I dont think two characters clashing equally in op means they are equally strong do you?
so why would I think a clash of conquerors would imply that they are.....
your conclusion from my claim is nonsensical.
That's the implication from your claim that COC = how strong you are.
This means when characters clash equally in COC, it means they are equally strong
it does affect your point cause its not at all a contradiction
wasnt that your point?
by getting stronger , your coc gets stronger indirectly. simple enough?
...
That's the implication from your claim that COC = how strong you are.
This means when characters clash equally in COC, it means they are equally strong
It doesn't vary for the user. It means you can't use 5% of your COC strength or 50% of your COC strength
It is a contradiction since training to get stronger would drrectly be training your COC. According to your logic that COC is how strong you are.
"It doesn't vary for the user. It means you can't use 5% of your COC strength or 50% of your COC strength"
no lore or story evidence provided on this at all so head-canon territory
"That's the implication from your claim that COC = how strong you are.
This means when characters clash equally in COC, it means they are equally strong"
again we dont measure how strong people are in clashes do we
so why would that be the conclusion from an equal clash of conquerors........
am getting tired of repeating the same thing before you understand it
"It is a contradiction since training to get stronger would drrectly be training your COC. According to your logic that COC is how strong you are."
according to what the story says coc is correlated with how strong the user is .
yeah I will see myself out
not about to explain the difference between directly and indirectly .
again we dont measure how strong people are in clashes do we
so why would that be the conclusion from an equal clash of conquerors........
am getting tired of repeating the same thing before you understand it
first, thats just a casual ACoC punch from Luffy and not like any named move, let alone the final move. second, the enemy is Kaido, not King, so the effect is different on its enemy.
So here's a key thing you are missing. Zoro's attacks are on a continuum. You have zoro's king of hell 3 sword style, which uses considerably smaller CoC streaks(even when compared to Luffy's). And then you have the king of hell 3 dragon style, which uses the giant streaks.
The fact that zoro has 2 styles depending on how much CoC he is outputting leads me to believe that 3 dragons style is a sort of ultimate form for zoro(at least haki-wise). 3 dragons is when he is going all out with his haki without holding anything back. This makes sense as Zoro said he needed to end the fight soon.
In any case, zoro clearly didn't low diff him if he had to use 3 dragon style. And while zoro was using his CoC at full force, we've yet to really see Luffy do this. Luffy's CoC attacks so far were just his casual punches, mostly just no-named attacks.
Post automatically merged:
This is something I've noticed ever since 1010. Zoro fans continuously try to downplay Luffy's mastery of CoC by comparing Luffy's weakest attacks with zoro's strongest.
And I'd definitely put jet culverin in the "weakest" category. Its a speed based form.
Similiar to that and how Sanji was also given a new named PU, I'm pretty sure that Luffy will most likely get a new named arsenal aswell, indicating internal destruction CoC usage.
And that's also what that Jet culverin lacked, as it seemingly made physical contact.
So people seriously need to hold their horses, before junping to conclusions
Zoro still gets low diffed by Luffy. Albert just gets neg diffed, no comparison. Luffy was splitting skies from a basic punch, Zoro out here fighting a pretty boy who stands no chance to characters with acoc to begin with.
Zoro still gets low diffed by Luffy. Albert just gets neg diffed, no comparison. Luffy was splitting skies from a basic punch, Zoro out here fighting a pretty boy who stands no chance to characters with acoc to begin with.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.