Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
H
Libertarian are not against the status co, they are aiming to increase the impact of the status co.
If you want to go against the status co, aim to fight capitalism not to increase its impact.
No lol. You want to to INCREASE THE IMPACT of everything. Capitalism and liberalism are already here, you simply want to increase their impact.
Then become anarchist not liberatarian you ignorant. Liberatarianism is literally a system that will prevent people to do what they want as it will increase the power of the rich and lessen the power of the poor.
Yes indeed, but for that you need to understand how society works and not expect that your freedom has 0 impact on the freedom of others.
You reallty have no idea just how worse the current situation can actually get. Once you create your liberatarian system and that everyone will be starving and angry and uneducated because you consider that science or education is not important, to who do you think people will turn to ?
Little help:
Your toxic ideology is a simple door toward fascism you piece of work.
Dude.. there is absolutely NOTHING communist about what the guy is saying. WTF are you talking about ?
At the worse, its close to anarchism, but even then the guy is completely obvious to a materialist vision of society and don't understand what is wrong with meritocracy or the notion of freedom without consequence.
Libertarians are not revolutionnist, they simply want to extend the impact and concept of capitalist that already exist.
That's something Herrera could actually become if he took the time to actually learn a bit about materialism, science or even social structures. He has a long way to go.
If you want to go against the status co, aim to fight capitalism not to increase its impact.
No lol. You want to to INCREASE THE IMPACT of everything. Capitalism and liberalism are already here, you simply want to increase their impact.
Then become anarchist not liberatarian you ignorant. Liberatarianism is literally a system that will prevent people to do what they want as it will increase the power of the rich and lessen the power of the poor.
Yes indeed, but for that you need to understand how society works and not expect that your freedom has 0 impact on the freedom of others.
You reallty have no idea just how worse the current situation can actually get. Once you create your liberatarian system and that everyone will be starving and angry and uneducated because you consider that science or education is not important, to who do you think people will turn to ?
Little help:
Your toxic ideology is a simple door toward fascism you piece of work.
Dude.. there is absolutely NOTHING communist about what the guy is saying. WTF are you talking about ?
At the worse, its close to anarchism, but even then the guy is completely obvious to a materialist vision of society and don't understand what is wrong with meritocracy or the notion of freedom without consequence.
Libertarians are not revolutionnist, they simply want to extend the impact and concept of capitalist that already exist.
That's something Herrera could actually become if he took the time to actually learn a bit about materialism, science or even social structures. He has a long way to go.
[automerge]1716762609[/automerge]
People and ideologies are much more alike than you may think. It is said that the extreme right and extreme left are much more close and have much more in common to each other than the center. There is Libertarians who comes by the right and others who comes by the left (see the famous politic spectrum of 4 squares). Libertarians are totally against governament/state that obligated you to do anything. Communists wants the working class to take control of it (which is illogical)
If you guys want to help Palestinians here is a sheet with all the verified Funds:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-DDMFyn-ttboPXrz1bB3MFk7BlzCwfugh4259Wh7U1s/htmlview
Communism is pro state not anti state (Edit, yes it can be). You are confusing that with anarchism. (which he is not close to)
Too bad for you, in this case, I know what I'm talking about and you don't. The day you will start to lecture me on materialism and the impact of is not happening soon mate.
This is completely wrong. Those are literal opposites.
Not really no and stop listening to bad diagrams
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-DDMFyn-ttboPXrz1bB3MFk7BlzCwfugh4259Wh7U1s/htmlview
Communism is pro state not anti state (Edit, yes it can be). You are confusing that with anarchism. (which he is not close to)
Too bad for you, in this case, I know what I'm talking about and you don't. The day you will start to lecture me on materialism and the impact of is not happening soon mate.
This is completely wrong. Those are literal opposites.
Not really no and stop listening to bad diagrams
Last edited:
My guy, at least have the guts to own up to what you’re trying to do, which is to steelman the “gay in Gaza” argument in order to justify genocide. Believe you me, if the shoe was on the other foot I’d be saying the same things, it’s called having deeply held principles regardless of external factors.
The original form of Communism that was pushed by Karl Marx, though incomplete, was one that was stateless, moneyless, and most importantly classless. Because dude died before his work was finished, others used variations of communism and Marxism. There's like 4 types if Marxism and 3 types of communism.
H
Go ahead, quote any of my posts in this thread. If you can find anything more that me calling someone "ignorant" (which is a observation btw, not an insult), you get a cookie.
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah.
- When you deny documented genocides and a documented history and reality, you are being ignorant.
- When you deny climate change despite the fact that there is a scientific consensus, you are being ignorant.
- When you deny the inexistence of meritocracy despite sociological researchs documenting it, you are being ignorant.
- When you defend capitalism and a system that is factually creating inequalities and multiple oppression while denying such oppressions, you are being ignorant.
- When you deny being far right despite the fact that you are sharing multiple ideas that are reactionnary and straight up crypto-fascist friendly, you are being ignorant.
In other words, in most subjects, you are ignorant. Its ok to be ignorant. The problem is that you are spreading toxic rethoric because of that.
And this is an objective observation.
- When you deny documented genocides and a documented history and reality, you are being ignorant.
- When you deny climate change despite the fact that there is a scientific consensus, you are being ignorant.
- When you deny the inexistence of meritocracy despite sociological researchs documenting it, you are being ignorant.
- When you defend capitalism and a system that is factually creating inequalities and multiple oppression while denying such oppressions, you are being ignorant.
- When you deny being far right despite the fact that you are sharing multiple ideas that are reactionnary and straight up crypto-fascist friendly, you are being ignorant.
In other words, in most subjects, you are ignorant. Its ok to be ignorant. The problem is that you are spreading toxic rethoric because of that.
And this is an objective observation.
Last edited:
And on top of being ignorant, you are a liar. Since I've actually never defended Hamas (especially after what they did). I'm defending resistance but not this group.
You, on the other hand, keep using the far right propaganda of Israel and you keep on denying the war crimes and crime against humanity of Netanyahou and his buddy.
So no.. I've never insulted you. I've only explained what you are or what you stand for. Objective observations.
You, on the other hand, keep using the far right propaganda of Israel and you keep on denying the war crimes and crime against humanity of Netanyahou and his buddy.
So no.. I've never insulted you. I've only explained what you are or what you stand for. Objective observations.