They also tried to copy Kaido's DF. With the CP0 guy, believing it was a failure, said "thank goddness it was a failure". Being a Dragon-Oni Hybrid is most certainly > Lunarian body. Sure, you can damage and cut Kaido, but not only is Kaido extremely tough, he has crazy endurance and recovery.
"Practically invincible" so there is some context there.
We add the fact that the Seraphim were stated to need testing in order to determine the level of attack to take with flame on, which wouldn't be the case of they were just invincible
King has proven that speed and AP are in his favor, Blazing Bagua aside.
That's why they are mad. Kaido isnt losing to King in just one stat but multiple.
Then I don't understand why you are not seeing Oda is implying that Kings durability is superior.
Luffy was able to damage Kaido despite him getting up. Here we have Luffy doing no damage and the serpahim getting up. We then have Zoro saying they're basically invincible with their flames own providing further support they did no damage.
Why these two idiots are not using ACoC is stupid but from those few points alone it's obvious Oda is implying Kings Durability sits beyond Kaidos.
Obviously King would get bodied by Kaido since his other attributes aren't up to par but it's obvious what Oda is implying here
Though now this also confirms beyond a shadow of doubt that Marco did no damage at all in that one Panel you, @RayanOO and @Psalm have spammed at me to death.
Nor did Zoro's Onigiri.
Tbf i do think oda retconned kings powers mid raid
Because we definitely saw Marco and zoro make king bleed with their attacks but then all of a sudden shishisonson couldn't make him bleed but onigiri could
When it comes to marco you can technically still argue his Phoenix flames have a weird effect on king's flames but eh idk
Either way the king that bled from onigiri and the one that didn't against shishisonson seem different
It's weird how zoro for idk 3rd or 4th time had to explain how to hurt lunarians without ever mentioning conquerors coating is needed
Like believing you need conquerors coating to beat lets say s-shark is an insane take
Especially with all the times oda had to repeatedly highlight how to hurt lunarians that dont involve that
Even if coating can hurt lunarians which at this point I doubt because zoro didn't. That doesn't change the fact you can still hirt them without it if you attack while their flame is off
Lol give it a chapter or two where they are not going out of flame on mode and then zoro next line of reason was the only time king started blocking and dodging was with adv coc then luffy and zoro both will shine and lucci/kaku will be amazed
I still put him above King for the simple fact i feel kaido can take stronger moves .
If Kaido or King fighting someone that doing ACoC moves i see kaido take the more hits .
Then I don't understand why you are not seeing Oda is implying that Kings durability is superior.
Luffy was able to damage Kaido despite him getting up. Here we have Luffy doing no damage and the serpahim getting up. We then have Zoro saying they're basically invincible with their flames own providing further support they did no damage.
Why these two idiots are not using ACoC is stupid but from those few points alone it's obvious Oda is implying Kings Durability sits beyond Kaidos.
Obviously King would get bodied by Kaido since his other attributes aren't up to par but it's obvious what Oda is implying here
Luffy just compared the Seraphim's durability to Kaido's, that's why. Before this, I would've agreed that King has slightly higher durability, but now Luffy is confirming it himself.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.