lets be real, hes leaving it ambiguous to please everyone
lolli-lovers get to live on thinking its a child
normal people hope it isnt
he is playing it safe and still servicing the japanese losers
There is absolutely nothing ambiguous outside of the precise age, unless you're really obssessed with wanting Bonney to be an actual child.
Kuma & Dragon are besties
They both have children in the Worst Gen
Kuma didn't have the hair loops when she was a kid
Kuma had the hair loops when he founded the RA
She hadn't met Kuma for ages hence she didn't know about what happened between him and VP...
Their Children would be roughly the same age for Oda, if not Bonney being older than Luffy.
She's already said: "When I was a kid... It was normal back then", despite having the ability to turn into a kid anytime she wants.
What exactly is he servicing???? Otama, young Robin, young Nami + sister, other girl in Wano, younger bonney we see with Kuma, young Reiju... he's drawn plenty of actual "little girls"... and none of them are sexualized.
People are trying to force their own fantasies of what is going upon another man, and that's just straight up weird. He even had to go out of his way to clarify that S-Snake stuff, due to how deranged the mindset of the fandom is that the 1st thing they jumped to was grown men being sexually attracted towards a child and legit believing that a renowned mangaka, Japan's #1 comic artist would draw pedophilia...