Questions & Mysteries Why was Roger not WSS?

This is a slashing technique, because Big Mom slashed:


Big Mom's Ikoku doesn't feel like a cutting technique (swordman ability) to me, but a shock wave that pulverizes everything that passes
Databook is not a good enough argument, shown several times wrong does not have enough credibility

But even if you count this technique as a cutting technique, it won't refute my argument at all. Incidentally, WB used his sword to cut BB. Big Mom used a swordsmanship skill to cut the Kid's mechanical bull. King used his swordplay skills to fight CQC against Zoro

The difference is: sword users like Big Mom, Whitebeard, King, Kizaru, Fujitora and etc, even if they have sword skills, they don't use cutting skills as the main weapon in their arsenal. So they don't meet the WSS criteria

Zoro using a technique other than slashing a few times doesn't affect the fact that his swordsmanship is his primary weapon.
Just like in the manga, it always exaggerates Mihawk's abilities as his swordsmanship skills.
The manga exaggerates Zoro's abilities being his swordsmanship skills.
Meanwhile, the manga exaggerates Shanks' abilities being his haki, not his swordsmanship

For example, which is more reasonable to think about Shanks' final attack?
Being a cutting attack capable of slashing an island?
Or an immense golden Nordic God created by your CoC?

I would say 100% for sure that the CoC skill is the most likely, and anyone who is unprejudiced and is mentally healthy should believe that too.
Post automatically merged:



Did you just correlate Roger's technique with Big Mom's technique without using any arguments in favor of it, just making it up and saying they look like the same technique? Sometimes I skip this kind of argument because the lack of evidence is too shallow to make me argue against it.
The entire post is to show you swordsman abilities aren't always cutting abilities.

Hawk wave, Ikkoku and Oden's attacks are examples.

We're not showing you they're cutting attacks. We're showing you exact opposite to prove attacks like Roger's are part of swordsmanship.

Are you really going to pretend "two sword style" isn't about swordsmanship though lmao.

You've established in your head that all swordsmanship attacks are cutting attacks, using it as a fact, then using it to deny actual evidence that not all swordsmanship attacks are cutting attacks. And that other swordsmen use similar attacks to Roger's all the time
 
Well, swordsisters? Why was Roger not World's Strongest Swordsman?
  • He carried a sword
  • He fought with a sword
  • He used haki in fights
  • He loved his sword to name his son after it
and yet he was not WSS. Why is that?

Mihawk never once was used in the same sentence as Roger. He was never compared to Roger. Zoro never once thought about Roger as his goal or even in general.
Why is that?

Mihawk as WSS was seeing himself inferior to old Whitebeard who was WSM.
While Roger was being compared as prime Whitebeard's equal and superior. Why is that?
Mihawk fanboys thinking about the answer:

 
??
They are NOT cutting Techniques since we obviously see them not cut on panel.

Oden Nitoryu does not mean "Two Swords" it means "Two Sword Style", and is the exact same thing Oden says before he uses Paradise Totsuka and other Cutting Techniques.

Essentially I showed you 3 confirmed Swordsmanship Techniques which don't cut. So there is really no basis for your argument to be correct.
Does Zoro use gusts of wind as his main fighting style?
Does Oden use CoC bursts as his main fighting styles?
No, you just took random panels that don't prove anything against my argument.


Ashura isn't a cutting technique, 9 Sword Style Silver Mist & Dead Man's Game are cutting Techniques. And I already proved that Swordsmanship is not limited to just cutting techniques.
Besides the point is that you saying that "creating some God form" is not Swordsmanship does not hold any weight because Zoro already creates a form and that comes under Swordsmanship.
Ashura is an aura that Zoro literally creates to cut harder.
Soon, a swordsmanship skill

But you are deciding on your own what is considered as swordmanship and then are using that to prove what is and isn't swordsmanship. You are basically saying those that you think use swordsmanship use swordsmanship and those that you don't think use it don't use it
"deciding for yourself" lmao.
I'm literally saying that:
Characters who use cutting skills as their main fighting style = use swordmanship = enter the swordman criteria and compete for the WSS title.

Characters who don't use cutting skills as their main fighting style = don't use swordmanship = don't qualify for swordsman and don't compete for the WSS title.

