Problem is that here THE AUTHOR acknowledged the parallel, unlike in other circumstances
So what? I love that you try to compare a thread based on the writer's speculation with a thread based on something acknowledged by the author, yeah truly the same thing
I agree that every narrative parallel is a coincidence... unless the author himself goes as far as give his explicit acknowledgement
See the difference? I believe you can see it
So what? I love that you try to compare a thread based on the writer's speculation with a thread based on something acknowledged by the author, yeah truly the same thing
I agree that every narrative parallel is a coincidence... unless the author himself goes as far as give his explicit acknowledgement
See the difference? I believe you can see it