guys get worried when walking on the streets too
like scared of getting jumped or robbed so literally no different to what your saying here
yea ex bf was mean to them so all men are bad
just bitter no different to what some men do
men didt make a movement out of crying over their exes tho so just far less petty
like scared of getting jumped or robbed so literally no different to what your saying here
yea ex bf was mean to them so all men are bad
just bitter no different to what some men do
men didt make a movement out of crying over their exes tho so just far less petty
[automerge]1704278922[/automerge]
Speak to an actual women.
Really, go speak to a real woman.
Gadly, not everyone is like you, so don't worry, women will have plenty of good choice.
Simply because patriarchy impose this on them. That's not "a tradition"
I think you are not at your place for saying what women should or should not do dear sexist.
Those are exceptions.
That's not what objectification means.
1. All the claim here are wrong.
2. That's evopsy or evolutionnistic psychology (it consist in attributing societal behaviors and situations - most of the time situation that defavors women - on biology) and that's (90% of the time) a pseudoscience.
No, women are not wired biologically to seek physical and financiat security. That's a common sexist myth that a lot of evopsy defender have created.
Furthermore, not all "weak" (what does this means ????) and poor men are ending up alone. In fact a lot of poor men are married. And you are missing the sociological data behind it is that with less money comes less attractivity and that's not just for men. In fact women suffer the same fate. The reason is not biology, the reason is societal and linked to ours biases toward wealth.
Also wrong. And you are perpetuating a patriarcal myth that men are strong and can therefore fight for themself (you see @Bob74h , if you REALLY want to help men, its not the left or feminists you need to aim at, but sexist and patriarcal discourse like this one of the far right/Nameless, because its THEM who perpetuate those toxic myths about men)
In fact we are. Men are just raised not to be like women.
Evopsy again. That's completely wrong on a scientific basis.
Blame patriarchy for that. Don't blame feminists or their ally
The reason why there is very few women here is because this environment does everything to reject them, that's not because they are less social or they love less One Piece
The reason is education, not biology.
Feminist women have reasons to hate mate. When you will need to look over your shoulder 2 times per minute when you are walking up alone in the streets, you will have a say on this matter, but right now, its not the case.
Careful when you talk about science if you don't wanna be seen as ignorant on the subject.
Women DID hunt during "cavemen" days, so much that their body structure was completely different from the one you know today.
Yes, those societies were in a way, more equal toward women.
The reason why women are the way they are now is social. The development of sedenterity and agriculture (the birth of neolithic) created the premisses of our economy and the uneven development of ressources and laborforces. Where a unhappy woman could just walk away and survive or find another group during the mesolithic or other prehistoric periods before that, the development of material wealth and therefore the need to defends crops and lands masses destroyed that possibility, so women were forced into a passive position of mother under the influence of their partner.
This was the premisses of capitalism but also the birth of patriarchy as we know it.
Really, go speak to a real woman.
Gadly, not everyone is like you, so don't worry, women will have plenty of good choice.
Simply because patriarchy impose this on them. That's not "a tradition"
I think you are not at your place for saying what women should or should not do dear sexist.
Those are exceptions.
That's not what objectification means.
1. All the claim here are wrong.
2. That's evopsy or evolutionnistic psychology (it consist in attributing societal behaviors and situations - most of the time situation that defavors women - on biology) and that's (90% of the time) a pseudoscience.
No, women are not wired biologically to seek physical and financiat security. That's a common sexist myth that a lot of evopsy defender have created.
Furthermore, not all "weak" (what does this means ????) and poor men are ending up alone. In fact a lot of poor men are married. And you are missing the sociological data behind it is that with less money comes less attractivity and that's not just for men. In fact women suffer the same fate. The reason is not biology, the reason is societal and linked to ours biases toward wealth.
Also wrong. And you are perpetuating a patriarcal myth that men are strong and can therefore fight for themself (you see @Bob74h , if you REALLY want to help men, its not the left or feminists you need to aim at, but sexist and patriarcal discourse like this one of the far right/Nameless, because its THEM who perpetuate those toxic myths about men)
In fact we are. Men are just raised not to be like women.
Evopsy again. That's completely wrong on a scientific basis.
Blame patriarchy for that. Don't blame feminists or their ally
The reason why there is very few women here is because this environment does everything to reject them, that's not because they are less social or they love less One Piece
The reason is education, not biology.
Feminist women have reasons to hate mate. When you will need to look over your shoulder 2 times per minute when you are walking up alone in the streets, you will have a say on this matter, but right now, its not the case.
Careful when you talk about science if you don't wanna be seen as ignorant on the subject.
Women DID hunt during "cavemen" days, so much that their body structure was completely different from the one you know today.
Yes, those societies were in a way, more equal toward women.
The reason why women are the way they are now is social. The development of sedenterity and agriculture (the birth of neolithic) created the premisses of our economy and the uneven development of ressources and laborforces. Where a unhappy woman could just walk away and survive or find another group during the mesolithic or other prehistoric periods before that, the development of material wealth and therefore the need to defends crops and lands masses destroyed that possibility, so women were forced into a passive position of mother under the influence of their partner.
This was the premisses of capitalism but also the birth of patriarchy as we know it.