That's a 2+2=4
 
Roger wasn't swordsman because he wasn't WSS
Rayleigh wasn't swordsman because he wasn't WSS
Xebec wasn't swordsman because he wasn't WSS
Fujitora wasn't swordsman because he wasn't WSS
Oden wasn't swordsman because he wasn't WSS
Shanks isn't swordsman because he isn't the WSS
Zoro isn't a swordsman because he isn't the WSS

:risitameh:
 

ConquistadoR

The Rogue Prince
Does Zoro use gusts of wind as his main fighting style?
Does Oden use CoC bursts as his main fighting styles?
No, you just took random panels that don't prove anything against my argument.
Zoro's Nitoryu IS Swordsmanship & Nitoryu: Hawk Wave is a Swordsmanship Technique that doesn't cut.
Oden Nitoryu IS Swordsmanship & Oden Nitoryu: Gan Modoki is a Swordsmanship Technique that doesn't cut.

So saying that Swordsmanship is only limited to cutting techniques is WRONG. Roger's Divine Departure can very well be a Swordsmanship Technique which does not cut.

I have broken it down to an extent where even a primary school kid can understand, ofcourse if they want to understand instead of throwing tantrums.

Ashura is an aura that Zoro literally creates to cut harder.
Soon, a swordsmanship skill
Ashura is a aura that Zoro creates to use 9 Sword Style which allows him to cut.
Ashura itself isn't Swordsmanship by your dumb logic.
 
"deciding for yourself" lmao.
I'm literally saying that:
Characters who use cutting skills as their main fighting style = use swordmanship = enter the swordman criteria and compete for the WSS title.

Characters who don't use cutting skills as their main fighting style = don't use swordmanship = don't qualify for swordsman and don't compete for the WSS title.

That's a 2+2=4
ok and what is this based on?
 
Does Zoro use gusts of wind as his main fighting style?
Does Oden use CoC bursts as his main fighting styles?
No, you just took random panels that don't prove anything against my argument.




Ashura is an aura that Zoro literally creates to cut harder.
Soon, a swordsmanship skill



"deciding for yourself" lmao.
I'm literally saying that:
Characters who use cutting skills as their main fighting style = use swordmanship = enter the swordman criteria and compete for the WSS title.

Characters who don't use cutting skills as their main fighting style = don't use swordmanship = don't qualify for swordsman and don't compete for the WSS title.

That's a 2+2=4
It means that gusts of wind are part of being a swordsman.

It means that CoC bursts can be part of being a swordsman.

It proves that Ikoku, which is a blast shockwave, is part of being a swordsman because it's literally called swordsmanship.

It means that it can all come under WSS because Zoro is sure as fuck allowed to use Hawk Wave as it's part of his arsenal.

It means that your take that "If a sword strike sends you flying instead of cutting you, it's not a swordsmanship attack" is beyond false. Proven by three different scenarios. Specially by BM, where it's literally labelled as swordsmanship.

Characters who use cutting skills as their main fighting style = use swordmanship = enter the swordman criteria and compete for the WSS title.

Characters who don't use cutting skills as their main fighting style = don't use swordmanship = don't qualify for swordsman and don't compete for the WSS title.
Except Ikkoku is canonically confirmed to be swordsmanship and it's not cutting.

You're denying canon over your head-canon. This is not 2+2, this is you deciding what's right by yourself then saying Manga is wrong. Shockwave attacks can be part of swordsmanship.
 
I had the same question as you. And I believe the answer is simple.
If you are the strongest swordsman but not the strongest over all they will call you the “strongest swordsman”.
If you are a swordsman and you are the strongest in the world they will just say he is the strongest man in the world.
But also I think that people like Mihawk, vista, oden, zoro are considere swordsman, not because they fight with swords but because they dedicate their fighting style and life to the sword.
Roger, Rayleigh, shanks, Kaku, king, even arlong had a sword, are not considered swords man, not because they are not talented with swords but because they don’t dedicate their life to the sword.
Every sword man until now had a sword style.

oden- oden sword style
Zoro- three sword style
Vista- flower sword style
And many more

this is the difference I think
 
Zoro's Nitoryu IS Swordsmanship & Nitoryu: Hawk Wave is a Swordsmanship Technique that doesn't cut.
Oden Nitoryu IS Swordsmanship & Oden Nitoryu: Gan Modoki is a Swordsmanship Technique that doesn't cut.

So saying that Swordsmanship is only limited to cutting techniques is WRONG. Roger's Divine Departure can very well be a Swordsmanship Technique which does not cut.

I have broken it down to an extent where even a primary school kid can understand, ofcourse if they want to understand instead of throwing tantrums.


Ashura is a aura that Zoro creates to use 9 Sword Style which allows him to cut.
Ashura itself isn't Swordsmanship by your dumb logic.
It means that gusts of wind are part of being a swordsman.

It means that CoC bursts can be part of being a swordsman.

It proves that Ikoku, which is a blast shockwave, is part of being a swordsman because it's literally called swordsmanship.

