Dude, one attack landed, the other was blocked. The comparison fails at the most basic level, let alone when factoring in everything else (placement, reinforcement, attack potency, lethality etc.)
This is like wearing a bullet proof vest, taking bullets to the gut, breaking a couple ribs but staying conscious and thinking that somehow translates to taking a punch clean to the chin by a boxer and not getting KOd.
The bullet rounds obviously pack way more of a punch than a human fist, yet surviving the former doesn't stop you from getting knocked out from the latter. This is just a stupid comparison all around.
Apples to oranges.
This is like wearing a bullet proof vest, taking bullets to the gut, breaking a couple ribs but staying conscious and thinking that somehow translates to taking a punch clean to the chin by a boxer and not getting KOd.
The bullet rounds obviously pack way more of a punch than a human fist, yet surviving the former doesn't stop you from getting knocked out from the latter. This is just a stupid comparison all around.
Apples to oranges.
You can see the force of the attack being absorbed by Zoro.
The swords didn't nullify the attack in the slightest.
The facts here are that Hakai is an island busting attack.
Zoro stopped the entire force (absorbed also) momentarily breaking all his bones
That alone is a better endurance feat than Luffy getting knocked out by Ragnarok which didn't even break any bones.