[FNZ] Role Madness Jujutsu Kaisen Mafia - Shibuya Incident [Game Ended = Mafia + Traitor + Neutral Indie Won!]
- Thread starter Emil
- Start date
- Tags gojo > sukuna midnight is a simp nanami rachet-chan
- Status
@MonochromeYoru , @T-Pein™ , @ConquistadoR , @Kiku , @Dr. Watson, @Joygirl , @Midnight Delight , @Naomi, @Mr. Reloaded, @MitchMatch , @Orwellian , @MangoSenpai , @Underworld Broker
Please vote
Please vote
J
Vote lynch Psylocke
Did you notice how opportunistic and all over the place she is? First voting Naomi (did she explain why by now?), then she wants to keep her because "she is too funny" After that she she wants to take our throne by accusing us of TMI and despite not voting us (is she afraid of our royal status and how bad she might look for going after her queen?) suggest that we should get assassinated for the reason of not liking the way we express ourselves. Basically the same nonsense reason NikaInParis was voting us previously. While at the same time Naomi spamming is called funny. Mighty double standards, wouldn´t you agree? But this is not the end yet. Between those posts she simply hanged on to vote for Midnight only because Ultra was asking for it. And ultimately she changed her vote to hime and dipped. All of her votes were basically given without explanations and she looks very inconsistent to us.
Did you notice how opportunistic and all over the place she is? First voting Naomi (did she explain why by now?), then she wants to keep her because "she is too funny" After that she she wants to take our throne by accusing us of TMI and despite not voting us (is she afraid of our royal status and how bad she might look for going after her queen?) suggest that we should get assassinated for the reason of not liking the way we express ourselves. Basically the same nonsense reason NikaInParis was voting us previously. While at the same time Naomi spamming is called funny. Mighty double standards, wouldn´t you agree? But this is not the end yet. Between those posts she simply hanged on to vote for Midnight only because Ultra was asking for it. And ultimately she changed her vote to hime and dipped. All of her votes were basically given without explanations and she looks very inconsistent to us.
J
Those numbers are assumptions made by experience as player and as creator (host). Let me educate you, peasant: For this assasination mechanis to work without being too one-sided in either town´s or scum´s favour it must be guaranteed that this is somewhat balanced like a scale. There is the possibility that the assassins are 1 town, 1 indie, 1 maf. But if the town indie dies it automatically would immediately become scumfavoured and the other way around. With that high number of players there is a good possibility that there are two scum teams. If we created a mafia round with such mechanis and two scum teams we would give each mafia team one assassin and to make up for this giving town two assassins. Plus our consent is that there is most likely an indie assassin too, right? So if one town assassin dies it might not automatically turn into scum´s favour completely as the two mafia assassins would be from different teams and could possibly be assassinating each other or the team members from the opposing team too.
The biggest point is however that the assassins are depending on the person who is giving them their orders as well as Ultra´s suggestion that town should get together and giving that person a recommendation which player they want to see dead. We would personally add that as soon as the first town assassins falls dead we should all rethink this mechanic and either only publically nominate players we are 100 % sure of or make it clear that the person giving the orders should simply stop giving them.
The biggest point is however that the assassins are depending on the person who is giving them their orders as well as Ultra´s suggestion that town should get together and giving that person a recommendation which player they want to see dead. We would personally add that as soon as the first town assassins falls dead we should all rethink this mechanic and either only publically nominate players we are 100 % sure of or make it clear that the person giving the orders should simply stop giving them.
well your play based criticisms are that she’s all over the place and opportunistic, yes?
they amount to roughly the same thing, and it’s a trait that isn’t really scummy - what ‘opportunities’ is she taking in your eyes, and would it be better if she just tunnelled one person, or did nothing at all?
they amount to roughly the same thing, and it’s a trait that isn’t really scummy - what ‘opportunities’ is she taking in your eyes, and would it be better if she just tunnelled one person, or did nothing at all?
It's day one, so idk what to think yet
But from the posts so far, the sketchiest people seem to be:
- Joygirl - her role play might unironically be some sort of Binding Vow, the arrogance smells like Sukuna
- Ultra - probable assassin, and who can promise he won't target town tonight
- the inactive players - don't know much about them, but inactivity could (doesn't have to) point towards scum. But there's too many inactive guys
But from the posts so far, the sketchiest people seem to be:
- Joygirl - her role play might unironically be some sort of Binding Vow, the arrogance smells like Sukuna
- Ultra - probable assassin, and who can promise he won't target town tonight
- the inactive players - don't know much about them, but inactivity could (doesn't have to) point towards scum. But there's too many inactive guys
- Status