Krogo try to push a case against me two times in a row and two times with false arguments
I read your post.
And, there are issues.
1) you are assuming that tac is vig and shooted at you on two consecutive Nights
2) you are assuming that tac is stupid enough to fire as a vig on first two nights
3) you are assuming that tac is sussing you because his kills failed on you.
Your case is Based on assumptions. More so when kills getting failed on someone doesn't amount to that person being sus.
Now let me tell you Where problem lies and problem lies in your gameplay.
1) your reads - i went through your reads from day one. You haven't had any clear read on anyone. That's speak diplomatic stance. If it would have happened on one occasion then I could have understood it but it happened since day one.
2)on controversial one vs one such as sera vs me or cin vs final - on both occasions you didn't take any stance and were diplomatic. You had no concrete opinion on both occasions.
3)voting and building cases - you randomly voted tac when most were voting cin or final on day one.
No vote from you on day two. I have yet to see you actually pushing someone for a Lynch and its
What does it imply? You aren't decisive and bold and are being diplomatic.
Voting and building cases - you didn't build any case so far....
Infact, I noticed that you were defensive when someone sussed you.
Such gameplay is scum gameplay
And, there are issues.
1) you are assuming that tac is vig and shooted at you on two consecutive Nights
2) you are assuming that tac is stupid enough to fire as a vig on first two nights
3) you are assuming that tac is sussing you because his kills failed on you.
Your case is Based on assumptions. More so when kills getting failed on someone doesn't amount to that person being sus.
Now let me tell you Where problem lies and problem lies in your gameplay.
1) your reads - i went through your reads from day one. You haven't had any clear read on anyone. That's speak diplomatic stance. If it would have happened on one occasion then I could have understood it but it happened since day one.
2)on controversial one vs one such as sera vs me or cin vs final - on both occasions you didn't take any stance and were diplomatic. You had no concrete opinion on both occasions.
3)voting and building cases - you randomly voted tac when most were voting cin or final on day one.
No vote from you on day two. I have yet to see you actually pushing someone for a Lynch and its
What does it imply? You aren't decisive and bold and are being diplomatic.
Post automatically merged:
Voting and building cases - you didn't build any case so far....
Infact, I noticed that you were defensive when someone sussed you.
Such gameplay is scum gameplay