Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang>jurota i refuse to pay my taxes is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real men pay taxes say no to sleepy joe scratch that trump is cooked tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you
Yup. I believe Amihad are their names? They live just like that. Nope Amish. I checked. But not a single person. A group. Like a tiny society.
If you want to live on your own that would be like Robison Crusoe life style when he was in that island for 28 years.
Yeah no dude.
Humans regulate themselves just well. They don't need Estate. In fact Estate was what allowed slavery to happen in most part of our history. And using even using religion to justify. That human regulation you are calling here.
If you want to live on your own that would be like Robison Crusoe life style when he was in that island for 28 years.
Yeah no dude.
Humans regulate themselves just well. They don't need Estate. In fact Estate was what allowed slavery to happen in most part of our history. And using even using religion to justify. That human regulation you are calling here.
Fair pointas long as you are talking about sub leftist ideas. Leftist inside leftism can indeed be sometimes gatekeepers with others people.
Have you examples ? I've never heard about leftist going after freespeech.
Indeed, just like a lot of those country are currently supporting a genocide.. Sometimes countries make mistakes.
No, they call liberals the one in power. In reality, the left are called "woke" - Liberals =/= woke/leftist.
Sometimes uneducated people about politics will indeed call woke "liberals", but that's an error as leftism fight against liberalism.
Of course they do, simply because its concern the lives of actual people. Denying the existence and rights of actual people is not an opinion.
Not really, because in reality, what liberatarian are people who just consider that their liberty can override the liberty, rights and existence of others.
No mate. Most leftist are highly educated people since most of them follow sciences and researches. Lower class activist are people who know a LOT about society.
What you don't understand is that its the right and your side that is uneducated and ignorant about the world and reality. A simple example is this one: Rightist follow the concept of meritocracy without even understanding that this concept was documented as simply inefficient by social sciences.
And when leftist points that out, those people reject this knowledge by saying that social sciences are full of leftist bias. In short, they can't learn because they think the knowledge is against them.
Therefore, they stay ignorant about the reality world and human behaviors.
A simple leftist. Most probably a radical socialist. But I'm not a communist and I'll never be a liberal or pro capitalist.
Liberal are entry rightist, libertarian are a bit more rightist than that. Not really conservative but not liberal either. Believing in a system when you should have the liberty to do what you want is believing in a system where you freedom can override the ones and the rights of others. Its completely opposed to leftism but its the logical sequel of liberalism.
No. I just proved you that work hours where somewhat better in the past. In reality somethings were better in the past. For example, in hunter gatherer societies, there was probably no such thing as patriarchy and ressources where divided ethically and equally. There was also more liberty and less gender pressure on women as they were also hunter just like men.
This is just an example. Because we are in the future doesn't mean that we will essentially progress toward more progress.
For once you are right, I took very little care in checking the source and the informations provided in the article were biased and missleading. But what you don't understand is that those hours if - granted - missrepresented by the article were in fact a lot less invasive than what we have here. Because what you forget to add is all the hours of domestic chores that were added in that count but not added the the count of the average american working hours. In reality, we do a LOT more that just 42.3 hours workweek.
This doesn't really change my point and my previous one. Things were not worse in the past. We can still take lesson from the past (as long as we do a good job at it) and future is not necessaraly syonymous of progress.
No. Not only because of technology. Also because of a better system and a better redistribution of ressources.
AI are literally stealing people works right now. Sometimes even literally (for artists). So yes, we F*xking NEED to regulate AI and prohibit unethical usage. Not regulating AI is accepting unethical practices. The development of AI doesn't mean that we must let it lose without regulation Einstein.
Wrong. The best system will be based on solidarity. Simply because that what the human species is, a social specie. If you want freedom, go in a sahara oasis an try to create your own society there, but careful, you won't go far on your own.
Wrong. Its not about capitalist being hearthless or inhuman. Its about capitalist and liberal acting on their own interest. Billionnaire don't donate because they want to help people first. Billionnaire donate because its benefit them on taxes. If Billionnaire were really acting for others, they would donate and redistribute the quasi totality of their wealth.
