in the same discussion in the same context but one has a hidden meaning.
The only explanation is that Shanks is the secret first son of somebody, but it's already been refuted last chapter.
Please acknowledge that this is your line of thought and realise how contradictory you're being.
 

nik87

Kitetsu Wanker
#39
Come on you're being thick on purpose.
Buggy gets called second son, you say there is an hidden meaning.
In the same phrase, Shanks gets called first son, but now there is no hidden meaning.
So the same description (first son, second son) is given to two people in the same role (apprentice) in the same discussion in the same context but one has a hidden meaning.
The only explanation is that Shanks is the secret first son of somebody, but it's already been refuted last chapter.
Please acknowledge that this is your line of thought and realise how contradictory you're being.
I didnt say there is no hidden meaning regarding Shanks, I said I dont know what it means.
Get your facts straight instead of wishing so hard that I end up wrong.
Once again, I dont care what it means in case of Shanks, I am only interested in Buggy being Rocks' 2nd son.
 
#40
I didnt say there is no hidden meaning regarding Shanks, I said I dont know what it means.
Get your facts straight instead of wishing so hard that I end up wrong.
Once again, I dont care what it means in case of Shanks, I am only interested in Buggy being Rocks' 2nd son.
But there is no hidden meaning for Shanks.
It was shown last week him being born.
Please take the L.
 
Top