Not sure how you came to the conclusion that Shanks offense shits on Kaido's when Kaido has one shot comparable characters physically in just base form lol...but w.e, just typical recency bias.
There was no sneak attack. Shanks jumped in front of Kid and Kid even said « red hair » before Shanks used Kamusari. Did Kaido sneak attack Luffy in part 1 because he failed to react to Thunder Bagua ?
No...it will be high diff....and no..I am not talking about Shanks > Roger...I am saying this attack looked more impactful than Oden took...and of course, that is just Roger half assed attack....
Does zoro cut an opponent every time he swings his sword at them? The question you should be asking yourself is this …. Zoro , Roger and shanks all coat their swords in Adv Coc haki and swing it . Why is only zoro a swordsman in my eyes and Roger and shanks I have to wait to see more ???? I’ll give you the answer to that right now buddy …..because you’re coping
I think we can at the very least agree that the fact the attack didn't cut oden or kid is at least a little weird
Even if we don't agree on the why its the case
its different
but then again several examples of sword attacks that dont leaves visible marks after getting hit so the entire premise is weird. you use a sword to attack, thats swordsmanship ....
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.