Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei must go gaolang > your fav is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem loli real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Meet more women
Again it doesn’t even need to be anything sexual or romantic
The idea that women are parasites who just want providers is ridiculous
What about women who are lesbians? Or women who don’t want to marry? Or women who are highly successful and make more money than their husbands?
What about the countless healthy relationships where the woman views her partner as an equal?
Just because people in your family are shitty doesn’t mean you can project that onto the entire world.
Again it doesn’t even need to be anything sexual or romantic
Post automatically merged:
The idea that women are parasites who just want providers is ridiculous
What about women who are lesbians? Or women who don’t want to marry? Or women who are highly successful and make more money than their husbands?
What about the countless healthy relationships where the woman views her partner as an equal?
Just because people in your family are shitty doesn’t mean you can project that onto the entire world.
tell that to the girlfriends who nag at their boyfriends
or to the femminists bitching about how they hate men on twitter
at no point
did i say all women are parasites
there are women who are like sugar moma's and will take care of guys such things are just not the norm where the vice versa would be
technically have 1
it's just a waste of time tho, guy barely listens to me or what im saying
had another one before, same kinda thing
ofc i am
im talking of a large group of people
your talking about averages and the like when you speak at a group lv
it's like if you made the statement one piece is a shounen (boys manga)
does that no women on earth period like one piece no
but it does mean it's made for a male audience and is mainly enjoyed by males
same if you said barbie are dolls made for females, does that mean no man on earth ever liked barbie no
can keep going with examples but yea generalizations are done so we dont have to list exceptions everytime we make a statement on something
i actually pay rent
and ontop of it pay for my own food. that's more then alot of women can say they contribute
Speak to an actual women.
Really, go speak to a real woman.
Gadly, not everyone is like you, so don't worry, women will have plenty of good choice.
Simply because patriarchy impose this on them. That's not "a tradition"
I think you are not at your place for saying what women should or should not do dear sexist.
Those are exceptions.
That's not what objectification means.
1. All the claim here are wrong.
2. That's evopsy or evolutionnistic psychology (it consist in attributing societal behaviors and situations - most of the time situation that defavors women - on biology) and that's (90% of the time) a pseudoscience.
No, women are not wired biologically to seek physical and financiat security. That's a common sexist myth that a lot of evopsy defender have created.
Furthermore, not all "weak" (what does this means ????) and poor men are ending up alone. In fact a lot of poor men are married. And you are missing the sociological data behind it is that with less money comes less attractivity and that's not just for men. In fact women suffer the same fate. The reason is not biology, the reason is societal and linked to ours biases toward wealth.
Also wrong. And you are perpetuating a patriarcal myth that men are strong and can therefore fight for themself (you see @Bob74h , if you REALLY want to help men, its not the left or feminists you need to aim at, but sexist and patriarcal discourse like this one of the far right/Nameless, because its THEM who perpetuate those toxic myths about men)
In fact we are. Men are just raised not to be like women.
Evopsy again. That's completely wrong on a scientific basis.
Blame patriarchy for that. Don't blame feminists or their ally
The reason why there is very few women here is because this environment does everything to reject them, that's not because they are less social or they love less One Piece
The reason is education, not biology.
Feminist women have reasons to hate mate. When you will need to look over your shoulder 2 times per minute when you are walking up alone in the streets, you will have a say on this matter, but right now, its not the case.
Careful when you talk about science if you don't wanna be seen as ignorant on the subject.
Women DID hunt during "cavemen" days, so much that their body structure was completely different from the one you know today.
Yes, those societies were in a way, more equal toward women.
The reason why women are the way they are now is social. The development of sedenterity and agriculture (the birth of neolithic) created the premisses of our economy and the uneven development of ressources and laborforces. Where a unhappy woman could just walk away and survive or find another group during the mesolithic or other prehistoric periods before that, the development of material wealth and therefore the need to defends crops and lands masses destroyed that possibility, so women were forced into a passive position of mother under the influence of their partner.
This was the premisses of capitalism but also the birth of patriarchy as we know it.
Really, go speak to a real woman.
