Controversial Is it bad to be a virgin into your late 20s?

kurwa

kurwa

‎
#125
#125
Literally nothing changes before and after sex for guys.
The only thing you are missing out is getting comfortable and transitioning to different positions instead of being stuck in just 2 like doggy and missionary.

Sex is pretty overrated.
Oral tho:kawak:
 
Mathias

Mathias

‎
#126
#126
K!NG HARA$H!MA said:
Nah, he used his ugliness as his advantage and statusmaxxed

That's a W
Click to expand...
Do you think I should inflict myself a cool looking scar on the face like the Germans in WW1 to look aristocratic ?


I think I'd instantly statusssmaxxxx and crown myself emperor :endthis:


I have made a "moodboard" for you Sir !









AL sama said:
its not a typo we call him harassment lol
Click to expand...
Ok lol, I was confused at first.

I'm being as much "serious" as the ALMIGHTY when he asked that old men to kill his son on that mountain and then said "NO bitch yo stupid or whut?"
 
Blax Blah

Blax Blah

‎
#127
#127
HeWhoHasNoEqual said:
If it hasn't happened for you by 21, then it's probably not for you, ever.


It seems to be a pretty real standard of judging whether or not someone is weird IRL.

You don't see many normal 30 year old virgins, frankly. We're all on this planet to poop out the next generation. If you don't do that (for whatever reason) you're a failure by nature's standards.
Click to expand...
I think it may not be good to call people failures for not wanting to do a thing that we with our current understanding of it think is intended by nature, especially as if that understanding changes a lot or completely in the future, that would just make it worse,

But you can choose what you want to do, personally I think that the purpose of life is to live, and I think that's true whether you look at religion, where God in major religions is a spirit of life or creates life just to have people exist and continue to live, or whether you look at people's current understanding of science, where, if it's true that your biological purpose is to have kids, that means not only is your body's biological purpose to live and to continue life, but also that, just as the next generation would be our bodies' biological goal, we were also at one point the goal of nature,

So the point of life is to live, not to have intercourse or to do something else,

And if I may include something specific to christianity, I think that the idea that the purpose of life is to worship God shows this too, why? Because in christianity God is called life, so if you worship God, you follow God, you follow life, you live, the point of life is to worship God, God is life, the point of life is to live,


John 14:6 - Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
 
Vekn

Vekn

‎
#134
#134
Monkey D Theories said:
Apparently the average person looses their virginity at a relatively young age.

I’m about 23, which is definitely on the older side.

I don’t think I would have an issue getting a girlfriend or having sex if I wanted to. A while back I downloaded Hinge just for fun and I was able to get a few matches within a day.

The thing is, I feel like there’s a very specific thing I want in life and I don’t want to derail my goals just for the sake of another person.

I’d like to get my masters degree
Work out and lose weight
Move somewhere up north, like New York City or Boston

Feel like only once I get what I want, will I be okay with settling down and getting married. Only then would it really make sense for me to start seriously dating people.

I feel like it’s so odd. Because if you ever go on subreddits like r/foreveralone or you listen to incels, they always talk about how miserable and humiliating it is to be a virgin in your 20s.

But idk it just seems silly. Most of my friends ended up losing their virginities in failed relationships. I just can’t see how that’s desirable.
Click to expand...
Monkey D Theories said:
Apparently the average person looses their virginity at a relatively young age.

I’m about 23, which is definitely on the older side.

I don’t think I would have an issue getting a girlfriend or having sex if I wanted to. A while back I downloaded Hinge just for fun and I was able to get a few matches within a day.

The thing is, I feel like there’s a very specific thing I want in life and I don’t want to derail my goals just for the sake of another person.

I’d like to get my masters degree
Work out and lose weight
Move somewhere up north, like New York City or Boston

Feel like only once I get what I want, will I be okay with settling down and getting married. Only then would it really make sense for me to start seriously dating people.

I feel like it’s so odd. Because if you ever go on subreddits like r/foreveralone or you listen to incels, they always talk about how miserable and humiliating it is to be a virgin in your 20s.

But idk it just seems silly. Most of my friends ended up losing their virginities in failed relationships. I just can’t see how that’s desirable.
Click to expand...
idk
 
BleakAsh

BleakAsh

‎
#136
#136
BleakAsh said:
Morals are ethics... Every society has em regardless of religion. Religions defines their own morals based on Scripture etc
They doesn't create the idea of morality .
So no, Morals aren't religion centric.. There is a concept of right and wrong in every society no matter how atheistic . Anything that is deemed right or is regraded wrong for whatever reason BECOMES A MORAL STANDARD. Idk bruh that's a very absurd and ignorant take.






Unless it is just limited to "you got a rod you better use it"
to premise it on "people around you hump around so you should to" doesn't make it valid (correct, right, obligatory ) that's subjective there is no objective reason why he should comply with modern promiscuous standards (i'd argue there is an objective reasons not to tho but that's a tangent)

Why are they valid? Do they have inherent good in them? An inherent benefit?

How can you deduce that its valid without a moral anchor?

I don't think this is proper reasoning, he could have just for pleasure and not thinking of benefit or loss, and he could not do that for the same reason there is no harm in it and it shouldn't dictate who he is on a social ladder. And for the society to dictate people who don't have sex with or without a reason to segregate them or to think ill of them.. Is what's OBJECTIVELY wrong with it if that's whats happening, it ironically for you is enforcing a moral standard that judges people based on their promiscuity.

I repeat there is no inherent harm in not having sex especially when the majority in the world would be reproducing, so it doesn't necessitate you to reproduce.. And opens you to more choices in life.
Click to expand...
Bars
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top