I support no terrorist. You can twist whatever I say how you want but you'll never change the meaning of it. Like 9/11 no matter how you look at it was an evil act because those people targeted did nothing. The Oklahoma bombing an evil act. The thing at the Grande concert an evil act. They all were done with the intention of hurting innocent people.
Post automatically merged:

Also before you say I have defended stuff the US has done. If you read what I said yesterday, I said our government likes to profit off of conflict. So, no I do not believe the US is a golden child.
I mean is "going after someone who attacked them on their land" not what these terrorists are doing after the US attacked their land?
Post automatically merged:

When you train your youth into thinking that military actions are the only way to stop wars, then its logical for the youth to join military.
I mean when the youth are brainwashed by their government as early as at elementary age what do we expect?
 

Zemmi

GodMommie
I see what you wrote but the thing is that it's normally the US that attacks others and then act surprised that they have so many enemies
Yeah but you are making it sound like I am saying things I never said. Yesterday I went on a little rant how many of our leaders profit off these conflicts here in the US and why no I do not believe Biden's handled it well for the overall view of the world. Not just him, the Bushes, Clinton, Obama & Biden, they're all on the same team in this they want conflict because that brings prosperity to them. So instead of being proactive about things, they let these things happen and promise a means of peace, with no intentions of actually handling it when there are ways to stop a conflict before it comes down to actual violence.
 
Yeah but you are making it sound like I am saying things I never said. Yesterday I went on a little rant how many of our leaders profit off these conflicts here in the US and why no I do not believe Biden's handled it well for the overall view of the world. Not just him, the Bushes, Clinton, Obama & Biden, they're all on the same team in this they want conflict because that brings prosperity to them. So instead of being proactive about things, they let these things happen and promise a means of peace, with no intentions of actually handling it when there are ways to stop a conflict before it comes down to actual violence.
I didn't see the post you made yesterday and I wasn't putting words in your mouth. It was YOU who said being in the airforce would've been cool because it's a comfy job
 

Zemmi

GodMommie
I didn't see the post you made yesterday and I wasn't putting words in your mouth. It was YOU who said being in the airforce would've been cool because it's a comfy job
And I stand by that. The Air Force is usually paid more and by comfy I mean they usually sit at a desk.

I'm not against the military and I'm not ashamed of that and I admire those who serve with good intentions of wanting to play a role in keeping their people safe. I don't hold anything against them for the choices the government makes for them. @AL sama might even say I'm a military fangirl :milaugh:Ok. he does say that.
Post automatically merged:

My comfy comment was more about the general memes about the Air Force.

It wouldn't let me add it as media, but memes like this.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ukg7UAazhYE?feature=share
 
Last edited:

AL sama

Red Haired
And I stand by that. The Air Force is usually paid more and by comfy I mean they usually sit at a desk.

I'm not against the military and I'm not ashamed of that and I admire those who serve with good intentions of wanting to play a role in keeping their people safe. I don't hold anything against them for the choices the government makes for them. @AL sama might even say I'm a military fangirl :milaugh:Ok. he does say that.
Post automatically merged: 25 minutes ago
you can't say I m wrong :suresure::suresure:

btw solis likes to twist anything and everything so don't bother
 
Criticize them. Explain why its easy, most of the time oppressive and not really qualitative to laugh at the expense of the oppressed and why laughing about people in power ia a much more couragous and tricky thing to do
Thats kinda ironic, as van brought up with the dwarf comedian, its usually not dwarfs getting offended over his jokes.

But sure, joking about people in power is coursgeous and tricky and commendable, dont disagree there.
Post automatically merged:

Choices of jokes talking ABOUT oppressed people are political not random jokes about random stuff, I didn't see only those kind of joke there. There could be multiple reason, here it could be to push the limit of what is acceptable for example.
They do alot of racist/sexist/whateverphobic jokes because they are funny and the point is to get their opponent to laugh.

Quick example: what do you call two transgender dwarfs having sex? Microtransaction.

Thats just a funny word play thats not at all intended to attack dwarfs or transgender individuals
 
its usually not dwarfs getting offended over his jokes.
Which is a testimony done on a few individual that doesn't really mean anything. Its like finding two or three trans saying that trans jokes are okay. You will always find people who are not oppressed by jokes. But when we look at the reality, those jokes have an impact and people who really are hurt by them don't speak to avoid being marginalized even more. In reality one strong person is not a reprensation of what people of said community really say.

One jokes doesn't hurt much.. 10 jokes is a little bit harder to tank and when thousand of people are doing the same then its problematic.

They do alot of racist/sexist/whateverphobic jokes because they are funny and the point is to get their opponent to laugh.
They are not laughing at the jokes, they are laughing at the person saying the jokes. In that case, its the gap between what a person think and what a person say that make people laugh.


Quick example: what do you call two transgender dwarfs having sex? Microtransaction.

Thats just a funny word play thats not at all intended to attack dwarfs or transgender individuals
Like I said, one joke is okay and fairly innoffensive.. Its when people make a living out of special kind of humor attacking special kind of people that its beginning to be problematic. One bad joke in between 100 good one is not problematic.
 
He's a little shit.
Post automatically merged:

Everybody has to stop feeling so offended for any little thing. It's why the world's going to shit. Not to mention the Woketards destroying shit as well.
Why do you feel offended by people feeling offended? Isn't this a testament to your mind being conquered and consumed by your emotions?
 
Everybody has to stop feeling so offended for any little thing. It's why the world's going to shit. Not to mention the Woketards destroying shit as well.
I think the world is going to shit because of capitalism, the far right, bigotry, inequalities, liberalism and patriarchy.. but yeah. sure.. if you feel ofended because people are offended... it must be a big problem.
 
Top