????
I said i was referring to the 48h claim
It's pretty clear you're pressured considering not only you're much more active now than before, but you're trying to push a case of me being a liar based on a wrong assumption the moment you feel you're cornered
So one question now for you
- When you read the opening post, did you read the DP1 being exceptionally 48h or not?
No. It's because you lied about what I said. It's pretty fucking clear Bogard.
The Liar said:
At the beginning, i was only joking, but i find it suspicious that he decided to ask a less experienced mafia player about mafia setup instead of believing what he presumably read in opening posts, and then later on turning back the clock into claiming he didn't read it at all.
Reread this.
How is one supposed to not think you're referring to the Opening Post? You phrased it in such a deliberate way as to make it sound like I later said "No wait, I didn't read the OP haha." This is dishonesty at its worst and the most generous view is that you weren't careful when phrasing your wording, but again, given your sudden push with no coherent reason, I am not feeling generous to you.
No, Bogard. I didn't see it; Because I further went on to ask NeutralWatcher in my second fucking post about what he meant.
But I guess this is some grand scum strategy, asking about the game set up and interacting with players! I would've gotten away with it too if it wasn't for you Bogard. Nothing gets past you, huh???
On mobile atm, so can't requote myself well, but if you read the entire discussion i was having with TAC, you'd see i was referring to the 48h claim, not the opening post in itself
I even mentioned it once again to TAC here
But he persisted in trying to portray me as a liar regardless
I wouldn't call you a liar if you didn't lie. You purposefully phrased it in a manner that put me in a worse light.
In fact, that's all you've done this entire game. Tell me why it's bad to talk to Neutralwatcher?