It means that it can all come under WSS because Zoro is sure as fuck allowed to use Hawk Wave as it's part of his arsenal.

It means that your take that "If a sword strike sends you flying instead of cutting you, it's not a swordsmanship attack" is beyond false. Proven by three different scenarios. Specially by BM, where it's literally labelled as swordsmanship.



Except Ikkoku is canonically confirmed to be swordsmanship and it's not cutting.

You're denying canon over your head-canon. This is not 2+2, this is you deciding what's right by yourself then saying Manga is wrong. Shockwave attacks can be part of swordsmanship.
gust of wind and gust of CoC is not a swordsmanship technique and there is no shit to back it up. I'm still waiting for a solid argument that confirms this being a swordmanship, just using nitoryu naming fallacy that doesn't explain anything.

There is also nothing that confirms Ikoku being a swordmanship, databook is not reliable enough material and every month something leaks that confirms this

ok and what is this based on?
There is something called logic. Reasonable people support their argument with sound logic.
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
gust of wind and gust of CoC is not a swordsmanship technique and there is no shit to back it up. I'm still waiting for a solid argument that confirms this being a swordmanship, just using nitoryu naming fallacy that doesn't explain anything.

There is also nothing that confirms Ikoku being a swordmanship, databook is not reliable enough material and every month something leaks that confirms this



There is something called logic. Reasonable people support their argument with sound logic.
Shanks final attack in the movie is burning sword style acoc attack
 

ConquistadoR

The Rogue Prince
gust of wind and gust of CoC is not a swordsmanship technique and there is no shit to back it up. I'm still waiting for a solid argument that confirms this being a swordmanship, just using nitoryu naming fallacy that doesn't explain anything.
Nitoryu naming fallacy? The fuck are you on?
Oden Nitoryu essentially means "Oden Two Sword Style" and Oden says that before he uses any move, including Togen Totsuka - the one which scarred Kaido. Same with Zoro & him saying Nitoryu.
You cannot claim that only cutting techniques come under swordsmanship while ignoring these.

And at this point, you are outright refusing to acknowledge what's there in the canon while still sticking by your own "logic" which is not supported by the manga. Basically debating in bad faith.

There is also nothing that confirms Ikoku being a swordmanship, databook is not reliable enough material and every month something leaks that confirms this
It is not from the databook, it is directly from Big Mom's Vivre Card. I've already said this.

Just stop the denial & accept you are wrong. You won't lose Internet Points for that.
 
Nitoryu naming fallacy? The fuck are you on?
Oden Nitoryu essentially means "Oden Two Sword Style" and Oden says that before he uses any move, including Togen Totsuka - the one which scarred Kaido. Same with Zoro & him saying Nitoryu.
You cannot claim that only cutting techniques come under swordsmanship while ignoring these.

And at this point, you are outright refusing to acknowledge what's there in the canon while still sticking by your own "logic" which is not supported by the manga. Basically debating in bad faith.


It is not from the databook, it is directly from Big Mom's Vivre Card. I've already said this.

Just stop the denial & accept you are wrong. You won't lose Internet Points for that.
Are you still in this shit?
Oden saying "two-sword style" doesn't mean it's a swordsmanship skill. You are using a fallacy as an absolute truth when it is just a fallacy and you have no solid reason to support your argument.
 

ConquistadoR

The Rogue Prince
Are you still in this shit?
Oden saying "two-sword style" doesn't mean it's a swordsmanship skill. You are using a fallacy as an absolute truth when it is just a fallacy and you have no solid reason to support your argument.
A swordsman using a Sword style and using two swords to execute a move isn't swordsmanship now.
Something canonically confirmed in the VivreCards to be Elbaf Swordsmanship, isn't swordsmanship now.

Because it does not align with your made up "logic" & beliefs.
 
I had the same question as you. And I believe the answer is simple.
If you are the strongest swordsman but not the strongest over all they will call you the “strongest swordsman”.
If you are a swordsman and you are the strongest in the world they will just say he is the strongest man in the world.
But also I think that people like Mihawk, vista, oden, zoro are considere swordsman, not because they fight with swords but because they dedicate their fighting style and life to the sword.
Roger, Rayleigh, shanks, Kaku, king, even arlong had a sword, are not considered swords man, not because they are not talented with swords but because they don’t dedicate their life to the sword.
Every sword man until now had a sword style.

oden- oden sword style
Zoro- three sword style
Vista- flower sword style
And many more

this is the difference I think
Kaku is a swordsman and uses a 4 sword style.




We don't know Mihawk sword style just like we don't know Roger and Shanks sword style. We don't even know Ryuma's sword style.
 
Top