Due to a limit on resources
What limit of ressources ? Rich people own the ressources, if you don't have enough, take those from people who don't need them. It's very simple.
I think it is categorically unfair that ONE person would have to work for free effectively to provide for the basic needs of those who'd refuse to work.
Helping everyone doesn't mean that you will have to work for free, what is even this argument ?
Indeed, you make no sense.
You have too luxurious a way of viewing things.
No, simply human.
You on the other hand, refuses to take from thoses who have too much.
People do not deserve things simply because they are alive.
Yes they do, the basic need to survive. If you can't understand that, you are part of the problem.
Yeah, living is not meant to be hard. Stop wanking on the rethoric of Billionaires who are saying that so you justify their exploitation on yourself.
those who have genuine issues that prevent them fending for themselves.
Which is who I'm talking about genius.
I think were most opinions differ is what exactly "basic need" is.
Basic need to survive and live correctly. It's not hard to understand.
The latter is luxury and you should contribute to society in order to earn it.
Do kids contribute to society ? Are kids productive ?
?
more than half of the world is pro hamas right now
depending on where you live in this world it can be seen as a good or bad thing
Oh ? Based on what data ?
Not recognizing Hamas as a terrorist organization doesn't mean being pro-hamas.
I do not recognize the Hamas as a terrorist organization but a resistant one and yes I'm not pro Hamas and I denounce their war crimes
Dude, are you serious? Communism killed around 100 million people(high estimate). Multiple dictatorships and genocides. Communism is fucking brutal.
Do you want to know how many people died because of capitalism ?
