Yes, however free will is necessary to choose to follow said conditions.
No free will = no ability to choose, meaning no accountability or obligation to do good
Technically yes. That's why - for the moment - we can't adapt our world to this knowledge. It must be done step by step.
And yes, one day in a far far FAR future. This will mean the ending of the notion of accountability that will be compensated by the appropriate system to coutner problematic behaviors.
Now, about the obligation to do good, it won't disappear as long as we leave together. Again, we are social animals and to be social, you need to behave socially. This means according to the implicite rules of the group.
Again, the absence of free will is not the absence of empathy or morality.
Yeah except it's wrong, humans do have free will 👍
Cute. but no.
Utter nonsense, and you cannot present any working definition of what morality is in the first place, just like you cannot define "understanding", or what a "thought" is.
You think everything is an illusion and as I said I cannot help mental illness
Again, I think you don't understand what materialism is.
Yes, reason-followers do tend to be idealistic
LMAO
No
There is a reason why the scientific method largely influence by materialism mate
What you think are "reason followers" are people who use only the part of science that suits their point of view.
Materialists embrasses ALL type of sciences.
Because men are generally not as weak as Logiko.