This is why I'm not talking about proof anymore but "the best analysis possible". In short, the best theory possible. The same way a cosmological theory can sometimes only approach reality by numbers.
That's what I'm doing here. My knowledge is the science, the narrative reasonning are the numbers. Simple as that.
The same way, the story elements points toward Carrot joining the strawhat.
The same way some have to create theorems, functions, experimentations. Neologisms are just words. What those words are describing is real. I'm only doing something NO ONE did until now. It's not about bias, it's about process. And I already proved that I had no bias in my process. If you want me to copy paste the entire post I made yesterday to do that, I can, but I'm not sure that you read it the first time so I won't bet on a second.
I'm a expert in the field, and right now, I'm the ONLY expert in the field that CARED to dive deeper in the analysis of the storytelling One Piece. So trust, me, you won't find no reliable consensus on the subject. Plus, the actual "consensus" is like the church defending the Geocentricmodel in front of Gallileo.. IT's not rationnal, it's a cult as I explained here:
So you will excuse me if I don't find the actual consensus reliable on a rationnal and narrative level.
Wrong. SHe has been relevant to the point of an arc character is relevant : Rebecca / Kyros / Shiraoshi / Vivi / Wiper etc..
This is not "to the point of the strawhat", if that was the case, Yamato would have some strong strawhats qualities : A post, a strong dynamic with the crew. This is not the reality of the story
Only to you and some members here. I can assure you that a lot of people think the opposite. It's not a good argument.
There is. In fact I would go as far as saying that the Shining Nakama action of Carrot is one of the strongest exemple of this principle as it is one of the longest.