A world where Billionaires and millionnaire exist while people can't eat or have a roof, is not a just, good or ethical world.
Bad example.. I always provide sources, most of the time scientific. They can be debatable, granted like that last one, but not providing evidences is not a trial you can put me into.
Have you examples ? I've never heard about leftist going after freespeech.
Indeed, just like a lot of those country are currently supporting a genocide.. Sometimes countries make mistakes.
No, they call liberals the one in power. In reality, the left are called "woke" - Liberals =/= woke/leftist.
Sometimes uneducated people about politics will indeed call woke "liberals", but that's an error as leftism fight against liberalism.
Of course they do, simply because its concern the lives of actual people. Denying the existence and rights of actual people is not an opinion.
Not really, because in reality, what liberatarian are people who just consider that their liberty can override the liberty, rights and existence of others.
No mate. Most leftist are highly educated people since most of them follow sciences and researches. Lower class activist are people who know a LOT about society.
What you don't understand is that its the right and your side that is uneducated and ignorant about the world and reality. A simple example is this one: Rightist follow the concept of meritocracy without even understanding that this concept was documented as simply inefficient by social sciences.
And when leftist points that out, those people reject this knowledge by saying that social sciences are full of leftist bias. In short, they can't learn because they think the knowledge is against them.
Therefore, they stay ignorant about the reality world and human behaviors.
A simple leftist. Most probably a radical socialist. But I'm not a communist and I'll never be a liberal or pro capitalist.
Liberal are entry rightist, libertarian are a bit more rightist than that. Not really conservative but not liberal either. Believing in a system when you should have the liberty to do what you want is believing in a system where you freedom can override the ones and the rights of others. Its completely opposed to leftism but its the logical sequel of liberalism.
No. I just proved you that work hours where somewhat better in the past. In reality somethings were better in the past. For example, in hunter gatherer societies, there was probably no such thing as patriarchy and ressources where divided ethically and equally. There was also more liberty and less gender pressure on women as they were also hunter just like men.
This is just an example. Because we are in the future doesn't mean that we will essentially progress toward more progress.
For once you are right, I took very little care in checking the source and the informations provided in the article were biased and missleading. But what you don't understand is that those hours if - granted - missrepresented by the article were in fact a lot less invasive than what we have here. Because what you forget to add is all the hours of domestic chores that were added in that count but not added the the count of the average american working hours. In reality, we do a LOT more that just 42.3 hours workweek.
This doesn't really change my point and my previous one. Things were not worse in the past. We can still take lesson from the past (as long as we do a good job at it) and future is not necessaraly syonymous of progress.
No. Not only because of technology. Also because of a better system and a better redistribution of ressources.
AI are literally stealing people works right now. Sometimes even literally (for artists). So yes, we F*xking NEED to regulate AI and prohibit unethical usage. Not regulating AI is accepting unethical practices. The development of AI doesn't mean that we must let it lose without regulation Einstein.
Wrong. The best system will be based on solidarity. Simply because that what the human species is, a social specie. If you want freedom, go in a sahara oasis an try to create your own society there, but careful, you won't go far on your own.
Wrong. Its not about capitalist being hearthless or inhuman. Its about capitalist and liberal acting on their own interest. Billionnaire don't donate because they want to help people first. Billionnaire donate because its benefit them on taxes. If Billionnaire were really acting for others, they would donate and redistribute the quasi totality of their wealth.
A world where Billionaires and millionnaire exist while people can't eat or have a roof, is not a just, good or ethical world.
Bad example.. I always provide sources, most of the time scientific. They can be debatable, granted like that last one, but not providing evidences is not a trial you can put me into.
All I'm saying is that is different from USA making an argument and Israel making and argument.
Countries are investigating the allegations. So far we only know of US officials taking a look without deeper investigation to confirm but saying it is highly credible. Soon we will have all evidences.
Yall love to choose the wrong side. Also all the international aid to people on Gaza is going to Hamas and not the people.
