Youre still saying the same thing, except you changed the words from Air Bar to CoC blasts so why act like you never said it?
Besides, Ikoku is a confirmed Elbaf swordsmanship technique.
Yet it doesn't cut Kid at all.
Gan Modoki is a confirmed Oden Nitoryu technique.
Which again doesn't cut at all.
Zoro's pre-ts Hawk Wave also does not cut.
So what gives?
This is a slashing technique, because Big Mom slashed:
Big Mom's Ikoku doesn't feel like a cutting technique (swordman ability) to me, but a shock wave that pulverizes everything that passes
Databook is not a good enough argument, shown several times wrong does not have enough credibility
But even if you count this technique as a cutting technique, it won't refute my argument at all. Incidentally, WB used his sword to cut BB. Big Mom used a swordsmanship skill to cut the Kid's mechanical bull. King used his swordplay skills to fight CQC against Zoro
The difference is: sword users like Big Mom, Whitebeard, King, Kizaru, Fujitora and etc, even if they have sword skills, they don't use cutting skills as the main weapon in their arsenal. So they don't meet the WSS criteria
Zoro using a technique other than slashing a few times doesn't affect the fact that his swordsmanship is his primary weapon.
Just like in the manga, it always exaggerates Mihawk's abilities as his swordsmanship skills.
The manga exaggerates Zoro's abilities being his swordsmanship skills.
Meanwhile, the manga exaggerates Shanks' abilities being his haki, not his swordsmanship
For example, which is more reasonable to think about Shanks' final attack?
Being a cutting attack capable of slashing an island?
Or an immense golden Nordic God created by your CoC?
I would say 100% for sure that the CoC skill is the most likely, and anyone who is unprejudiced and is mentally healthy should believe that too.
[automerge]1661703807[/automerge]
You didn't even read anything I said
Ikoku Sovereignty. Canonically proven a swordsmanship attack yet does exact same shit as Roger's.
Gan Modoki. Literally showed you a panel of Oden using it and the people he uses it on are pushed away while they cough blood from mouth. No cuts on body.
Roger's attack literally looks like any other sword air attack, and behaves exactly the same way as two swordsmanship attacks. Thus, it is a fucking swordsmanship attack.
Again, you didn't even read shit. Chill the fuck out and please read what other people say before responding.
I was referring to explicit choice of showing Kamusari panel as reference while talking about how Roger's blade is one of top 12 graded swords in Vivre Card. Why show a panel for reference where the sword is barely visible and the attack has nothing to do with swordsmanship, according to you?
Did you just correlate Roger's technique with Big Mom's technique without using any arguments in favor of it, just making it up and saying they look like the same technique? Sometimes I skip this kind of argument because the lack of evidence is too shallow to make me argue against it.
