Not on this scale, I'm sorry.
The Genocide of the Americas is - alone - more than 70 MILLIONS people.
Adding to that.. the colonization and the imperialization of entire part of the globe to Europe's profit. It's the COMPLETE appropriations of ressources the the displacement and enslavement of MILLIONS of people across the entire African continent. Without even taking into account the crusades and the different empires.
So no. It's not "similar everywhere". Europe literally killed the game in every point possible and completely transformed the world.
So much that some civilization (especially in Africa and South America can't get back up.. because of those actions and the CONTINUATION of Europe's and by extention the US's imperialism on their ressources and population.
So let's not create extra relativism and look at history how it really is. This is not about lynching Europe. I don't consider myself responsible for those atrocities, but we must understanding the past to understand the present and do better.
The death toll in the Americas was not wholly part of a genocidal project, but largely due to medical issues. But you already know and you choose to lie to keep your agenda.
Every war is made for profit, enslavement and appropriation are nothing new. The Europeans had a technological edge so they were able to conquer most of the world, but it's not like many of the subjected people were more peaceful. Plenty of them were probably even worse than the Europeans.
The only way Europe transformed the world is by means of technology, in this case (pertaining to war) transportation and weapons. Most of the other populaces didn't do it because they didn't want to, but because they couldn't. Even the crusades, which are something liberals always cry about, weren't really that big of a deal, especially if compared to the conquest done by Islam. They also ignore that Islam didn't always exist and these territories were taken by it from the Byzantines, and not in a peaceful way.
Some of the places you talk about also had populations that were always doing war, slavery or even cannibalism and human sacrifices, while some other places never even had these great civilizations you talk about. Perhaps the reason why they are not very advanced today is also at least partially why they weren't very advanced 500 years ago.