Questions & Mysteries Who is the Monster Samurai?

Who is the Monster Samurai?


  • Total voters
    93
  • Poll closed .
#61
And yet Izo didn't use Oden's nitoryu against Kaido. You know, the attack Kaido used to compare them to Oden? Kaido was likely only comparing those who cut him to a 'monster samurai' since he regarded Oden so highly for scarring him. Then comes Zoro who, while wielding Oden's sword, scarred him. Wonder if that was a coincidence.
Izo is a samurai regardless your argument is invalid.
Post automatically merged:

100% it is Zoro.

1. Momonosuke barely knows how to wield, let alone fight with a sword.

2. No matter how badly rubber boys want it to he Luffy, he is not a Samurai. Literally nothing about him is Samurai like, basic thing is to fight with a sword....I do not see one 😐

Monstrous Samurai is Zoro :cheers:
Izo doesn't use a sword.

:kata:
 
#70
Izo is a samurai regardless your argument is invalid.
Post automatically merged:



Izo doesn't use a sword.

:kata:
My argument wasn't whether or not Izo was a samurai, I was undermining your implication that since Izo is a samurai, Luffy must therefore be one, as if they have equal portrayal as such. Izo being a samurai doesn't give him significance in the narrative by default, nor does it immediately compare him to Oden or Ryuma, yet you're suggesting Luffy's not just a samurai, but will be a samurai who's significantly compared to Oden and/or Ryuma, despite not being able to scar or even cut Kaido, cutting him being the event that created this 'Monster samurai' quote in the first place.
 
#73
He did before he left Wano. Now cope it's Zoro and will never be luffy :suresure:

Yeah and he stopped using a sword so does that mean because he stopped using a sword he's no longer a samurai?

I think not.
Post automatically merged:

My argument wasn't whether or not Izo was a samurai, I was undermining your implication that since Izo is a samurai, Luffy must therefore be one, as if they have equal portrayal as such. Izo being a samurai doesn't give him significance in the narrative by default, nor does it immediately compare him to Oden or Ryuma, yet you're suggesting Luffy's not just a samurai, but will be a samurai who's significantly compared to Oden and/or Ryuma, despite not being able to scar or even cut Kaido, cutting him being the event that created this 'Monster samurai' quote in the first place.
Luffy has been compared to Oden lmao did you forgot the panel where Kaido asked how high will Luffy's ceiling go and he compared him to Oden.

That's more comparison to Oden than Zoro has ever got this arc. Being a monster samurai isn't about scarring him but about beating Kaido and Luffy is going to do that and Zoro won't.
 
#75
Luffy has been compared to Oden lmao did you forgot the panel where Kaido asked how high will Luffy's ceiling go and he compared him to Oden.

That's more comparison to Oden than Zoro has ever got this arc. Being a monster samurai isn't about scarring him but about beating Kaido and Luffy is going to do that and Zoro won't.
A single panel of people significant to the narrative at that point whom Kaido considered strong is greater comparison than Zoro taking up Oden's legendary blade that no one else could wield, given to him by Oden's daughter, and then scarring Kaido with it. All this after defeating and returning the blade of Wano's national treasure revered for centuries as the sword god of wano, the one eyed swordsman who slayed a dragon to save the capital? Sure thing, no bias there...

If being a monster samurai isn't about scarring kaido then why did his speech about such a samurai and explicit comparison of Oden only happen after the scabbards failed to do so?
 
#76
Yeah and he stopped using a sword so does that mean because he stopped using a sword he's no longer a samurai?

I think not.
Post automatically merged:



Luffy has been compared to Oden lmao did you forgot the panel where Kaido asked how high will Luffy's ceiling go and he compared him to Oden.

That's more comparison to Oden than Zoro has ever got this arc. Being a monster samurai isn't about scarring him but about beating Kaido and Luffy is going to do that and Zoro won't.
Izo was a samurai because he used a sword (not his pistols). Luffy isn't one, has never been called one and he doesn't see himself as one (cause he doesn't use a sword).

:holdthisl:
 
#79
A single panel of people significant to the narrative at that point whom Kaido considered strong is greater comparison than Zoro taking up Oden's legendary blade that no one else could wield, given to him by Oden's daughter, and then scarring Kaido with it. All this after defeating and returning the blade of Wano's national treasure revered for centuries as the sword god of wano, the one eyed swordsman who slayed a dragon to save the capital? Sure thing, no bias there...

If being a monster samurai isn't about scarring kaido then why did his speech about such a samurai and explicit comparison of Oden only happen after the scabbards failed to do so?
A monster samurai is in reference to someone being able to beat him. Kaido called Oden a monster samurai because Oden had the potential to beat him when the fought which was why he was angry the old woman interfered as it stopped him having a 1 v 1 with someone with the strength to challenge him.

Kaido said to the scabbards they weren't monster samurai's because after their attack it did no where near the damage Oden did and he didn't view them as worthy.

Why would he only view someone who could scar him a monster samurai that makes no sense it makes much more sense that he views someone as a monster if they can actually beat him.

When Zoro scarred him he didn't mention Zoro being a monster or anything in fact he shrugged him off a mere nuisance.
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
β€Ž
#80
A monster samurai is in reference to someone being able to beat him. Kaido called Oden a monster samurai because Oden had the potential to beat him when the fought which was why he was angry the old woman interfered as it stopped him having a 1 v 1 with someone with the strength to challenge him.

Kaido said to the scabbards they weren't monster samurai's because after their attack it did no where near the damage Oden did and he didn't view them as worthy.

Why would he only view someone who could scar him a monster samurai that makes no sense it makes much more sense that he views someone as a monster if they can actually beat him.

When Zoro scarred him he didn't mention Zoro being a monster or anything in fact he shrugged him off a mere nuisance.
Monster samurai is someone who can KILL him not beat him after he ran a 16 man gauntlet.
When he spoke to the scabbards he was talking about them KILLING HIM
 
Top