So then You lied
I asked you “what makes someone better at swordsmanship” and you said “a sword duel”
now you’re saying that actually the person with “better swordsmanship” can lose a “sword duel” remain “better at swordsmanship”
So then Your previous answer was a lie. Now let’s return to the original question, “what makes someone better at swordsmanship?”
It seems like an easy question and yet here you are lying to find an answer
I asked you “what makes someone better at swordsmanship” and you said “a sword duel”
now you’re saying that actually the person with “better swordsmanship” can lose a “sword duel” remain “better at swordsmanship”
So then Your previous answer was a lie. Now let’s return to the original question, “what makes someone better at swordsmanship?”
It seems like an easy question and yet here you are lying to find an answer
Better at swordsmanship in what sense? Because both apply
If you mean who’s better at swordsmanship when it comes to how skilled they are at actually using swordsmanship than zoro pre enma is better than king.
If you mean who’s better at swordsmanship when it comes to who’d win a sword duel someone less skilled can still win. So in that case they are stronger aka better