Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
He affirmed what I said earlier to, earlier I said the mind is an abstraction and he said that is technically true lol
He says he's playing with me but he is unconsciously agreeing lol
Whatever Top 10 Dumbest Takes exists for Logiko, let's add "truth isn't knowledge "humans have no free will", and "women are equally strong as men" to that list lolol
He says he's playing with me but he is unconsciously agreeing lol
Post automatically merged:
This isn’t even top 10 dumbest things you’ve said but its hella dumb
One thing is for sure, I’m betting on the average woman to beat your pencil neck bumass
One thing is for sure, I’m betting on the average woman to beat your pencil neck bumass
He affirmed what I said earlier to, earlier I said the mind is an abstraction and he said that is technically true lol
He says he's playing with me but he is unconsciously agreeing lol
Whatever Top 10 Dumbest Takes exists for Logiko, let's add "truth isn't knowledge "humans have no free will", and "women are equally strong as men" to that list lolol
He says he's playing with me but he is unconsciously agreeing lol
Post automatically merged:
Whatever Top 10 Dumbest Takes exists for Logiko, let's add "truth isn't knowledge "humans have no free will", and "women are equally strong as men" to that list lolol
He affirmed what I said earlier to, earlier I said the mind is an abstraction and he said that is technically true lol
He says he's playing with me but he is unconsciously agreeing lol
Whatever Top 10 Dumbest Takes exists for Logiko, let's add "truth isn't knowledge "humans have no free will", and "women are equally strong as men" to that list lolol
He says he's playing with me but he is unconsciously agreeing lol
Post automatically merged:
Whatever Top 10 Dumbest Takes exists for Logiko, let's add "truth isn't knowledge "humans have no free will", and "women are equally strong as men" to that list lolol
Again, you can know something without said thing being a truth.
Religion statements, for example, were considered common knowledge. Was it true ?
No. Because the state of knowledge is something in constant evolution. Its depends on the context of the creation.
You can wiggle ALL YOU WANT, you won't win this one.
I take that as a win
Again, no. A theory is a ensemble, its a complete model, its the ENSEMBLE that is either true or not.
Oh ? The come back of the reactionnaries and sexists ?
You guys want to have fun ? I'm getting bored right now.
Nop lol.
Close to the truth is not true. The truth is 1 or 0 its not "close to 1"
Lmao, you are new here, right ?
Ohhh !!? Interesting !
I sence a disturbance here:
- Either someone who doesn't know how to read and that would be too sad...
- Either someone that is used to deform all the point of views and arguments of its adversary...
Let me think.. if I'm correct and if I'm adding every information I gathered today...
Nooo... you are not a liberal, its too progressive you wouldn't have jumped on the "woman are weak" agenda so fast
BUT... you did talk about the "depravation" of society..
Hm....
Wait...
Did I just catched a new kind of dark type pokemon here ?
You want to play too AL ? Its been a while since our last dance..
Still nop, but I admire the resistance
Between "murder is not political violence" and "murder isn't violence" there is a gap mate .. come on.
I know you guys love to deform the arguments of your opposition because you are to lazy to understand them, but make an effort..
You are smarter than this :)
Said the guy who don't want to moderate transphobia
You are not ready. I told you, I'm only entertaining myself.
If I really wanted to debate with you, this would be a different kind of conversation
Religion statements, for example, were considered common knowledge. Was it true ?
No. Because the state of knowledge is something in constant evolution. Its depends on the context of the creation.
You can wiggle ALL YOU WANT, you won't win this one.
I take that as a win
Again, no. A theory is a ensemble, its a complete model, its the ENSEMBLE that is either true or not.
This isn’t even top 10 dumbest things you’ve said but its hella dumb
One thing is for sure, I’m betting on the average woman to beat your pencil neck bumass
One thing is for sure, I’m betting on the average woman to beat your pencil neck bumass
You guys want to have fun ? I'm getting bored right now.
Nop lol.
Close to the truth is not true. The truth is 1 or 0 its not "close to 1"
He affirmed what I said earlier to, earlier I said the mind is an abstraction and he said that is technically true lol
He says he's playing with me but he is unconsciously agreeing lol
He says he's playing with me but he is unconsciously agreeing lol
Ohhh !!? Interesting !
I sence a disturbance here:
- Either someone who doesn't know how to read and that would be too sad...
- Either someone that is used to deform all the point of views and arguments of its adversary...
Let me think.. if I'm correct and if I'm adding every information I gathered today...
Nooo... you are not a liberal, its too progressive you wouldn't have jumped on the "woman are weak" agenda so fast
BUT... you did talk about the "depravation" of society..
Hm....
Wait...
Did I just catched a new kind of dark type pokemon here ?
You want to play too AL ? Its been a while since our last dance..
Still nop, but I admire the resistance
Between "murder is not political violence" and "murder isn't violence" there is a gap mate .. come on.
I know you guys love to deform the arguments of your opposition because you are to lazy to understand them, but make an effort..
You are smarter than this :)
Said the guy who don't want to moderate transphobia
You are not ready. I told you, I'm only entertaining myself.
If I really wanted to debate with you, this would be a different kind of conversation
Last edited:
Again, you can know something without said thing being a truth.
