- Status
Dude whole day he didn't play like fool.
if he wanted to be lynched then why would he claim butler during phase one? He could have gone with no claim like DA did on first day? No..he claimed and people cleared him in phase one.
Saying guilty in phase two doesn't equate to being fool
So you were under the control?. you could have dropped hints.
But you didn't.. you are experience player yet you chose to play fool instead of trying to drop hints that you are under control? Not convincing
if he wanted to be lynched then why would he claim butler during phase one? He could have gone with no claim like DA did on first day? No..he claimed and people cleared him in phase one.
Saying guilty in phase two doesn't equate to being fool
So you were under the control?. you could have dropped hints.
But you didn't.. you are experience player yet you chose to play fool instead of trying to drop hints that you are under control? Not convincing
You can't drop hints when under control. That's never the case in any game ever.
Also @LANJI CUCKSMOKE
V
Already said this a while back, but now I'm completely sure he's Fool
Also @LANJI CUCKSMOKE
V
Already said this a while back, but now I'm completely sure he's Fool
There is a limit to how much you assume.
Too much and it create confusion and help scums
And, you are least trust worthy here after what you pulled yesterday.
Tell me, if you were controlled then why you didn't claim this right at the beginning of day 3?
Why you said this instead?
When someone gets controlled then the player is notified. I am sure if you got controlled then you would be notified because last game when kiwi and playa controlled me then I got notified by the host
What are you trying to confirm?
Too much and it create confusion and help scums
And, you are least trust worthy here after what you pulled yesterday.
Tell me, if you were controlled then why you didn't claim this right at the beginning of day 3?
Why you said this instead?
When someone gets controlled then the player is notified. I am sure if you got controlled then you would be notified because last game when kiwi and playa controlled me then I got notified by the host
What are you trying to confirm?
@Yo Tan Wa what you think of cinera and flower situation?
not another one 🤦♂️
damn we need to get Fool out soon, it keeps messing with our cases.
I can do something about it, bt first i need to be sure of NW being BD.
Both Tac n Queen behavior is unusual.
Thing i find odd,
Butler is like a unique role, for Cinera to claim it, it's definitely asking to get lynched.
Bt if he really wanted to get lynched, he would have role claimed sooner, so Sera would have testified against it and he woulf be lynched. Or not claim it, like Reborn said. Cinera could have gone offline and he would have been lynched.
damn we need to get Fool out soon, it keeps messing with our cases.
I can do something about it, bt first i need to be sure of NW being BD.
Both Tac n Queen behavior is unusual.
Thing i find odd,
Butler is like a unique role, for Cinera to claim it, it's definitely asking to get lynched.
Bt if he really wanted to get lynched, he would have role claimed sooner, so Sera would have testified against it and he woulf be lynched. Or not claim it, like Reborn said. Cinera could have gone offline and he would have been lynched.
So Sera claims Butler..
Initially I did. But when going back to make my strategy, I went to the wiki to quote the killing powers. I saw the cooldown and decided that Nat's statement is a lot less suspicious because of that. Her early insistence on Unseen / not trusting NeutralWatcher early on is off. Because, IMO, it was good to trust NeutralWatcher before this kerfuffle expanded alongside his own self doubt.
Okay, so you didn't understand my plan Reborn. My idea is to not lynch until we get the best reads on everyone we can. Consistent reads.
We can find the Cult Leader in page 1, I am convinced of this. After the other cult positions are filled out, we can do our best to scum read. Once we are sure we have plenty of suspects, we can go ahead and lynch them ASAP. We do it in bulk so they can't recover as quickly. Savvy?
Don't humor yourself. I'm perfectly fine with lynching you. I just don't think we can win this game in the normal method, not without blind luck. And I do not like blind luck.
Initially I did. But when going back to make my strategy, I went to the wiki to quote the killing powers. I saw the cooldown and decided that Nat's statement is a lot less suspicious because of that. Her early insistence on Unseen / not trusting NeutralWatcher early on is off. Because, IMO, it was good to trust NeutralWatcher before this kerfuffle expanded alongside his own self doubt.
Okay, so you didn't understand my plan Reborn. My idea is to not lynch until we get the best reads on everyone we can. Consistent reads.
We can find the Cult Leader in page 1, I am convinced of this. After the other cult positions are filled out, we can do our best to scum read. Once we are sure we have plenty of suspects, we can go ahead and lynch them ASAP. We do it in bulk so they can't recover as quickly. Savvy?
Don't humor yourself. I'm perfectly fine with lynching you. I just don't think we can win this game in the normal method, not without blind luck. And I do not like blind luck.
I'll accept that my strategy is unorthodox. But let's look at the deck we've been handed Yotan. We can't trust our two TI claims. I just skimmed the last 8 pages and it seems NeutralWatcher's even less of a solid source now? There's some issue with messed up results, he claims? As of last night, Nat was a big source of suspicion.
So, in my remedy to this, we manage to play in a way that let's not rely on TI. But on consistent reads.
So, in my remedy to this, we manage to play in a way that let's not rely on TI. But on consistent reads.
- Status