There is no consensuns and it is a matter of ideology. Weither you like it or not.
Well I'm sorry but you are plainly just wrong and you are in denial of science. Meaning that you are still in the paradoxe of both believing and not believing in science.
So unless you resolve that conflict of your and go read some actual science. I can't discuss more with you on that point.
I never said I don't believe in science.
You just proved it here:
There is no consensuns and it is a matter of ideology. Weither you like it or not.
You deny a scientific consensus.
You just proved that global data is superior than someone who are involved into it.
No, you proved nothing but the relative appreciation. You confuse emotion and feeling with fact and data.
. So you are in a paradoxe.
Still no.
You pick what science benefits your woke agenda and excludes what science doesn't.
Still no.
Again. Paradoxe. Hypocrisy. You just chose what benefits for you and deny what doesn't
I don't deny anything. You are. You are both believing in science and both in denial of a scientific consensus. Don't try to make your way out of a subject with fallacious arguementation.
Even that you wrongly claim that I'am atheist.
First lie. I ask you the question. Didn't claim anything. I don't like liers, careful.
Again. Paradoxe. Hypocrisy. You just chose what benefits for you and deny what doesn't.
NO again. When you are a woman you are the most well placed to know what women live. Just like an atheist is the most well placed to define what atheism and their belief or absence of beliefs are. Not you.
1 - You didn't proved to me a shit. We just agreed on. I never said non-scientific sources were equal or more valuable than scientific ones. Although there is many possibilities that this may be the other way around. And there is no consensun on the difference between sex and gender. That's woke agenda only.
Indeed, I underestimated your lack of self honesty. On the first message where I called you out on your denial of scientific consensus you should have understood your problem.
I asked you a clear question. So yes. You did tell me that scientific source where more valuable than non scientific one. There is no "other way around". Accept the reality of your replies.
And there is STILL a consensus. I asked actual scientist, and looked at actual scientist studies. You didn't.
2 - You just proved that you avoid real debate simple because someone is not involved or doesn't have scientific degree to rely on the subject.
There is no need for debate if you are in denial of a scientific consensus.
If anything you just prove more and more that you are a woke.
Ok I will ad you to the list
if I'm not a man I can't talk about how to be a woman or how a woman feel etc.
No you can't, that's basic respect. You can of course quote scientific research on the live of women, but you are not to be talk at their places. If you don't understand that, we might indeed have a problem but this is not a problem of ideology rather than a problem of respect for other people.
Putting people who are involved FIRST is the first necessary step to understand what they live. This is not a "woke" thing, that's a basic respect thing.
If you are honest you should stop not pretend that you are a woke. I'm not even trying to change you opinion I know you are a lost case. But at least you could be a honest lost case instead of pretend to be virtuous.
Oh, I'm am woke. But not in the way you think I am. I'll come back to that lateronce more people reply to my question.
Noted
Bet
Noted