Why's it so hard to accept Lunarians having better durability than Kaido when their flames are on? Oda had Zoro use the exact same attack on Kaido and King to illustrate the difference, where Kaido's skin was cut and King didn't get a single scratch.
Tbf i do think oda retconned kings powers mid raid
Because we definitely saw Marco and zoro make king bleed with their attacks but then all of a sudden shishisonson couldn't make him bleed but onigiri could
When it comes to marco you can technically still argue his Phoenix flames have a weird effect on king's flames but eh idk
Either way the king that bled from onigiri and the one that didn't against shishisonson seem different
Very likely.
If Kong Organ does no damage in Flame On, if Teach's Black Hole is doing nothing to Flame On; there is absolutely no way Marco's knee is doing anything to that.
Shit ZoNa fans down bad this week so it seems 🦊 and the others are still fighting s bear and s hawk
But he is the only one who know their weaknest seraphim Slayer incoming
Its like when people go to McDonald's only for the fries and leave the rest of that bullshit on the menu. Its the only part of king Thats worth something. His weapon trash, fighting style trash, devil fruit trash, gimp suit trash.
btw if you throw water at a lunarian's flame it should extinguish it right
don't you guys find it interesting that lunarians have the same weakness as DFs
Nah it's durability also .
Durability the ability to withstand wear, pressure, or damage.
Which come back to my point of saying Kaido can take stronger attacks which mean he has higher durability .
They also tried to copy Kaido's DF. With the CP0 guy, believing it was a failure, said "thank goddness it was a failure". Being a Dragon-Oni Hybrid is most certainly > Lunarian body. Sure, you can damage and cut Kaido, but not only is Kaido extremely tough, he has crazy endurance and recovery.
Luffy just compared the Seraphim's durability to Kaido's, that's why. Before this, I would've agreed that King has slightly higher durability, but now Luffy is confirming it himself.
It's weird how zoro for idk 3rd or 4th time had to explain how to hurt lunarians without ever mentioning conquerors coating is needed
Like believing you need conquerors coating to beat lets say s-shark is an insane take
Especially with all the times oda had to repeatedly highlight how to hurt lunarians that dont involve that
Even if coating can hurt lunarians which at this point I doubt because zoro didn't. That doesn't change the fact you can still hirt them without it if you attack while their flame is off
Luffy just compared the Seraphim's durability to Kaido's, that's why. Before this, I would've agreed that King has slightly higher durability, but now Luffy is confirming it himself.
btw if you throw water at a lunarian's flame it should extinguish it right
don't you guys find it interesting that lunarians have the same weakness as DFs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
