Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei must go gaolang > your fav is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
The fact that you even put stock in peer reviewed sociological papers shows what a tool you are. You are aware so many of them reference and cite each other in a cyclical nature where none of them can even be proven? Yet, through being peer reviewed in a biased setting they become 'fact'.
Just admit it. You cannot truly differentiate between both as they are based on a subjective experience (Identity).
Ultimately, we have to trust the mentally ill, or divergent, that their reality is true, rather than being a fabrication.
People called that teen who tried transitioning into a Korean mentally ill... what is the difference? Both tried to alter immutable traits through external medical processes.
Transracial is as legit as Transgender.
Just admit it. You cannot truly differentiate between both as they are based on a subjective experience (Identity).
Ultimately, we have to trust the mentally ill, or divergent, that their reality is true, rather than being a fabrication.
People called that teen who tried transitioning into a Korean mentally ill... what is the difference? Both tried to alter immutable traits through external medical processes.
Transracial is as legit as Transgender.
I care about true science. Anything that is tested based on subjective control elements isn't science, its pseudo science. There is no way to prove transgender is ""real"". There is no scan that shows it. We have to trust the divergent individual's word on it.
Furthermore, as Trans individuals have a vested interest in their own identity, they are biased subjects for testing in the first place.
Hence, if that is real, then those who have genuinely identified as Black have a claim to it under your viewpoint. A white man can claim to be black as much as he can claim to be a woman.
Furthermore, as Trans individuals have a vested interest in their own identity, they are biased subjects for testing in the first place.
Hence, if that is real, then those who have genuinely identified as Black have a claim to it under your viewpoint. A white man can claim to be black as much as he can claim to be a woman.
Real/True science is something that can be replicated with proper control groups and can be proven through repetition. Sociological testing is always subjective. It's not science.
When you have to trust: "Bro, believe me, I am a (x)," be it race, gender, whatever -- and then purport that such beliefs constitute real scientific study, then you're just plain wrong, lmao.
Hence my argument "Transracial is as real as Transgender." If you deny one, you're denying the other, Mr. Logik. For the record, I think you're right. There is no transracial, at least as something that isn't a subform of mental illness under the umbrella of having a weak sense of identity.
When you have to trust: "Bro, believe me, I am a (x)," be it race, gender, whatever -- and then purport that such beliefs constitute real scientific study, then you're just plain wrong, lmao.
Hence my argument "Transracial is as real as Transgender." If you deny one, you're denying the other, Mr. Logik. For the record, I think you're right. There is no transracial, at least as something that isn't a subform of mental illness under the umbrella of having a weak sense of identity.
Science is just the study of the natural world
things like sociology are entirely unrelated to science
what carrot quotes as sociology is just his own poltitical takes on social issues
if cnn and the government agree then to carrot
that is a factual science based theory when in reality, it's just a bunch of biased democrats
