- Status
C
calling u liar or anything could been his way of defending I don't think it is even serious thing ppl sometimes call each other worse words
I honestly don't see much of this case I felt like it was overblown from both sides
is there any other player u sus ? or do u have another reason why u think he is scum ?
I honestly don't see much of this case I felt like it was overblown from both sides
is there any other player u sus ? or do u have another reason why u think he is scum ?
I am not beating around the bush 
if u want ppl to follow your plan u gotta do it yourself that's what I said
who u gonna vote ?
I
if u want ppl to follow your plan u gotta do it yourself that's what I saidwho u gonna vote ?
I
What if you wanted to say the answer similar to what i am saying?
Why I am under any obligations to answer question asked by myself to please you?
I agree with Reborn, doing nothing and don´t voting in the first day means we losing the chance to get more details(vote details) and also the better perspective to find the scums. Yes if we don´t vote anyone we probably don´t most like losing a townie, but if we don´t do that now today we also gonna have problems later. We need reactions/vote details and also better perspetive. I my thoughs I still not have a clear opinion which I should vote then(the discussing between Neutral and Sera are very suspect in my eyes, for some reason they can´t stop attacking each other).
N
@Reborn
Seraphoenix basically said
I sus him because he was okay with D1 lynch in a previous game.
He expect me to sus Bogard since he is okay with D1 lynch just like Seraphoenix.
The difference is
I sus Seraphoenix after I saw his night action + okay with lynch on D1
I didn't sus Bogard because I haven't seen his night action even though just like Seraphoenix he was okay lynch on D1
Seraphoenix basically said
I sus him because he was okay with D1 lynch in a previous game.
He expect me to sus Bogard since he is okay with D1 lynch just like Seraphoenix.
The difference is
I sus Seraphoenix after I saw his night action + okay with lynch on D1
I didn't sus Bogard because I haven't seen his night action even though just like Seraphoenix he was okay lynch on D1
C
it is you who beating around the bush I just don't like why you except everyone to agree with u when u don't follow on it and lmao why i would say something similar to u ?
if anything u should stop being stubborn and cooperate with others more
and for answer I sus Rej and All Red rn the most but since both inactives I would rather we deal with them at night and for lynch either HA , Don
if anything u should stop being stubborn and cooperate with others more
and for answer I sus Rej and All Red rn the most but since both inactives I would rather we deal with them at night and for lynch either HA , Don
Have you skipped the whole thread? Quote instances when I am not cooperating with others.
The only instance is when I asked everyone two questions by taking initiative on my own. Infact, I did clarify in that post itself that I will answer after everyone will answer. So what makes you think that amounts to non cooperation when I took the lead of asking questions and not others?
Also, why you want HA to Lynch?
Yiu
The only instance is when I asked everyone two questions by taking initiative on my own. Infact, I did clarify in that post itself that I will answer after everyone will answer. So what makes you think that amounts to non cooperation when I took the lead of asking questions and not others?
Also, why you want HA to Lynch?
Yiu
The insult isn't the reason i have him as sus. As you said, it happens everytime in mafia games. It's the fact he said it continuously even after i clarified to him what i meant. You can read this post to see how the discussion went in order: https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/forum/threads/round-08-tokyo-ghoul.4223/page-16#post-367808
And he did this on a misinterpretation i clarified to him
So now, i'm just waiting for his explanation as to why he went to such lengths to portray me as a liar
As for the rest, there is a small Neutral vs Seraphoenix battle nitpicking on a meta game from a previous game, worth watching out, but not really conclusive
Then there is Kiwipom who tried to play diplomatic at the beginning during the TAC vs Bogard debate, by explaining why didn't buy my reasoning, when i believe she'd go straight to the point when acting as town, but this is just a slight suspicion based on meta, nothing much concrete about it.
For Lanji, i think he supported TAC at one point in his misinterpretation of my statement, which i think could have been a mafia influence trying to support a townie lynch, but since it was just one post, i may have been reading too much about it
I believe Dragonmir and Reborn are town however because they engaged in scum hunting by giving good reads, asking the right questions, and helping town to progress when needed
You also initially misread me, but i think you're trying to understand the situation, and asking the right questions, so because of this, i'd lean more on you being town
Finalbeta had a shift in arguments, from buying my initial "slip" argument on TAC, to realizing it wasn't a "slip" and thinking of me as sus, but i view it more as him being a townie trying to find scum, he may have a wrong read of me imo, but i think he is town
For the rest, i have no clear read on them at the moment, but i feel that some of the inactives need to post more
And he did this on a misinterpretation i clarified to him
So now, i'm just waiting for his explanation as to why he went to such lengths to portray me as a liar
As for the rest, there is a small Neutral vs Seraphoenix battle nitpicking on a meta game from a previous game, worth watching out, but not really conclusive
Then there is Kiwipom who tried to play diplomatic at the beginning during the TAC vs Bogard debate, by explaining why didn't buy my reasoning, when i believe she'd go straight to the point when acting as town, but this is just a slight suspicion based on meta, nothing much concrete about it.
