Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
My... Gaad..
No way some dimwits here think there are only ONE kind of jews on the planet
Hence every hadith and islamic text is referring to all Jews no matter whether there are colonisers, oppressors, settlers and child rapists... Good, bad, worst involved.. Especially in the context of anti colonial charter
No way some dimwits here think there are only ONE kind of jews on the planet
Hence every hadith and islamic text is referring to all Jews no matter whether there are colonisers, oppressors, settlers and child rapists... Good, bad, worst involved.. Especially in the context of anti colonial charter
Read what I say for F sake...
Its not science who follow an ideology its an ideology that follows science.
same difference
wither you put the order in first and second
at the end of the day, your saying science is ultimately just idealogical no difference to a reglion
it was more of a hypotheical if you read
insofar as idealogy based science like gender studies yea im 100% anti science in regards to those things
if it's like biology im perfectly fine accepting such things
science only matters if it's true, if it's just parroting a idealogy then yea ig science is wrong
if christans got into science fields and took over to parrot their beliefs then yea would reject in such instances
so basically just modern women in the late 2000s
so no poor dudes,no 6 foot dudes,no dudes who dont make six figures,no dudes without a 6 pac
if anyone embodies selective breeding, it's those empowered femmist women
carrot likes
Post automatically merged:
Funny you say that about Christians when the first scientists were catholics priests
You need to research stuff before making a fool of yourself.
You need to research stuff before making a fool of yourself.
christans making science means all science entirely conforms to reglioius beliefs at least according to you???
does science proves the behemoth and leviathan are real mythlogical beasts???
There is SCIENCE and PSEUDOSCIENCE. Carrot propagades both pseudoscience and scientific fraud. Science can't deny or confirm any spiritual shit,because they have no tools for it. The Church has always being very pro-science.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_the_Catholic_Church
Scientific fields with important foundational contributions from Catholic scientists include: physics (Galileo) despite his trial and conviction in 1633 for publishing a treatise on his observation that the earth revolves around the sun, which banned his writings and made him spend the remainder of his life under house arrest, acoustics (Mersenne), mineralogy (Agricola), modern chemistry (Lavoisier), modern anatomy (Vesalius), stratigraphy (Steno), bacteriology (Kircher and Pasteur), genetics (Mendel), analytical geometry (Descartes), heliocentric cosmology (Copernicus), atomic theory (Boscovich), and the Big Bang Theory on the origins of the universe (Lemaître). Jesuits devised modern lunar nomenclature and stellar classification and some 35 craters of the moon are named after Jesuits, among whose great scientific polymaths were Francesco Grimaldi and Giambattista Riccioli. The Jesuits also introduced Western science to India and China and translated local texts to be sent to Europe for study. Missionaries contributed significantly to the fields of anthropology, zoology, and botany during Europe's Age of Discovery.[citation needed]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_the_Catholic_Church
Scientific fields with important foundational contributions from Catholic scientists include: physics (Galileo) despite his trial and conviction in 1633 for publishing a treatise on his observation that the earth revolves around the sun, which banned his writings and made him spend the remainder of his life under house arrest, acoustics (Mersenne), mineralogy (Agricola), modern chemistry (Lavoisier), modern anatomy (Vesalius), stratigraphy (Steno), bacteriology (Kircher and Pasteur), genetics (Mendel), analytical geometry (Descartes), heliocentric cosmology (Copernicus), atomic theory (Boscovich), and the Big Bang Theory on the origins of the universe (Lemaître). Jesuits devised modern lunar nomenclature and stellar classification and some 35 craters of the moon are named after Jesuits, among whose great scientific polymaths were Francesco Grimaldi and Giambattista Riccioli. The Jesuits also introduced Western science to India and China and translated local texts to be sent to Europe for study. Missionaries contributed significantly to the fields of anthropology, zoology, and botany during Europe's Age of Discovery.[citation needed]
the same source cites conflict between the chruch and science
not to say no christans ever contributed to the chruch.
but it's likely the same as any reglilion and science
https://blog.myparea.com/history-science-ancient-greece/
greeks have supported science too
https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/10/22/perception-of-conflict-between-science-and-religion/
some 59 percent of americans cite a conflict between the two
Look,i didn't say shit about Christians being the true religion just because xyz had scientifics achievements. Learn to read what i actually write and not what you imagine i think. My point was that being RELIGIOUS ( i didn't mention christian btw) doesn't equal to being unable to produce science. I know where you are coming from:"Religious people are superstitious,therefore can't think logically and be unbiased". Its an immature belief. Yes,religion has conflicted in the past with science,but still we had notorious scientific work done by religious people.
Last edited:
never said anyone christan cant support science
what you talking about??
most of the people fighting science are bible thumbing zealots who deny the big bang,evolution and round earth in favor of flat earth,creationism and god created universe
you only need to look at who's debating agasint evolution to tell which side is truly anti science
people who are basing their stances on belief, are always going to have positions which oppose facts
hardcore liberals/leftists like carrot are prime examples of that
men having an insane amount of privilge is just one of those idealogical takes, it's the reality that most of the homeless are male which cant be true if men hold all the power in the society
if im looking at reality with the viewpoint that x thing is true regardless of evidence then guess what im gonna ignore evidence cause that aint the framework used for the hypothical viewpoint propsed here
didt claim you did tho