Religion statements, for example, were considered common knowledge. Was it true ?
No. Because the state of knowledge is something in constant evolution. Its depends on the context of the creation.
You can wiggle ALL YOU WANT, you won't win this one.
I take that as a win
Again, no. A theory is a ensemble, its a complete model, its the ENSEMBLE that is either true or not.
Oh ? The come back of the reactionnaries and sexists ?
You guys want to have fun ? I'm getting bored right now.
Nop lol.
Close to the truth is not true. The truth is 1 or 0 its not "close to 1"
Lmao, you are new here, right ?
Ohhh !!? Interesting !
I sence a disturbance here:
- Either someone who doesn't know how to read and that would be too sad...
- Either someone that is used to deform all the point of views and arguments of its adversary...
Let me think.. if I'm correct and if I'm adding every information I gathered today...
Nooo... you are not a liberal, its too progressive you wouldn't have jumped on the "woman are weak" agenda so fast
BUT... you did talk about the "depravation" of society..
Hm....
Wait...
Did I just catched a new kind of dark type pokemon here ?
You want to play too AL ? Its been a while since our last dance..
Still nop, but I admire the resistance
Between "murder is not political violence" and "murder isn't violence" there is a gap mate .. come on.
I know you guys love to deform the arguments of your opposition because you are to lazy to understand them, but make an effort..
You are smarter than this :)
Said the guy who don't want to moderate transphobia
You are not ready. I told you, I'm only entertaining myself.
If I really wanted to debate you, this would be a different kind of conversation
Religion statements, for example, were considered common knowledge. Was it true ?
No. Because the state of knowledge is something in constant evolution. Its depends on the context of the creation.
You can wiggle ALL YOU WANT, you won't win this one.
I take that as a win
Again, no. A theory is a ensemble, its a complete model, its the ENSEMBLE that is either true or not.
Oh ? The come back of the reactionnaries and sexists ?
You guys want to have fun ? I'm getting bored right now.
Nop lol.
Close to the truth is not true. The truth is 1 or 0 its not "close to 1"
Lmao, you are new here, right ?
Ohhh !!? Interesting !
I sence a disturbance here:
- Either someone who doesn't know how to read and that would be too sad...
- Either someone that is used to deform all the point of views and arguments of its adversary...
Let me think.. if I'm correct and if I'm adding every information I gathered today...
Nooo... you are not a liberal, its too progressive you wouldn't have jumped on the "woman are weak" agenda so fast
BUT... you did talk about the "depravation" of society..
Hm....
Wait...
Did I just catched a new kind of dark type pokemon here ?
You want to play too AL ? Its been a while since our last dance..
Still nop, but I admire the resistance
Between "murder is not political violence" and "murder isn't violence" there is a gap mate .. come on.
I know you guys love to deform the arguments of your opposition because you are to lazy to understand them, but make an effort..
You are smarter than this :)
Said the guy who don't want to moderate transphobia
You are not ready. I told you, I'm only entertaining myself.
If I really wanted to debate you, this would be a different kind of conversation
Its beyond political violence. Its attempted murder. Plain and simple.
GRANTED, you could say that it is ALSO political violence, but its important to distinguish the two.
Why ? Because equating the two as political violence renders real political violence as illegitimate when they are, in reality, perfectly legitimate in particular contexts.
Its the same process as calling both "terrorist" a movement of resistance and a terrorist organization. Equating two form of violence as something horrible renders the action of resistance illegitimate.
It only allows authoritarian and fascists rethorics to grow and it render the possibility of opposition against those rethoric, inaccessible.
GRANTED, you could say that it is ALSO political violence, but its important to distinguish the two.
Why ? Because equating the two as political violence renders real political violence as illegitimate when they are, in reality, perfectly legitimate in particular contexts.
Its the same process as calling both "terrorist" a movement of resistance and a terrorist organization. Equating two form of violence as something horrible renders the action of resistance illegitimate.
It only allows authoritarian and fascists rethorics to grow and it render the possibility of opposition against those rethoric, inaccessible.
Muh fascism
If you think Trump is a fascist then every administration since the inception of the U.S. has been "fascist" given the Overton window.
Trump's positions more or less align with your average democrat 20 years ago. The average republican politician today would probably be called a socialist fruitcake by the average politician even 50 years ago.
So at what historical period do you consider the U.S., or most other democratic countries for that matter, not basically illegitimate? Because aside from some small blips in the political climate politically we're at the most progressive point in our history
Commies love throwing around the term "fascism" but they live in some alternative psuedo reality as if 99% of human history people haven't been vastly more reactionary than people are now
If you think Trump is a fascist then every administration since the inception of the U.S. has been "fascist" given the Overton window.
Trump's positions more or less align with your average democrat 20 years ago. The average republican politician today would probably be called a socialist fruitcake by the average politician even 50 years ago.
So at what historical period do you consider the U.S., or most other democratic countries for that matter, not basically illegitimate? Because aside from some small blips in the political climate politically we're at the most progressive point in our history
Commies love throwing around the term "fascism" but they live in some alternative psuedo reality as if 99% of human history people haven't been vastly more reactionary than people are now
