Controversial General Political Discussion

[Herrera95]

Actually yes they did.
What they did is aknowledging the plausibility of an act of genocide.
They also warned Israel not to commit more harm on Palestinian civilians and asked for a report on this matter from Israel on this subject regarding their actions. If they don't comply, the actions of Israel will therefore be considerer Genocide. This was what we called "diplomacy".

If Israel continue, their gov will be considered guilty of crimes against humanity.

Negative.

They just said to Israel to make sure that they take actions for a genocide to not happen like allowing humanitary help to get inside Gaza like Israel is doing.

Nothing that the court said gives Israel a single drop of guilty therefore there is no asking for them to stop the attacks.

 

[BleakAsh]

My... Gaad..

No way some dimwits here think there are only ONE kind of jews on the planet
Hence every hadith and islamic text is referring to all Jews no matter whether there are colonisers, oppressors, settlers and child rapists... Good, bad, worst involved.. Especially in the context of anti colonial charter

 

[NAMELESS]

"Negative eugenism"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics

Section "Meaning and types", last pragraph, third sentence.

"Negative eugenics aimed to eliminate, through sterilization or segregation, those deemed physically, mentally, or morally "undesirable". This includes abortions, sterilization, and other methods of family planning."


Dawkins called "immoral" the act of carrying on the pregnancy of child with Down syndrom. This was therefore an eugenistic claim.



Actually yes they did.
What they did is aknowledging the plausibility of an act of genocide.
They also warned Israel not to commit more harm on Palestinian civilians and asked for a report on this matter from Israel on this subject regarding their actions. If they don't comply, the actions of Israel will therefore be considerer Genocide. This was what we called "diplomacy".

If Israel continue, their gov will be considered guilty of crimes against humanity.



Well, France is not really in control anymore. What is in control now are the Billionaires pomping up all the ressources of Africa. It's against them that native needs to rebel against.

The same billionaires that have the government and military by the balls. De Gaulle signed a unfair treaty with the Africans. You govermnet exploits 14 nations in Africa and they use that money to keep people like you comfortable.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

The same billionaires that have the government and military by the balls. De Gaulle signed a unfair treaty with the Africans. You govermnet exploits 14 nations in Africa and they use that money to keep people like you comfortable.

The intellectual dishonesty in this one is astounding. The government puts that extra money in their own pockets🤣🤣

 

[Bob74h]

Read what I say for F sake...

Its not science who follow an ideology its an ideology that follows science.

same difference


wither you put the order in first and second



at the end of the day, your saying science is ultimately just idealogical no difference to a reglion

No you are not. If you were you would accept all scientific disciplines and not just the one that suits your believes.

it was more of a hypotheical if you read



insofar as idealogy based science like gender studies yea im 100% anti science in regards to those things



if it's like biology im perfectly fine accepting such things



science only matters if it's true, if it's just parroting a idealogy then yea ig science is wrong



if christans got into science fields and took over to parrot their beliefs then yea would reject in such instances

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

same difference


wither you put the order in first and second



at the end of the day, your saying science is ultimately just idealogical no difference to a reglion







it was more of a hypotheical if you read



insofar as idealogy based science like gender studies yea im 100% anti science in regards to those things



if it's like biology im perfectly fine accepting such things



science only matters if it's true, if it's just parroting a idealogy then yea ig science is wrong



if christans got into science fields and took over to parrot their beliefs then yea would reject in such instances

Is there a particular reason why you use paragraphs in place of a period ?

 

[NAMELESS]

same difference


wither you put the order in first and second



at the end of the day, your saying science is ultimately just idealogical no difference to a reglion







it was more of a hypotheical if you read



insofar as idealogy based science like gender studies yea im 100% anti science in regards to those things



if it's like biology im perfectly fine accepting such things



science only matters if it's true, if it's just parroting a idealogy then yea ig science is wrong



if christans got into science fields and took over to parrot their beliefs then yea would reject in such instances

Funny you say that about Christians when the first scientists were catholics priests You need to research stuff before making a fool of yourself.

