Good morning
Yesterday, flower and noctis casted vote on Alibaba.
I came in and build a case on it.
Though there are many inactives but I do agree with flower on Alibaba.
He is active but not at all contributing. He has 6 pages of content. And, ALMoST all of the posts are fluffs - talking about kurumi or waifus or some other manga.
No reads.
On day 0 he voted for drago
Didn't see him voting on day 1.
But two players kind of struck me off.
Here, Miss Nat agreed that alibaba is on his scum meta
She's not wrong eeeh Alibaba is on his scum meta.
I guess
So when flower asked her to vote him then she refused. I mean nat is the one who doesn't like No Lynch, wants kill to happen so number of players get reduced, so I am unable to understand why she refused to cast vote on someone whom she is reading as scum.
I refuse
If you look at his posts, it's mostly all about characters and waifus, he's not doing
any game solving. He hates being scum, so that's why.
Another person I wanna question is Mr. Panther.
He subs in. I am sure he lacks reads that we build over past few days.
So in matter of alibaba, he says that he isn't understanding the point of voting alibaba as there is no argument
the thing is, i understand that point, but when i asked for arguments, there just comes "trust me". Trust must be earned, so give me arguments. Specially you 2B should go pretty well with some quotes which makes the claim viable, from my experience with you.
I quote my own case on him to present the argument
However, he kind of looked in denial mode to buy it and refuted my arguments with
1) everyone is making fluffs
2)does anyone has knowledge on Alibaba meta as scum for sure
But i mostly see fluff from everyone here, including myself. Does he usualy play different?
But did we anything different the last pages? Not really. So show me the different behavior 2B. If you cant, thats strange for me. Specially from you, little detektive.
I could have bought this but let me remind you that he just subbed in and you don't expect a sub to defend someone like this. He could have simply said that I don't know about alibaba so let me take a look at his posts. But nah...he simply seem in mood to negate the arguments against Alibaba.
Please both of your elaborate the position you took on the matter