Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
I'm talking about moral realism that means ethical sentences like "kill is wrong" express propositions (this means that these sentences can be true or false) that refers in some level to objective features of the world
[automerge]1718835670[/automerge]
social pressure is still a kind of social interaction
[automerge]1718835670[/automerge]
Not a consequence of social interaction, a consequence of social pressure. The pressure to keep the species alive and well.
There is no such thing as "objective morality".
To us, morality is simply a social pressure and a result of our sociological context. Nothing more. Its not "objective", its in fact completely related to our experience.
Morality differ from one person to another.
For example, for me, you supporting far right bullsh*t is bad, its morally wrong. And yet, for you it's the right thing to do. Morality comes from the the world and our own experience. In that way, it can't be objective.
What is important in reality is not morality. What are important are the facts:
Is it morally bad to support far right ideas ? Depending on the person, not necessarily.
But
Are far right ideas bad for the wellbeing of humankind ? Objectively yes.
That's why I do not look at morality but I always look at the facts and their impact on society to tell you that you are bigoted.
There is no such thing as "objective morality".
To us, morality is simply a social pressure and a result of our sociological context. Nothing more. Its not "objective", its in fact completely related to our experience.
Morality differ from one person to another.
For example, for me, you supporting far right bullsh*t is bad, its morally wrong. And yet, for you it's the right thing to do. Morality comes from the the world and our own experience. In that way, it can't be objective.
What is important in reality is not morality. What are important are the facts:
Is it morally bad to support far right ideas ? Depending on the person, not necessarily.
But
Are far right ideas bad for the wellbeing of humankind ? Objectively yes.
That's why I do not look at morality but I always look at the facts and their impact on society to tell you that you are bigoted.
it doesn't matter if you believe god exist up in the sky
you can't see him, you can't touch him, you can't prove his existence
so therefore "his morality" is not objective in our world
it's actually funny you used a scientific definition for gravity to defend your religious "objective" morality, lmao
you can't see him, you can't touch him, you can't prove his existence
so therefore "his morality" is not objective in our world
it's actually funny you used a scientific definition for gravity to defend your religious "objective" morality, lmao
let's think about it, this is interesting
if he sees god, and i don't
which one defines reality and illusion?
considering the way humanity works, the majority or those in the side who have power will define reality
like Doflamingo put it, the winners decide history and reality in this case lmao
so it ends up not being objective, once again
if he sees god, and i don't
which one defines reality and illusion?
considering the way humanity works, the majority or those in the side who have power will define reality
like Doflamingo put it, the winners decide history and reality in this case lmao
so it ends up not being objective, once again
