No, I took issue with Tweet giving a vague town read on the leading wagon that was not going to actually shake it at all. This is not an argument, but it struck me as possible tmi. By that I mean, the thought popped into my head as I read it.
So let's start with A. I invite you to pick which of Mitch's first 9 posts you think Tweet could skim over and come to a town read from. Mind, he didn't cite any specific one, just a very general "vibes townie".
Then with B, yes, I said the one post I quoted was not good. It was sheeping. I didn't follow it up further, and my vote came much later, primarily because he had done next to nothing by that point (read: null) and there were mechanical considerations, as well as the earlier sheeping.