Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei must go gaolang > your fav is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
This article shows that the conclusion are biased. Plus their is a lot of assumption like the "turning gay" one which are completely baseless.
There is most likely no links between chemicals and human gender (same source, Swan).
https://www.axios.com/2023/07/05/pollution-vaccine-theory-trans-people-mainstream
This video is not just problematic on a scientific and social level, it create the assumption that transgender are created because of pollution.
There is most likely no links between chemicals and human gender (same source, Swan).
https://www.axios.com/2023/07/05/pollution-vaccine-theory-trans-people-mainstream
This video is not just problematic on a scientific and social level, it create the assumption that transgender are created because of pollution.
He backed down because he couldn't do it lol
He is same as any other politician, rich fucks that don't give a shit for poor people and will say any rhetoric for votes
What a load of bull lmao
Homosexuality and Trans existed in ancient times from North of Scandinavia to South of Sahara. Greece, Rome, Egypt and so were insanely gay and trans. What changed was introduction of Catholic church and Islam that squashed both with heavy prejudice. It is only in late 20th century we see rise of acceptance as it was during ancient times
Hell Alan Turning, guys responsible for ending WW2 quicker than would it be was chemically castrated because he was gay
He is same as any other politician, rich fucks that don't give a shit for poor people and will say any rhetoric for votes
Post automatically merged:
What a load of bull lmao
Homosexuality and Trans existed in ancient times from North of Scandinavia to South of Sahara. Greece, Rome, Egypt and so were insanely gay and trans. What changed was introduction of Catholic church and Islam that squashed both with heavy prejudice. It is only in late 20th century we see rise of acceptance as it was during ancient times
Hell Alan Turning, guys responsible for ending WW2 quicker than would it be was chemically castrated because he was gay
Rome was not "insanely gay", and it was a dishonour for a man to be "passive", which does not reslly sound like the inclusive paradise you describe.
Also, i don't think using as paragon of virtue civilizations based on the few using the many as slaves is the win you think it is.
In athens, only real athenians had rights, and that was like a 10% of the population.
And to talk about transexuality, search eliogabalus to see how feninization was percieved.
Stop learning history on tumblr.
Also, i don't think using as paragon of virtue civilizations based on the few using the many as slaves is the win you think it is.
In athens, only real athenians had rights, and that was like a 10% of the population.
And to talk about transexuality, search eliogabalus to see how feninization was percieved.
Stop learning history on tumblr.
Last edited:
This is the great scheme of the far right. To make the working classe think that they are fighting for them when they are in reality rooting for the upper classes. Donald dumb, Bolsonarrow and Marine la haine are great examples of that.
The reality is that the right and authoritarians have been ruling the world for decade with a few exceptions..
We are in dire need of left assistance
The reality is that the right and authoritarians have been ruling the world for decade with a few exceptions..
We are in dire need of left assistance
I learned history across 15 years of my education and Rome is one my favourite eras of history. Rome was heavy on gay stuff no matter if it was women women or man man action. Rome was insanely sexually free and open, on equal standing as today sexual stuff is.
But hey, let's see what an experts says
Stop the cap, Rome and Greece were gay as fuck
But hey, let's see what an experts says
Stop the cap, Rome and Greece were gay as fuck
Oh yeah, the experts.
An american assistant professor is the lead expert on rome.
Tell me, friend. Have you ever even translated a latin piece of writing in your 15 years of education?
Meanwhile, from the first 30 rows of wikipedia, where the overall consensus is expressed, we quote:
Roman men were free to enjoy sex with other males without a perceived loss of masculinity or social status, as long as they took the dominant or penetrative role. Acceptable male partners were slaves and former slaves, prostitutes, and entertainers, whose lifestyle placed them in the nebulous social realm of infamia, excluded from the normal protections accorded to a citizen even if they were technically free.
Literally what i wrote.
Maybe you should have spent better 15 years.
Because last time i recalled, being gay was not only being active in modern times.
And being passive in rome was akin to being a woman.
An american assistant professor is the lead expert on rome.
Tell me, friend. Have you ever even translated a latin piece of writing in your 15 years of education?
Meanwhile, from the first 30 rows of wikipedia, where the overall consensus is expressed, we quote:
Roman men were free to enjoy sex with other males without a perceived loss of masculinity or social status, as long as they took the dominant or penetrative role. Acceptable male partners were slaves and former slaves, prostitutes, and entertainers, whose lifestyle placed them in the nebulous social realm of infamia, excluded from the normal protections accorded to a citizen even if they were technically free.
Literally what i wrote.
Maybe you should have spent better 15 years.
Because last time i recalled, being gay was not only being active in modern times.
And being passive in rome was akin to being a woman.
You say this
but then you quote wikipedia
And it literally says they were free enjoy sex with other men, sometimes you take, sometimes you give, Rome was hedonistic society to the max, they preached of a lot of things yet would backstab their friends if it suited them
You are just pushing an agenda that suits you while hypocritically negating one source while praising other of same value that would suit you more.
And yes i have translated latin texts and i leaned latin in school and to this day i can converse in simple sentences
In short you are hypocritical and push agenda that suits you
but then you quote wikipedia
And it literally says they were free enjoy sex with other men, sometimes you take, sometimes you give, Rome was hedonistic society to the max, they preached of a lot of things yet would backstab their friends if it suited them
You are just pushing an agenda that suits you while hypocritically negating one source while praising other of same value that would suit you more.
And yes i have translated latin texts and i leaned latin in school and to this day i can converse in simple sentences
In short you are hypocritical and push agenda that suits you