Oh..
Hm...
That's awkward...
I thought I was talking to TOBY this whole time.....
(Hence why I was so triggered.. I was a bit tired (still am (Sorry Toby)))
So...
Let me delete all of that and reply to you with this:
--------------
1 - I do understand the other side. Simply because
I COME from the other side.
2 - I'm acting a certain kind of way with certain kind of people. It's not a behavior things,
it's a political strategy
3 - I'm intolerant to hatred, intolerance and false informations. This is not me being an *ss,
it's me giving a sh*t
4 - Learn about the paradox of Tolerance.
I will be kind with you the day you stop spreading things that can hurt others.
Being peacefull means stop spreading things that are hurtfull. You are not peacefull, very few people are peacefull here.
You are alienating yourself. My reaction is a natural and normal one.
Nah, it's only the beginning
About the paradox of tolerance, I don't really have a specific response to it,
but I think that the argument about authority between marxists and anarchists may give an important perspective on it,
Marxists think that you must have a really strong state to opress the rich and act the interests of the poor, and that there is nothing more authoritarian than a revolution, because it is imposing the will of the people, and authority is the act of someone imposing their will on someone else,
Anarchists think that you must not use authority, but the opposite of it, and they say that a revolution is the opposite of authoritarianism, and that you must not use a state to get socialism, why
Because an example of authoritarianism is a slave owner enslaving people and beating their slaves, a husband abusing his wife, the slave owner imposes their will on the slaves, and the abusive husband imposes his will on the abused wife or children,
If the slaves overthrow the slave owner, do they impose their will on the slave owner, or do they just stop the act of the slave owner's will being imposed on them?
If the abused wife or children run away, do they impose their will, that of not being abused, on the abusive husband, or do they stop the act of his will, that of abusing them, being imposed on them?,
Anarchists say the slaves do not impose their will on the "owner" by overthrowing them, but that the slaves stop the act of someone's will being imposed on them,
If someone attacks someone else, and that person fights back, that person is not agressing the one who attacked them, they are defending themselves,
And when it comes to why you can't use authority to get socialism, it's because socialism is stateless so you can not get to an authority-less world by promoting the use of authority,