You didn't see Roger fight... say what?
We didn't? Are you sure about that?
As I said, wielding a gun on the one hand and a sword on the other one.
Unless you also believe that Roger is taking a photo shooting, this panel makes it clear that he uses every weapon as a tool to extend his combat skills.
No.
Zoro fought with fists and a sickle.
Yeah, because he can still perform his swordsmanship with his fists and arms - and now try to use your swordsmanship on guns.
Excuses, illogical87.
Does that make him a boxer and a sickleman?
As long as Zoro can perform his swordsmanship as usual, nope.
And now it's your turn to prove Roger can perform swordsmanship even without swords, I will wait.
Roger is clearly a swordsman.
Roger is clearly NOT a swordsman.
Heck, even that character, which you admire so much, doesn't give a single fuck about Roger being a swordsman or one of his goals to surpass.
Just tell me if you are done daydreaming about that, okay?
You can see that he takes on his strongest opponent with a sword and nothing else.
You can see that he takes on one of his strongest opponents with a sword,
a gun and nothing else.
The denial has gone through the roof.
Hilarious, it's exactly coming from you, lol.
If he took on WB with a pistol you could have some argument but this is just plain silly.
Dude, he took on Shiki with a sword and a gun - your entire argument on Roger being a swordsman based on this single panel is invalid.