For Lanji, i think he supported TAC at one point in his misinterpretation of my statement, which i think could have been a mafia influence trying to support a townie lynch, but since it was just one post, i may have been reading too much about it
I believe Dragonmir and Reborn are town however because they engaged in scum hunting by giving good reads, asking the right questions, and helping town to progress when needed
You also initially misread me, but i think you're trying to understand the situation, and asking the right questions, so because of this, i'd lean more on you being town
Finalbeta had a shift in arguments, from buying my initial "slip" argument on TAC, to realizing it wasn't a "slip" and thinking of me as sus, but i view it more as him being a townie trying to find scum, he may have a wrong read of me imo, but i think he is town
For the rest, i have no clear read on them at the moment, but i feel that some of the inactives need to post more
Except I never bought it.
I mentioned how I was finding your argument about TAC not genuinely missing the 48h notion convincing, until then you also mentioned the slip part. And TAC never actually slipped. In fact reading OP and missing a part of it doesn't equate slipping, and I only agreed about TAC not genuinely missing that part.
You then kept reiterating that TAC was accusing you of lying despite you had implied he had committed a slip and instead there happened to be none up the table. Hence he was actually rightful to keep susing you.
So you putting words into my mouth is not a good look here.
I mentioned how I was finding your argument about TAC not genuinely missing the 48h notion convincing, until then you also mentioned the slip part. And TAC never actually slipped. In fact reading OP and missing a part of it doesn't equate slipping, and I only agreed about TAC not genuinely missing that part.
You then kept reiterating that TAC was accusing you of lying despite you had implied he had committed a slip and instead there happened to be none up the table. Hence he was actually rightful to keep susing you.
So you putting words into my mouth is not a good look here.
On sera vs NW case....it seem like case of both misinterpreting each other arguments. Both are nitpicking...
However, NW case seem more strong than sera. There is also something about sera which is off
This is the question which sparked off the argument.
The implication of this statement is sera thinks NW is considering Bogard as sus but wants to clarify whether the ground of NW sus is lynch vote.
Now This is NW respone
Nw respone is based on logical deduction of sera first post.
but later sera twisted the question
This question has different implication than what he asked first because This question implies that sera is asking whether NW sus Bogard?
It more of nitpicking but to me NW response is fine and consitent but there is inconsistency in sera posts.
Also, If sera thinks Bogard took it too far then doesn't this apply on him as well because his reasoning is also tin foil based on not so concrete ground. Yet, here he is wary of bogard for pushing too far but end up doing the same
This is what I understood about their situation.
However, NW case seem more strong than sera. There is also something about sera which is off
This is the question which sparked off the argument.
The implication of this statement is sera thinks NW is considering Bogard as sus but wants to clarify whether the ground of NW sus is lynch vote.
Now This is NW respone
Nw respone is based on logical deduction of sera first post.
but later sera twisted the question
This question has different implication than what he asked first because This question implies that sera is asking whether NW sus Bogard?
It more of nitpicking but to me NW response is fine and consitent but there is inconsistency in sera posts.
Also, If sera thinks Bogard took it too far then doesn't this apply on him as well because his reasoning is also tin foil based on not so concrete ground. Yet, here he is wary of bogard for pushing too far but end up doing the same
This is what I understood about their situation.
Then quote the full fragment, not just a small piece:
since TAC had read the OP and yet somehow missed the cycles description part which was odd in that very basic
This is what I say next.
Where do I mention that he slipped? My post only says that I also believed that he didn't miss the 48h notion, so you are putting words into my mouth here.
And this is what I wrote in the very next post:
since TAC had read the OP and yet somehow missed the cycles description part which was odd in that very basic
This is what I say next.
Where do I mention that he slipped? My post only says that I also believed that he didn't miss the 48h notion, so you are putting words into my mouth here.
And this is what I wrote in the very next post:
- Status