Controversial Which antagonist would yall say was in the right?
- Thread starter Yoho
- Start date
Sengoku has the supreme power to veto and order the end of the war. This does not remove the powers of a Admiral and other officers to give orders to foot soldiers. It was actually show that they were giving orders to continue the battle, even after the death of WB+Ace, not only Akainu.
Akainu was show trying to kill soldiers because they were deserters and it was in his right. Coby was a target because not only he stood in his way but also because of insubordination. Like he said the navy didn't need pussies that were in favor of criminals.
Coby wasn't punished because he was protected by Garp and I doubt Akainu even give a shit about him after the aftermath of the war (fight with Kuzan and recreating the Marines as a more effective force). Pure nepotism.
Akainu was show trying to kill soldiers because they were deserters and it was in his right. Coby was a target because not only he stood in his way but also because of insubordination. Like he said the navy didn't need pussies that were in favor of criminals.
Coby wasn't punished because he was protected by Garp and I doubt Akainu even give a shit about him after the aftermath of the war (fight with Kuzan and recreating the Marines as a more effective force). Pure nepotism.
The OG Higuma was just getting the world rid of filthy pirates.
Vivi and BW were killing Lavoon (an animal) to feed themselves, not evil.
Mr.3 was just killing pirates, good guy.
Wapol was just taking back his legitimatw throne, usurped by revos.
Crocodile was killing a celestial dragon to free Alabasta from the WG.
I can go on all day.
Vivi and BW were killing Lavoon (an animal) to feed themselves, not evil.
Mr.3 was just killing pirates, good guy.
Wapol was just taking back his legitimatw throne, usurped by revos.
Crocodile was killing a celestial dragon to free Alabasta from the WG.
I can go on all day.
Can y'all please stop with The Akainu is just doing his job narrative.
He believe in collective punishment, the idea of being blood related to criminal is worth execution, and doing cleansing of people without second thought due some of them being potentially criminals.
Honestly it's a such a red flag.
Probably one of first signs of genocidal tendencies I must say
He believe in collective punishment, the idea of being blood related to criminal is worth execution, and doing cleansing of people without second thought due some of them being potentially criminals.
Honestly it's a such a red flag.
Probably one of first signs of genocidal tendencies I must say
Preach my friend. Gaimonmind.
[automerge]1696796755[/automerge]
People who thinks that the judge can be also jury and exectutioner are either:
1. Children (age or mind or both)
2. Edgelord and mental children(see point 1)
3. Authoritarian believers that would be the first executed in a dictatorship being wasting their time here
4. Trolls
[automerge]1696796755[/automerge]
People who thinks that the judge can be also jury and exectutioner are either:
1. Children (age or mind or both)
2. Edgelord and mental children(see point 1)
3. Authoritarian believers that would be the first executed in a dictatorship being wasting their time here
4. Trolls
Blowing up Ohara civilians isn't wrong?
Killing Marines who were afraid of war isn't wrong?
Blaming children (they were pirates, yes) for the sins of their fathers isn't wrong? He only ever referred to Luffy as "Dragon's son" btw.
Trying to kill Koby isn't wrong?
He does whatever he deems is necessary as per "Thorough Justice".
Which Oda is again & again portraying as a wrong philosophy - in fact, he even said in an SBS that Kuzan once used to have "Burning Justice" as his Philosophy but after the Ohara Incident, he thought about it long & hard and then changed it to "Lazy Justice".
Killing Marines who were afraid of war isn't wrong?
Blaming children (they were pirates, yes) for the sins of their fathers isn't wrong? He only ever referred to Luffy as "Dragon's son" btw.
Trying to kill Koby isn't wrong?
He does whatever he deems is necessary as per "Thorough Justice".
Which Oda is again & again portraying as a wrong philosophy - in fact, he even said in an SBS that Kuzan once used to have "Burning Justice" as his Philosophy but after the Ohara Incident, he thought about it long & hard and then changed it to "Lazy Justice".