Post automatically merged: Jan 30, 2024

Is there a particular reason why you use paragraphs in place of a period ?

I suspect he doesn't know how to write.

 

[Bob74h]

No, eugenics is the act of selective breeding, i.e. only allowing people with favorable heritable traits to reproduce.

so basically just modern women in the late 2000s


so no poor dudes,no 6 foot dudes,no dudes who dont make six figures,no dudes without a 6 pac


if anyone embodies selective breeding, it's those empowered femmist women



carrot likes

Post automatically merged: Jan 30, 2024

Funny you say that about Christians when the first scientists were catholics priests You need to research stuff before making a fool of yourself.

christans making science means all science entirely conforms to reglioius beliefs at least according to you???



does science proves the behemoth and leviathan are real mythlogical beasts???

 

[NAMELESS]

so basically just modern women in the late 2000s


so no poor dudes,no 6 foot dudes,no dudes who dont make six figures,no dudes without a 6 pac


if anyone embodies selective breeding, it's those empowered femmist women



carrot likes

Post automatically merged: Jan 30, 2024

christans making science means all science entirely conforms to reglioius beliefs



science proves the behemoth and leviathan are real mythlogical beasts???

Science is unbiased,otherwise it isn't science,retard. Are you smoking crack? There are plenty of scientists that have done notorious work that had a religious background. You are ignorant.

 

[Bob74h]

Science is unbiased,otherwise it isn't science,retard. Are you smoking crack? There are plenty of scientists that have done notorious work that had a religious background. You are ignorant.

so in the case of gender studies those are unbiased to you???

 

[Gaimon The Pirate]

Science is unbiased,otherwise it isn't science,retard. Are you smoking crack? There are plenty of scientists that have done notorious work that had a religious background. You are ignorant.

There are plenty of examples of biased scientist manipulating experiments to obtain what they want.
Does this mean that gravity is false? No.
But there is gonna be plenty of scientist willing to bend reality.

 

[NAMELESS]

so in the case of gender studies those are unbiased to you???

What?Alright,i'm done with you,fucking clown.

Post automatically merged: Jan 30, 2024

There are plenty of examples of biased scientist manipulating experiments to obtain what they want.
Does this mean that gravity is false? No.
But there is gonna be plenty of scientist willing to bend reality.

Yes,of course.

 

[Bob74h]

What?Alright,i'm done with you,fucking clown.

carrot considers gender studies as valid science


so my point more was, what's considered science by some may just be biased idealogy and nothing more


nobody is saying, biology is false just shit like gender studies or liberal arts degrees

 

[NAMELESS]

Post automatically merged: Jan 30, 2024

carrot considers gender studies as valid science


so my point more was, what's considered science by some may just be biased idealogy and nothing more


nobody is saying, biology is false just shit like gender studies or liberal arts degrees

Post automatically merged: Jan 30, 2024

carrot considers gender studies as valid science


so my point more was, what's considered science by some may just be biased idealogy and nothing more


nobody is saying, biology is false just shit like gender studies or liberal arts degrees

There is SCIENCE and PSEUDOSCIENCE. Carrot propagades both pseudoscience and scientific fraud. Science can't deny or confirm any spiritual shit,because they have no tools for it. The Church has always being very pro-science.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_the_Catholic_Church

Scientific fields with important foundational contributions from Catholic scientists include: physics (Galileo) despite his trial and conviction in 1633 for publishing a treatise on his observation that the earth revolves around the sun, which banned his writings and made him spend the remainder of his life under house arrest, acoustics (Mersenne), mineralogy (Agricola), modern chemistry (Lavoisier), modern anatomy (Vesalius), stratigraphy (Steno), bacteriology (Kircher and Pasteur), genetics (Mendel), analytical geometry (Descartes), heliocentric cosmology (Copernicus), atomic theory (Boscovich), and the Big Bang Theory on the origins of the universe (Lemaître). Jesuits devised modern lunar nomenclature and stellar classification and some 35 craters of the moon are named after Jesuits, among whose great scientific polymaths were Francesco Grimaldi and Giambattista Riccioli. The Jesuits also introduced Western science to India and China and translated local texts to be sent to Europe for study. Missionaries contributed significantly to the fields of anthropology, zoology, and botany during Europe's Age of Discovery.[citation needed]

 

[BleakAsh]

christans making science means all science entirely conforms to reglioius beliefs at least according to you???



does science proves the behemoth and leviathan are real mythlogical beasts???

