Obviously not. Like I said to someone else, changing the goalpost isn't the way to call a strawman. Everything I said was the result of your own contradictory logic and refusal to properly address them.
You: "Anyone that's shows red in any way should be erased!"
Guy: "Like all humans including yourself? Cause our blood is red.."
You: I never said blood is a factor! Strawman!"
That's how you're using it.
- A character NEEDS all of this. What i'm saying is that none of this needs to be set in the past. I can't be clearer than that. Don't twist my words please ;)
All of the SHs were good characters BEFORE becoming a SH. You're claiming that Carrot will get them AFTER becoming a SH aka she isn't a good character now. When people repeatedly questioned you about this, you claim it's a bad faith argument.
- Carrot has something right now, it's just subtle. Same don't twist my words.
With your own actions and logic, Carrot has nothing. As I said before, you yourself basically admitted that Carrot lacks anything to make her a SH right now, so you argue she'll get them later.
Even now, you claim that the things going for her right now are subtle, aka the opposite of what Oda has done with the other SHs. Nine times in a row Oda wasn't subtle, so why would he be subtle for Carrot alone?
Lastly, what even is this subtlety that you keep talking about but never explain?
- Indeed, the story puts Yamato as a advantage on the surface, but this is most likely a red heering, this is true.
And you also claimed that Carrot's utter lack of importance and character, and being placed in the background, is just Oda's trick. Once again, your own logic says Carrot doesn't have anything good.
- All of the theories are statement about the story (yours and mine included) are assumption, what we have are only panel, not the truth about the future of the characters.
You're the only one here making "theories," and have also called your own arguements "logical" assumptions. Theories also require evidences, which once again shows a contradiction with your posts.
An assumption is a conclusion without proof or evidence so which is it?
Finally I'm not sayin that you hate me because I make assumption I'm saying that you are too biased to consider the possibility to be wrong. That's different. Some people are hatefull but we don't really care about them.
It's the same thing. You're deflecting arguments as bad faith because you assume people are bias for not agreeing with you. Doesn't matter if it's hate since that would still mean they are biased.
TL;DR: You know Carrot doesn't have anything going for her right now so you claim she'll get them later, which requires Oda to do the opposite of what he's been doing all this time. Only thing sustaining this are your own assumptions like Jack returning in an arc about Carrot, and that anyone who disagrees with you are just biased.