Why did York Betray Vegapunk?


  • Total voters
    274
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
weren't you part of those who claimed yamato almost one shotted aramaki because he had white eyes though he had no blood nor bruise either
No lol, she just gave him a bad headache.
1. Kaido is not a Serpahim. They are 2 different characters.
Kaido being a dumbass loser has nothing to do with Seraphim lmao. His performance and jobbing has nothing to do with how Seraphim reacts to damage

2. Kaido was drunk.

Go back to licking your daddy's taint
" Kaido ith not a theraphim acthually!!11 🤓"
He got hit by a strong attack. He tanked it even though his eyes went white.
SeraJimbe got hit by a strong attack. He tanked it even though his eyes went white.
Never thought I'd have to fucking explain something so simple but I guess Admiral wankers don't have the braincells to actually read anything that isn't glazing Papazuki's dick.
 
The only one crying is you bitchfan
Good luck with a good writing for loro maybe after ten years 😂
:choppawhat: Who are you calling bitchfan?
Post automatically merged:

:believe:
Will you start calling me racist as well cuz I stan Zoro.
Post automatically merged:

Lmao give it up y'all bullying one person.
Let him enjoy once in a while sanji panel.
:kobeha::kobeha::kobeha::kobeha::kobeha:
Nah I'm tired of these retards with these dog shit arguments.
 
You are so braindead you need everything spelled out for you?

When you put on underwear do you also call your daddy to the help you put it on?

Here's the showing where the emotionless and orders obeying cyborg is shown reacting to in flame mode to Sanji's casual attack:


So when there no statements suddenly he's not being damaged?

So Luffy only damaged Kaido once on the roof?

such as? Is Kaido being damaged here and how you determine that?
There is no showing or statement that S-Shark is damaged

When there is no showing or statement that a character is damaged then the logical conclusion is that the character was not damaged.

If you can't understand that then it only means;
You are so braindead
^
 
There is no showing or statement that S-Shark is damaged

When there is no showing or statement that a character is damaged then the logical conclusion is that the character was not damaged.

If you can't understand that then it only means;

^
answer me if specifically these attacks in these 5 panels are damaging Kaido. Yes or No.
If yes, tell me what where it says or shows that.
 
No lol, she just gave him a bad headache.

" Kaido ith not a theraphim acthually!!11 🤓"
He got hit by a strong attack. He tanked it even though his eyes went white.
SeraJimbe got hit by a strong attack. He tanked it even though his eyes went white.
Never thought I'd have to fucking explain something so simple but I guess Admiral wankers don't have the braincells to actually read anything that isn't glazing Papazuki's dick.
Kaido is not S-Shark, dipshit
S-Shark is not as weak as Kaido. S-Shark is not as emotional as Kaido.
Shit, S-Shark is even a better character than Kaido.

Kaido being a drunk jobber who goes white eye'd from Luffy, has absolutely nothing to do with S-Shark reacting to damage from Sanji.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top