[FNZ] Role Madness Round 11: Covid - 19
- Thread starter Reborn
- Start date
- Status
N
Rej and fallen situations are completely two different scenarios there is no ounce of similarity between them and you just wrote your second paragraph for nothing.
Do you really require Meta to always correct read someone? Hell, why even Meta matters? But for the argument sake we can also make argument that how can you tell it's fallen town play? You don't have his meta you know. So we go by the simple logic that his game play striked us either bad or good. There is no meta in that, you can't ignore or just let your doubt be eaten up because you have no meta on the player. You have to face that up... if you found someone bad you have to call them out... there is not one way to play as anti-town, there are lot of em.
And what will you do if you play with someone who have no meta at all?
To answer this, I think every voter on fallen prince was town because Finalbeta lynch was mislynch not scum lynch so there was no attempt to protect someone
Do you really require Meta to always correct read someone? Hell, why even Meta matters? But for the argument sake we can also make argument that how can you tell it's fallen town play? You don't have his meta you know. So we go by the simple logic that his game play striked us either bad or good. There is no meta in that, you can't ignore or just let your doubt be eaten up because you have no meta on the player. You have to face that up... if you found someone bad you have to call them out... there is not one way to play as anti-town, there are lot of em.
And what will you do if you play with someone who have no meta at all?
To answer this, I think every voter on fallen prince was town because Finalbeta lynch was mislynch not scum lynch so there was no attempt to protect someone
Post automatically merged:
W... who did it, where 
N
@Fallen Prince who do you sus now?
N
Didn’t know that wasn’t allowed, I just noticed he was posting elsewhere when we’d tagged him here so many times to no avail.
Ironically, I have to go offline for a while. Be back later for more “fun”
Post automatically merged:
Ironically, I have to go offline for a while. Be back later for more “fun”
You started your last post " you are online and actively commenting in Spoiler thread "...
I already explained that what player does outside this thread can't be used over here.
Don't use such langauge because that's borderline AS and create an impression (even if you don't intent to) that the said player has time to be online outside this thread but he is still not posting here which indirectly Imply he is deliberately avoiding this thread.
You want him to respond then quote/tag him but don't bring his outside activity here.
I already explained that what player does outside this thread can't be used over here.
Don't use such langauge because that's borderline AS and create an impression (even if you don't intent to) that the said player has time to be online outside this thread but he is still not posting here which indirectly Imply he is deliberately avoiding this thread.
You want him to respond then quote/tag him but don't bring his outside activity here.
Hello, i know few players here :waves:
I think is useless to say I read almost nothing, I read page 1 and i still am in catching up mode.
What made you post theory about how cult works?
Sounds like a derp clear attempt, of course the wincon changes, is logic.
Can you link me your thoughts/a case you made for them that makes you so sure about the lynch? Searching it would take too much time.
I have a problem for anyone who bad mouth a flipped villager. Now you make it with 2.
I hope you are an obvious villager if i go to read your Iso.
I hope you will go deeper in this analysis.
I think infecting is instead kill and for eg if here was one cult in day 1, now are 3 after 2 night with no kills imo.
Please someone who played more with this kind of setup tell me 8f i am wrong.
The second possibility is that here exists a doctor who is a mafia god and protected mafia kill 2 days in a row.
What means "us" Noctis?
hello! i have to read a lot.
Wait, you didn't vote for FB because he was scum for you?
waiiittt...
uh.. answer me pls!
I think is useless to say I read almost nothing, I read page 1 and i still am in catching up mode.
What made you post theory about how cult works?
The game is mafia, there has to be mafia. They had no money.
Or wait... What if your wincon changes when you're infected
Or wait... What if your wincon changes when you're infected
Can you link me your thoughts/a case you made for them that makes you so sure about the lynch? Searching it would take too much time.
I have a problem for anyone who bad mouth a flipped villager. Now you make it with 2.
I hope you are an obvious villager if i go to read your Iso.
I hope you will go deeper in this analysis.
I think infecting is instead kill and for eg if here was one cult in day 1, now are 3 after 2 night with no kills imo.
Please someone who played more with this kind of setup tell me 8f i am wrong.
The second possibility is that here exists a doctor who is a mafia god and protected mafia kill 2 days in a row.
What means "us" Noctis?
I estimate you just fine.
At this moment, no. But I am eager to hear him out, as well as our dear sub @Michelle
Yeah, I was thinking about that, we kinda forgot her yesterday.
At this moment, no. But I am eager to hear him out, as well as our dear sub @Michelle
Yeah, I was thinking about that, we kinda forgot her yesterday.
Wait, you didn't vote for FB because he was scum for you?
Post automatically merged:
waiiittt...
uh.. answer me pls!
I was pointing out the Noctis that can go to such limits to push a lynch and still have second thoughts before Lynch.
Nah, bt i am also not someone that lynch based on bare minimum info on a player, i vote when i am confident in my reads. Unless ofcrs i am lynching to get reactions, activity.
Maybe i find it more odd because there already are more scummy players in my eyes and that are active as well.
Plus we dont get much reads if all join bandwagon n vote a new player they gave no opinion on before. No way to differenciate one from other bt all voting in succession.
Anyway it's bad gameplay if townies don't push their own sus and just join bandwagon, they did the same with Beta and fallen later on. I have not more to say on this.
About last part, what if it was to town clear emself with the same reasoning as u did?
Nah, bt i am also not someone that lynch based on bare minimum info on a player, i vote when i am confident in my reads. Unless ofcrs i am lynching to get reactions, activity.
Maybe i find it more odd because there already are more scummy players in my eyes and that are active as well.
Plus we dont get much reads if all join bandwagon n vote a new player they gave no opinion on before. No way to differenciate one from other bt all voting in succession.
Anyway it's bad gameplay if townies don't push their own sus and just join bandwagon, they did the same with Beta and fallen later on. I have not more to say on this.
About last part, what if it was to town clear emself with the same reasoning as u did?
- Status