You are strawmanning his point.. He never said just coz there were Christian scientist so science conforms to everything in Christianity.

 

[NAMELESS]

You are strawmanning his point.. He never said just coz there were Christian scientist so science conforms to everything in Christianity.

He think religious people can't be scientists. Its a dumb,immature and ignorant belief.

 

[Bob74h]

There is SCIENCE and PSEUDOSCIENCE. Carrot propagades both pseudoscience and scientific fraud. Science can't deny or confirm any spiritual shit,because they have no tools for it. The Church has always being very pro-science.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_the_Catholic_Church

the same source cites conflict between the chruch and science



not to say no christans ever contributed to the chruch.


but it's likely the same as any reglilion and science
https://blog.myparea.com/history-science-ancient-greece/


greeks have supported science too



https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/10/22/perception-of-conflict-between-science-and-religion/


some 59 percent of americans cite a conflict between the two

 

[NAMELESS]

the same source cites conflict between the chruch and science



not to say no christans ever contributed to the chruch.


but it's likely the same as any reglilion and science
https://blog.myparea.com/history-science-ancient-greece/


greeks have supported science too



https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/10/22/perception-of-conflict-between-science-and-religion/


some 59 percent of americans cite a conflict between the two

Look,i didn't say shit about Christians being the true religion just because xyz had scientifics achievements. Learn to read what i actually write and not what you imagine i think. My point was that being RELIGIOUS ( i didn't mention christian btw) doesn't equal to being unable to produce science. I know where you are coming from:"Religious people are superstitious,therefore can't think logically and be unbiased". Its an immature belief. Yes,religion has conflicted in the past with science,but still we had notorious scientific work done by religious people.

 

[Bob74h]

He think religious people can't be scientists. Its a dumb,immature and ignorant belief.

never said anyone christan cant support science


what you talking about??


most of the people fighting science are bible thumbing zealots who deny the big bang,evolution and round earth in favor of flat earth,creationism and god created universe



you only need to look at who's debating agasint evolution to tell which side is truly anti science

Religious people are superstitious,therefore can't think logically and be unbiased". Its an immature belief. Yes,religion has conflicted in the past with science.

people who are basing their stances on belief, are always going to have positions which oppose facts


hardcore liberals/leftists like carrot are prime examples of that



men having an insane amount of privilge is just one of those idealogical takes, it's the reality that most of the homeless are male which cant be true if men hold all the power in the society


if im looking at reality with the viewpoint that x thing is true regardless of evidence then guess what im gonna ignore evidence cause that aint the framework used for the hypothical viewpoint propsed here

i didn't say shit about Christians being the true religion just because xyz had scientic achievements.

didt claim you did tho

 

[NAMELESS]

never said anyone christan cant support science


what you talking about??


most of the people fighting science are bible thumbing zealots who deny the big bang,evolution and round earth in favor of flat earth,creationism and god created universe



you only need to look at who's debating agasint evolution to tell which side is truly anti science







people who are basing their stances on belief, are always going to have positions which oppose facts


hardcore liberals/leftists like carrot are prime examples of that



men having an insane amount of privilge is just one of those idealogical takes, it's the reality that most of the homeless are male which cant be true if men hold all the power in the society


if im looking at reality with the viewpoint that x thing is true regardless of evidence then guess what im gonna ignore evidence cause that aint the framework used for the hypothical viewpoint propsed here







didt claim you did tho

You aren't much different than C4N. Don't bother quotting me anymore.