Gadly, not everyone is like you, so don't worry, women will have plenty of good choice.
Simply because patriarchy impose this on them. That's not "a tradition"
I think you are not at your place for saying what women should or should not do dear sexist.
Those are exceptions.
That's not what objectification means.
1. All the claim here are wrong.
2. That's evopsy or evolutionnistic psychology (it consist in attributing societal behaviors and situations - most of the time situation that defavors women - on biology) and that's (90% of the time) a pseudoscience.
No, women are not wired biologically to seek physical and financiat security. That's a common sexist myth that a lot of evopsy defender have created.
Furthermore, not all "weak" (what does this means ????) and poor men are ending up alone. In fact a lot of poor men are married. And you are missing the sociological data behind it is that with less money comes less attractivity and that's not just for men. In fact women suffer the same fate. The reason is not biology, the reason is societal and linked to ours biases toward wealth.
Also wrong. And you are perpetuating a patriarcal myth that men are strong and can therefore fight for themself (you see @Bob74h , if you REALLY want to help men, its not the left or feminists you need to aim at, but sexist and patriarcal discourse like this one of the far right/Nameless, because its THEM who perpetuate those toxic myths about men)
In fact we are. Men are just raised not to be like women.
Evopsy again. That's completely wrong on a scientific basis.
Blame patriarchy for that. Don't blame feminists or their ally
The reason why there is very few women here is because this environment does everything to reject them, that's not because they are less social or they love less One Piece
The reason is education, not biology.
Feminist women have reasons to hate mate. When you will need to look over your shoulder 2 times per minute when you are walking up alone in the streets, you will have a say on this matter, but right now, its not the case.
Careful when you talk about science if you don't wanna be seen as ignorant on the subject.
Women DID hunt during "cavemen" days, so much that their body structure was completely different from the one you know today.
Yes, those societies were in a way, more equal toward women.
The reason why women are the way they are now is social. The development of sedenterity and agriculture (the birth of neolithic) created the premisses of our economy and the uneven development of ressources and laborforces. Where a unhappy woman could just walk away and survive or find another group during the mesolithic or other prehistoric periods before that, the development of material wealth and therefore the need to defends crops and lands masses destroyed that possibility, so women were forced into a passive position of mother under the influence of their partner.
This was the premisses of capitalism but also the birth of patriarchy as we know it.
true but shouldt you want a system that better helps men as a whole instead of just going
yea screw my fellow men, they should stay poor and single
fuck em who cares about improving the quality of life for people
such a cruel way to view things how would you feel if you were born in poverty??
how am i a hypocrite??
guys get worried when walking on the streets too
like scared of getting jumped or robbed so literally no different to what your saying here
yea ex bf was mean to them so all men are bad
just bitter no different to what some men do
men didt make a movement out of crying over their exes tho so just far less petty
if that was true then men wouldt be homeless
wouldt be living with their parents more on average then before
wouldt be on welfare
the reality we exist in just cant be real if men provide for themselves without issue
you yourself even said poor and weak men struggle
https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/for...e-stupid-and-causing-issues-in-society.36213/
literally have a whole thread hating on the tradcon ideals and literally spent 50 minutes fighting with nameless over this subject
tradcons wanna impose harmful standards on men such as forbidding and shunning emotions but same is true for femminists
they wanna go after men if they sit with their legs open or explain things, called manspreading and mansplaining
both groups dont care about men as a whole despite being 50 percent of the popluation
Are you for real here, you are this much in denial of the reality of women sitaution? Did you ever speak with women about it ?
Its not just "tradcon".
It the discourse of patriarchy. You have pretty much the SAME discourse, just that instead of saying stuff against men, you are saying stuff against women.
You don't see the problem with those two behaviors ?
And you don't care about women despite being 50 percent of the population. You only care about the side you are on and the side the is oppressing the other.
Its not just "tradcon".
It the discourse of patriarchy. You have pretty much the SAME discourse, just that instead of saying stuff against men, you are saying stuff against women.
You don't see the problem with those two behaviors ?
And you don't care about women despite being 50 percent of the population. You only care about the side you are on and the side the is oppressing the other.