Spoiler One Piece Chapter 1077 Spoilers Discussion
- Thread starter Absalom
- Start date
- Status
You're still not answering my question.
Zoro knows Luffy can use CoC and still tells him to attack Flame Off.
Why?
Again, he needed it to beat King before Enma killed him.
Not in generally.
As @nik87 said, this forum is one CoC attack on Flame On Lunarian failing, away from being an utter Salt mine.
Zoro knows Luffy can use CoC and still tells him to attack Flame Off.
Why?
Again, he needed it to beat King before Enma killed him.
Not in generally.
As @nik87 said, this forum is one CoC attack on Flame On Lunarian failing, away from being an utter Salt mine.
Aside from the fact thay u are pertaining a contextually false reason to zoro's AP increase.. Which was he had to conquer enma and meet its standards like zoro himself stated and in that moment he used Coc to do exactly that is what transpired and not that him realising that king is invincible and just awakened Acoc to surpass his limit or whatever.
(which is what zoro wanted "surpass his current limit" agajn Daz bones who unlike King was portrayed to be invincible)
Which provides a loop hole coz AP is useless when you can just wait for him to lower his flames not only that it also proves that AP was a bi-product of zoro exerting his haki to its fullest.
It is logically erroneous to assume AP was needed to BEAT king when King literally has the most obvious vulnerability introduced and established and the notion of King being absolutely invincible or need AP to beat is nowhere to be deduced
If AP was needed (as the main catalyst of the fight) there would have been more backing that notion up than It being introduced as a mere biproduct to something that was an irrelevant answer to king's supoosed invincibility that you claim.
Lets not forget zoro was on a timer so AP was useful since zoro was desperately trying to finish this quickly
But that doesn't mean he couldnt beat king without that AP given the aforementioned technicalities and problems with the notion
Your claim as you can see twists the narrative and mischaracterizes their contexts
(which is what zoro wanted "surpass his current limit" agajn Daz bones who unlike King was portrayed to be invincible)
Which provides a loop hole coz AP is useless when you can just wait for him to lower his flames not only that it also proves that AP was a bi-product of zoro exerting his haki to its fullest.
It is logically erroneous to assume AP was needed to BEAT king when King literally has the most obvious vulnerability introduced and established and the notion of King being absolutely invincible or need AP to beat is nowhere to be deduced
If AP was needed (as the main catalyst of the fight) there would have been more backing that notion up than It being introduced as a mere biproduct to something that was an irrelevant answer to king's supoosed invincibility that you claim.
Lets not forget zoro was on a timer so AP was useful since zoro was desperately trying to finish this quickly
But that doesn't mean he couldnt beat king without that AP given the aforementioned technicalities and problems with the notion
Your claim as you can see twists the narrative and mischaracterizes their contexts
Luffy knows about Kaido's durability and acquires a specific ability --->
Kaido didn't lose or get low diffed
Katakuri's secret is known---> doesn't lose to Boundman and tanks 3 moves nor shortly after
Lasts hours and still matches fs g4 in the end.
When awakened law and kid bypass BM durability---> she tanks even more offscreen and on screen
Doesn't lose badly
When it comes to King: loses in 3 moves *low diff to EnOu zoro
Kaido didn't lose or get low diffed
Katakuri's secret is known---> doesn't lose to Boundman and tanks 3 moves nor shortly after
Lasts hours and still matches fs g4 in the end.
When awakened law and kid bypass BM durability---> she tanks even more offscreen and on screen
Doesn't lose badly
When it comes to King: loses in 3 moves *low diff to EnOu zoro
- Status