You claimed that your theory is right and that carrot has all pillars
Two things again:
1. This time this is not a theory, this is a prediction model. And don't have any conclusion here.
2. Carrot doesn't have all the Pillar. She gets them to an average of 72% just like Vivi (74%)
To get all the Pillar Carrot would need:
- To be rescued by Luffy
- To have a better character arc
- To have a desire
- To be recognized by Luffy
Since she didn’t join though that’s means that your theory is wrong.
No. The conclusion was that because Carrot was the closest to become a strawhat and was mainly constructed like a strawhat therefore Carrot will join after Wano. But this was proven wrong.
The model of prediction is still standing.
And that those pillars are either things that you saw because you wanted to see it or you have missed something else
Or, in the case that Oda changed his vision of Carrot last minute, I was right in my reasonning but wrong in my conclusion. This is not something that you can disprove.
Either way your theory is wrong, your logic is wrong, your reasoning is wrong. You don’t have evidence, you have subtext and things you claim to see. But nobody else can see.
Here, the only thing you are saying is "your conclusion was wrong therefore the evidences presented were unconclusive". In logic, it doesn't work like that. I could be wrong on my conclusion and still have presented conclusive proof of what I was saying in other words that Carrot was mainly constructed like a strawhat.
You therefore need to stop saying that my conclusion was wrong therefore my logic is wrong and start looking at my proof and evidences and debunk them one by one until there is none left and that you have debunked the entire prediction model.
Good luck.
So the FDA creates a bond between the protagonist and a potential SH, by creating a distraction many of Luffy's or other important events in OP were possible
Those two things are unrelated to each others. You are saying:
1. That your FDA is creating a bond between the characters
AND
2. That many event were possible because of this bond.
Point 2 is completely irrelevant when we are talking about characterization but, but we can look to point 1.
Problem: You don't explains how a distraction moment creates a bond between Luffy and the character. And don't explain why this distraction moment is a moment of characterization (and therefore of creation of character, something that all the pillars must be) You need to explain that.
"Here we see Ussop again using distractions to help the main protagonist against Luffy who was unable to deal with Perona on his own ( the cockroaches possibly foreshadowing the introduction of Caribou)"
This sentence doesn't mean much. What do you mean by "Usopp is creating a distraction to help the main protagonist against Luffy" Also, this is not how foreshadowing works (but that's a detail)
The dual type distraction,
Wait, what is this, a new pillar or a sub parameter in you FDA ?
The dual type distraction, One piece divides himself into two tones, whacky and goofy and serious and emotional, so the type of distractions bifurcates too, into goofy and silly distraction, e.g: Ussop introductory fight and serious and emotional or Yamato's fight against Kaido, a pivotal time wasting device for the protagonist to get back up.
Wait! You still haven't explain what do you mean by "distraction". I still don't know what plot point you are talking about here. If you want to explain that, you must do it at the beginning of your pillar.
For this post, I'll consider that you are saying that all the strawhats are ... "distracting the enemy" ? And that you are looking to this specific plot point ?
I still don't understand how a distraction is helping in the characterization of a character. Can you explain ?
We also see Vivi impartign this same type of distraction. In this case she imparts the extreme emotional type. Both distracting Crocodile once to help Luff while imprison and also by distracting the armies in Alabasta to allow the SH to deal with Croco-boy
You are losing me. I still don't know how a distraction relates to the characterization of a character.
We can also see that as a clear predictor of who is NOT going to become a SH, with the example of a negative FDA or anti-fda ( sometimes pronounced as anti-fa for covienience) , demonstrates who is NOT joining the crew like the example of Gernica, the CP-0 member who's antifa moment was to distract Luffy allowing Kaido to "kill" him, thus going agains the concept of FDA and rulling him out possible nakamas.
wut ?
who try to debunk my OBJECTIVELY CORRECT PILLAR.
We are not even there yet, I'm trying to understand your Pillar lol
But you are trying, which is something that I respect.
Best comment of today.