So what do you say now that someone did jump on it?
Who? Udell? I meant if someone will jump on it and follow it lol.
Udell's reaction is the opposite. He's questioning it.
The king is not guaranteed to be town
I know. I was King last time and was the Evil King and Unseen.
Usopp stated several questionable things.
As I said earlier, I skimmed some of Usopp vs Lind since I was at work then. I'll probably read them in more detail later, but it would help if you could point out what was questionable to you.
fact that the very same king is trying to lynch someone while contradicting himself
Again, what I said above. I skimmed them so please let me know which post it is, Imma check it later.
means we have to look at him and your response is that we shouldn't therefore what you stated was a defense.
You're reaching here. I said he shouldn't be the focus. We can deal with him. Sooner or later we will see what faction the King belongs to. He can't keep it hidden for long. As I said, he shouldn't be the absolute focus of the day. Of course you, and everyone else, are free to question Usopp, and we should, but the King shouldn't take up the focus of D1. I am not defending Usopp, I don't know his alignment. My entire point is that the King should be observed and then we decide what to do, but he shouldn't be the focus.
Also I am more inclined to lynch the player that simply wants to sheep.
T-Pein?
Well if it is a fact that doesn't mean what he did was towny in anyway.
I didn't say it was towny though. You're adding words to my statement. What I said was that T-Pein has a tendency of doing so. I didn't say it was in any way alignment indicative or whatever.
I fail to see how Lind is scum or cult in this situation. If town agrees with Ekko I need to know exactly why because if Lind flips town I want to know who we should look at.
I think no one has voted for Lind since then, so I am not sure if anyone actually agrees with Susopp.
I have a good feeling that I have you caught.
Nah, you've missed, by a lot lol.
This one and previous one.
You were scum last game (al' game).
In which you town read me lol.
I trust my reads so if I see players trying to avoid anything that would hint to their alignment it usually means they are not town.
I mean sure that's good, but I am telling you you're misreading me now lol.
Again I would like to keep games separate. The past is irrelevant.
But we can't do that lol. That's where meta reading comes from. I can't just say yo forget all the other games if/when I see someone doing something that I know is alignment indicative or a tell of theirs.
My primary point is that randomly voting for players serves no purpose (unless you did it early i.e page 1), no amateur will fall for that at this point in the game.
It's testing out the wagons and seeing who is ready to sheep and on whom.