Countries are investigating the allegations. So far we only know of US officials taking a look without deeper investigation to confirm but saying it is highly credible. Soon we will have all evidences.
Yall love to choose the wrong side. Also all the international aid to people on Gaza is going to Hamas and not the people.
When a country's executive explains that it is normal and necessary to starve and prevent medical care to the population of another nation, then NO, the argument of said countries that the organization trying to feed and take care of the population is completely corrupted is NOT credible you genocide denier.
Yeah. And Mr Woke is the right one support terrorism.
Nope. It is common sense that they call woke or leftists as liberals in US. Everyone does that. No the uneducated that you call aka the ones who disagree with you.
No. I don't have to accept and call someone that born as a man as woman. He will never be a woman and should never be in the same sport as woman do. No one will die because of it. Even LGBT community is against it. Liberals like you are in a tiny bubble making noisy thinking you are the enlighten of the whole world and everyone should bow to your ideas.
There we go. Uneducated. There is no way someone's liberty to override another's. This is just illogical.
Nope. It is common sense that they call woke or leftists as liberals in US. Everyone does that. No the uneducated that you call aka the ones who disagree with you.
No. I don't have to accept and call someone that born as a man as woman. He will never be a woman and should never be in the same sport as woman do. No one will die because of it. Even LGBT community is against it. Liberals like you are in a tiny bubble making noisy thinking you are the enlighten of the whole world and everyone should bow to your ideas.
There we go. Uneducated. There is no way someone's liberty to override another's. This is just illogical.
No one is supporting terrorism beside terrorist and integrist mate. Relax and take a cookie.
And its a huge political error. An error that is helping the far right like yourself to deliver its narrative. In reality leftists are against liberalism. Anyone with a gram of political awareness understands that.
When someone refuses to check scientific researches. I consider them as ignorant people.
Then you are denying and promoting the denial of the existence of other people, which is not an opinion, but something that must be stopped. Sorry, but you will find us on your way mate.
Transwomen are women. Keep your transphobia for yourself.
Not a liberal, I'm against liberal. But you are definitely a far rightist and a genocide denyer. (and ignorant about the reality of the world, but that comes with the package)
When you are denying the identity of other, you are promoting an idea that is undangering the lives of other people, ergo, you are overrriding their rights, existence and liberty.
?
And its a huge political error. An error that is helping the far right like yourself to deliver its narrative. In reality leftists are against liberalism. Anyone with a gram of political awareness understands that.
When someone refuses to check scientific researches. I consider them as ignorant people.
Then you are denying and promoting the denial of the existence of other people, which is not an opinion, but something that must be stopped. Sorry, but you will find us on your way mate.
Transwomen are women. Keep your transphobia for yourself.
Not a liberal, I'm against liberal. But you are definitely a far rightist and a genocide denyer. (and ignorant about the reality of the world, but that comes with the package)
When you are denying the identity of other, you are promoting an idea that is undangering the lives of other people, ergo, you are overrriding their rights, existence and liberty.
?
What makes it so sad is that they hate the system but also play into the system's hands because they don't understand the system and everyone who tries to open their eyes is fake news to them. In all seriousness, folks like these guys tend to have great fighting spirit and could be useful at changing the system but their ignorance and narrow minded approach to literally everything in life not only renders them useless, it makes them their own worst enemy. They support policies that will harm them in the long run and then they complain why everything sucks and blame those whom they consider the enemy.
It's so tragic with these guys.
It's so tragic with these guys.
Maybe I wasn't precise enough, I wasn't talking about individuals living on deserted islands, I did mean societies. In a self sufficient society with relatively flat hierarchy there are no "jobs" in the modern sense
Ppl can't go take existing words and redefine them as they please. I get it you want to be independent and not have authorities dictate your life but you fell into a trap here. This hyper emotionalism is not going to help you in any way. You're always on edge.
Read my clarification :
Ppl can't go take existing words and redefine them as they please. I get it you want to be independent and not have authorities dictate your life but you fell into a trap here. This hyper emotionalism is not going to help you in any way. You're always on edge.
Post automatically merged:
Read my clarification :