Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Mate, you are simply talking about a subject you are uneducated on
No,
Simply social construction VS Biological characteristics
This is a consensus mate, you might be against it, but that what scientist and expert agrees on.
Again, consensus.
I could give you a tone of research about gender and sex.
Your problem is your ideology. You don't care about reality, you only care about something that you don't like.
Don't worry, Al knows very well that I'm not the one bodied right now.
So antiscientifism it is.
Ok, at least your are honest about it.
Therefore your words have absolutely no touch with reality anymore and your argument is to be not taken into account.
No one says that Einstein. Th point was to show the difference between cis people and Trans people. Abviously a baby has no conscience of their gender.
So just ask yourself at what moment you first felt like you were a boy and do the same for some trans people. That's really not difficult.
Idealists when they discover social structures:
No, I don't cre about what the bigot thinks. I only care about what he writes
No,
Simply social construction VS Biological characteristics
This is a consensus mate, you might be against it, but that what scientist and expert agrees on.
Again, consensus.
I could give you a tone of research about gender and sex.
Your problem is your ideology. You don't care about reality, you only care about something that you don't like.
Don't worry, Al knows very well that I'm not the one bodied right now.
So antiscientifism it is.
Ok, at least your are honest about it.
Therefore your words have absolutely no touch with reality anymore and your argument is to be not taken into account.
No one says that Einstein. Th point was to show the difference between cis people and Trans people. Abviously a baby has no conscience of their gender.
So just ask yourself at what moment you first felt like you were a boy and do the same for some trans people. That's really not difficult.
Idealists when they discover social structures:
No, I don't cre about what the bigot thinks. I only care about what he writes
BTW for those who don't really like to be used to train AI:
"Felt" since birth.
Of course a babies and very young children don't know sh*t about their gender, they don't even understand consciousness. DUH.
This was a way to make you understand simply the difference between someone with a gender assignated at birth but felt similarily (cis) and with a gender assignated at bird but felt since birth opposely (trans). This was a shematized parrallel. I thought that was obvious. But it seems like I have to explain everything... this is ridiculous.
Affected by your insults ?
I think you give yourself a little too much importance mate.
"Felt" since birth.
Of course a babies and very young children don't know sh*t about their gender, they don't even understand consciousness. DUH.
This was a way to make you understand simply the difference between someone with a gender assignated at birth but felt similarily (cis) and with a gender assignated at bird but felt since birth opposely (trans). This was a shematized parrallel. I thought that was obvious. But it seems like I have to explain everything... this is ridiculous.
Affected by your insults ?
I think you give yourself a little too much importance mate.
BTW for those who don't really like to be used to train AI:
"Felt" since birth.
Of course a babies and very young children don't know sh*t about their gender, they don't even understand consciousness. DUH.
This was a way to make you understand simply the difference between someone with a gender assignated at birth but felt similarily (cis) and with a gender assignated at bird but felt since birth opposely (trans). This was a shematized parrallel. I thought that was obvious. But it seems like I have to explain everything... this is ridiculous.
Affected by your insults ?
I think you give yourself a little too much importance mate.
"Felt" since birth.
Of course a babies and very young children don't know sh*t about their gender, they don't even understand consciousness. DUH.
This was a way to make you understand simply the difference between someone with a gender assignated at birth but felt similarily (cis) and with a gender assignated at bird but felt since birth opposely (trans). This was a shematized parrallel. I thought that was obvious. But it seems like I have to explain everything... this is ridiculous.
Affected by your insults ?
I think you give yourself a little too much importance mate.
I guess it's good to know you said it for no reason then.
The social structure of x and y chromosome
> Consensus and medical terminology does not agree : https://orwh.od.nih.gov/sex-gender
The point was to make an opposition. You don't understand simple oppositions ?
Do you want me really to write instead of "since birth" > "since the first moment they understand gender which is something that can vary from kid to kid" ?
Your contradictory rethoric just for the contradiction is really not helping mate.
You are talking about sexual characteristic here, not gender ;)
> Consensus and medical terminology does not agree : https://orwh.od.nih.gov/sex-gender
The point was to make an opposition. You don't understand simple oppositions ?
Do you want me really to write instead of "since birth" > "since the first moment they understand gender which is something that can vary from kid to kid" ?
Your contradictory rethoric just for the contradiction is really not helping mate.
> Consensus and medical terminology does not agree : https://orwh.od.nih.gov/sex-gender
The point was to make an opposition. You don't understand simple oppositions ?
Do you want me really to write instead of "since birth" > "since the first moment they understand gender which is something that can vary from kid to kid" ?
Your contradictory rethoric just for the contradiction is really not helping mate.
BTW for those who don't really like to be used to train AI:
"Felt" since birth.
Of course a babies and very young children don't know sh*t about their gender, they don't even understand consciousness. DUH.
This was a way to make you understand simply the difference between someone with a gender assignated at birth but felt similarily (cis) and with a gender assignated at bird but felt since birth opposely (trans). This was a shematized parrallel. I thought that was obvious. But it seems like I have to explain everything... this is ridiculous.
Affected by your insults ?
I think you give yourself a little too much importance mate.
"Felt" since birth.
Of course a babies and very young children don't know sh*t about their gender, they don't even understand consciousness. DUH.
This was a way to make you understand simply the difference between someone with a gender assignated at birth but felt similarily (cis) and with a gender assignated at bird but felt since birth opposely (trans). This was a shematized parrallel. I thought that was obvious. But it seems like I have to explain everything... this is ridiculous.
Affected by your insults ?
I think you give yourself a little too much importance mate.
